Search

Adam Karpinski wrote that the head of the Pentagon, whom he referred to as a Trump official, mocked the US allies in Afghanistan, and Radosław Sikorski quickly responded, advising him to direct those mockeries straight to the families of the fallen Polish soldiers. He also asked if there were any reactions from Nawrocki, Przydacz, and Bogucki. https://t.co/oqdJDasoVv #Polska #Afganistan #Trump (translated)

Waldemar criticized the statements about the constitutional crisis and the possibility of the state being taken over by Czarzasty. He argued that the constitution provides that in case the president is unable to act, his duties are performed by the Marshal of the Sejm, and reminded that Nawrocki had previously expressed a similar position. According to Waldemar, Berek and the others took an oath because the president refused, and the Venice Commission allowed for other solutions when the president blocks actions. The author pointed out that the opponents of this decision used offensive terms and referred to the "strength of the nation." Przydacz, as Waldemar reported, raised the alarm that the Constitutional Tribunal might soon declare Nawrocki unfit to perform his duties. Waldemar assessed that the critics reacted with panic because they were losing control over the Tribunal, which they had treated as their property for years. He added that it was not Czarzasty who abdicated or was lost, but his opponents who had weakened the Tribunal for years and were now screaming about succession and the use of force. He appealed for them to apply the constitution regardless of whether its provisions suited them. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)

Marta Lokje criticized the outrage after Przydacz referred to Tusk as "grandpa." She wrote that the offensive statements made by Lisa, Zembaczyński, and Kuźniar regarding the president did not bother Bułom and Stefaniak, in her opinion. She also accused them of failing to react to attacks on Nawrocki's daughter, while the term "grandpa" was supposed to deeply move them. #polityka #Tusk #media (translated)

Magda wrote that there was a division of duties at the Palace: Przydacz, who in her opinion did not stand out in appearance, insulted Tusk on X, while Bogucki said foolish things and recorded reels, making up for what he lacked in appearance. #polityka #media #informacje (translated)

The author wrote that Przydacz considered the introduction of police and military forces into the Constitutional Tribunal as a threat to Polish democracy. He commented on this ironically, calling him the first democrat of the Republic, and stated that the suppression of women's strikes, the use of Pegasus, and the destruction of judges constituted democracy in the version of PiS. #demokracja #Polska #PiS #PL (translated)

In Kyiv, I would also advocate for Brussels and Washington. But I would also advocate for Warsaw, because I have the impression that some politicians in Kyiv seem to think that Warsaw essentially, as young people would say, "by default" supports Kyiv. And of course in many aspects it does, but it never hurts to also advocate for those good relations. Marcin Przydacz pointed out that Kyiv is benefiting from U.S. intelligence information, which Europeans are currently unable to provide. #Ukraina #Polska #MarcinPrzydacz (translated)

Pan Diabeł Stockton wrote that Marcin Przydacz asked on RMF FM whether the president would have to swear in a Constitutional Tribunal judge selected by Donald Tusk if the candidate were a citizen of the Netherlands or Germany. Stockton described this statement as a message directed at recipients he described in an offensive manner and stated that a citizen of another country, meaning a person without Polish citizenship, cannot be a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal or any court in Poland. #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #DonaldTusk (translated)

In a morning conversation on RMF FM, Marcin Przydacz, head of the Office of International Policy, will discuss the situation surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal, the security of its judges, and the controversies related to the night prohibition law. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #konfliktpolityczny #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Marcin Matczak considered the president's attempt to control whether the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal elected by the Sejm met the requirements as usurpation. He argued that according to the principle of legality, the president would need a clear legal basis for such control, and — as he wrote — there was no such provision. Matczak criticized the hypothetical examples presented by Marcin Przydacz and Zbigniew Bogucki regarding the election of a horse, a monkey, or a person without Polish citizenship to the Tribunal. He described them as science fiction scenarios. He added that if the Sejm chose animals, it could invalidate their appointment with another resolution, just as — according to him — PiS did in 2015 to introduce substitutes into the Tribunal. He noted that in that case, people who had Polish citizenship were elected. In response to the arguments of Przydacz and Bogucki, Matczak presented his own ironic examples of possible presidential control: a test of knowledge about society and the Constitution, a physical fitness test, and a certificate from a parish priest about the candidate's impeccable character. He asked why the president should control one requirement and not the others. Matczak wrote that he considered the whole situation absurd. He assessed that caricatural legal arguments were being constructed so that the president — a potential defendant of the Tribunal — could decide who would judge him. He attributed such a position to Karol Nawrocki and his associates. #prawo #Polska #sędziowie (translated)

perhaps we have a situation that should be called a constitutional crisis, because it concerns a very important constitutional body. Secondly, I hope that the mere presence of the president in Poland will have a mitigating effect on those, I will say strongly, "legal bandits" - said Przydacz. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PolskaPolityka #KryzysKonstytucyjny (translated)

Marcin Przydacz informed that President Karol Nawrocki canceled his visit to Slovenia due to the escalation of the dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal and suggested that if necessary, the president would resort to the strength of the nation. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PolskaPolityka #KryzysKonstytucyjny (translated)

Monika_TeoriaZła assessed that canceling the visit to the international summit due to a local conflict was amateurish and harmed the image. She blamed Bogucki, Przydacz, Leśkiewicz, and Szefernakera for this decision. She accused their entourage of prioritizing party calculations over the national interest and the prestige of the office, and said that Nawrocki was pushed away from high diplomacy. She believed that these individuals should resign. #polityka #dyplomacja #wizerunek (translated)

Dorota Wysocka-Schnepf wrote that Magda Fitas had been working for years as a respected translator and had outstanding professional achievements. She also reminded that Marcin Przydacz's wife was employed at PZU during the rule of PiS, and her previous achievements in similar positions were, as she stated, unknown. #tłumaczenie #osiągnięcia #Polska (translated)

Jacek Fogiel criticized the way the President's Chancellery justified the lack of an oath from Maciej Berek as a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal. He wrote that a week earlier, Przydacz explained that Karol Nawrocki was not in the country because he was in the Philippines, and later Nawrocki himself pointed out that he was hosting the President of Montenegro at the Presidential Palace. Fogiel assessed that the reasons given changed, and the judge elected by the Sejm waited for weeks. He also accused the Palace of avoiding responsibility and wrote that according to assurances, the Tribunal was still supposed to operate with a composition formally chosen by PiS. #polityka #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #sędziowie (translated)