Search

B-ARMY360 asked Live Nation Brazil to clarify how decisions were made regarding the structure of the screens at the BTS shows in Brazil, what criteria were used, and why the changes observed during the Latin American leg of the tour had not been explained. The author stated that the company, responsible for organizing the events, should publicly address and respond to the fans' questions, who invested time, money, and expectations into the shows. They also requested that the audience sign and share a petition on the topic. https://t.co/sLgAcTN2if #Transparência #BTS #LiveNation (translated)

The Liberal Party stated that Flávio Bolsonaro had challenged a piece of information that he classified as false, saying that all labor rights would be guaranteed. The party also declared that the decision of Congress would be respected without question and that anyone claiming otherwise would be lying. Finally, it asked for votes for Flávio Bolsonaro on the 25th, using the number 22. #vote22 #flaviobolsonaro https://t.co/SordbSHrKX #Fakenews #DireitosTrabalhistas #Eleições2023 (translated)

Jones Manoel compared Flávio Bolsonaro's interview on Rede Globo to the presidential debate of 1989 between Fernando Collor and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, which, according to him, the network manipulated to favor Collor. Manoel stated that the interview was not a rigorous inquiry but a public relations effort for Bolsonaro, asserting that the candidate was able to lie and evade questions without being challenged. As an example, he cited Bolsonaro's statements about the 6x1 scale and about not cutting pensions, the BPC, the minimum wage, health, and education. Manoel claimed that the interview presented a candidate as a defender of workers who, according to him, supported measures against Pix, pensions, the BPC, the minimum wage, the SUS, and education. He also criticized the lack of questioning regarding the subordination to the United States and about proposals attributed to people close to Bolsonaro, such as ending Pix, handing over rare earths to the United States, and allowing the presence of American military personnel in Brazil. The author said that the owners of Rede Globo had lunch with Bolsonaro that morning and asserted that the interview had apparently been arranged. According to Manoel, the candidate appeared calm and would already know the questions. He accused the network of defending the interests of the elite and imperialism and supporting Bolsonaro, to whom he attributed the promise to end investigations into Banco Master and prevent punishments for what he called the greatest fraud in the history of Brazilian capitalism. #1989 #Mídia #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Otoni de Paula stated that, after years in which the Bolsonaro family was presented as opponents of the system, Flávio Bolsonaro's rapprochement with former opponents raised questions. He highlighted the lunch with Globo executives before the interview with Jornal Nacional, which occurred amid revelations involving Banco Master, and said that it was necessary to question the interests behind these rapprochements. #Política #Bolsonaro #Jornalismo (translated)

Julio Schneider stated that a report by Andreza Matais from Metrópoles reported that the lobbyist Roberta Luchsinger allegedly used a photo of Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, known as Lulinha, with President Lula, taken during an official trip to Europe in April 2023, to impress businessman Leo Slezynger from Unigel. According to Schneider, Luchsinger presented Lulinha as her partner and was hired to mediate Unigel's interests with Petrobras and BNDES. He added that, according to investigations by the Federal Police mentioned in the report, she received at least R$ 1.26 million between 2023 and 2024. Schneider also wrote that Unigel signed a contract with Petrobras in December 2023, which was later annulled after the TCU pointed out a high risk of loss. Messages released by the report suggested that Luchsinger requested permission to share the photo and suggested that Slezynger invite Lulinha to join the board of an investment fund. He said that the report raised questions about the use of familial relationships with the president to influence business with public companies and classified the case as a criminal organization. #Lula #Lulinha #Corrupção (translated)

The Football Planet reported, citing Gustavo Tutinha, that Vasco and the new investor Almirante should expand the dispute for the Maracanã. According to the publication, they would challenge the bidding and management of the Fla-Flu Consortium and seek to investigate possible irregularities and alleged breaches of the public notice, involving the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Attorney General's Office, and the Government. The publication added that the dispute could go beyond the match against Boca Juniors and reach the conditions of the concession. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha stated that Vasco and a new investor should expand the competition for Maracanã after the Deliberative Council approved Admiral's proposal. According to him, President Pedrinho had signaled this intention on the day of the approval. Tutinha said that questions about possible irregularities and alleged violations of the bidding document, as well as the involvement of the Public Ministry, the Attorney General's Office, and the State Government, had put the concession under greater scrutiny. He predicted that the bidding process, the obligations of the bidding document, and the decisions of the Fla-Flu Consortium would be closely monitored. The author attributed the change in scenario to the posture he characterized as arrogant from BAP and Frederico Nantes. He also stated that the competition for the use of the stadium could turn into a broader debate about the concession and management of Maracanã, which he described as a public asset, not property of the consortium. Tutinha said that the confrontation that began around a semifinal could be the start of a larger dispute. #Maracanã #Vasco #Licitação (translated)

The Pedrosa Channel reported that Luis Felipe Salomão, president of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), rejected the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. this Thursday (15) to suspend the decision that determined the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at the Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the channel, the court's order for the match to take place at the stadium remained valid. According to the published summary, Salomão considered that the managing company of the complex did not have standing to appeal through a request for suspension of security, an instrument that, according to him, was intended to protect collective interests. The minister assessed that the case involved private interests related to the exploitation of the Maracanã and that there was no demonstration of public interest that justified the measure. The channel reported that the manager claimed wear of the pitch, concentration of games within a short interval, and security risks due to the gathering of fans, as Flamengo and Botafogo would also be playing a basketball game at the Maracanãzinho. However, Salomão understood that no concrete evidence was presented of a serious threat to public order or safety. He also noted that the questioned decision already anticipated moving the basketball event to avoid overlapping audiences. According to the Pedrosa Channel, Salomão concluded that he did not consider the request as he understood it did not meet the requirements to be analyzed through this avenue. The minister added that any eventual questions regarding the actions of the judges should be presented through the appropriate appeals in the Court of Justice of Rio. The channel emphasized that the decision maintained the existing authorization but did not settle the dispute over the use of the stadium. #STJ #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

info aespa Brasil stated that SM Entertainment refused to enter "LEMONADE" in the Best Asian Pop Performance category at the Grammy Awards, despite projections from Billboard and Gold Derby pointing to aespa as a strong candidate for victory. The profile criticized the company's management of the group's international career, saying it squandered recognition opportunities and questioning its commitment to aespa's success. #aespa #GrammyAwards #SMEntertainment (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Institute of Cooperation, Human and Social Development (CODHES) presented, on Monday (12), a factual news item to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro, requesting urgent measures regarding the denial of use of the Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors. The match was scheduled for October 20, for the semifinals of the Copa Sudamericana. According to the publication, the document, signed by the president of the institute, José Roberto da Costa Junior, requested that the responsibilities of the presidents of Flamengo and Fluminense and the administrators of the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. be investigated. CODHES also requested clarifications regarding the powers of the concessionaire and about a possible influence of sports rivalry on the decision. The entity further requested that the Public Prosecutor's Office examine the situation of Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, who, according to journalistic information cited in the statement, was in the Netherlands when she suspended the authorization for the match. The request included clarifications about the trip, any functional suspension, and the exercise of the magistrate's duties during that period. The publication stated that the document mentioned more than 45,000 tickets sold and requested an assessment of possible losses for fans in terms of travel, accommodations, and transportation. The institute pointed out the possibility of compensation for material damages and potential collective moral damages, if the legal requirements were met, in addition to requesting measures to prevent clashes and risks related to the uncertainty of the stadium. According to Attention, Vasco fans!, CODHES also admitted the possibility of filing a collective lawsuit and resorting to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights if it identified violations attributable to the Brazilian state and if the legal requirements were fulfilled. #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco (translated)

Attention, fans of Vasco! It was reported that Vasco da Gama presented a 32-page manifestation to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro and asked the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto to reconsider the ruling that suspended the authorization to use Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20. According to the publication, the club pointed out the extension, by CONMEBOL, until October 13, at noon, of the deadline to confirm the stadium. It also questioned the writ of security from the conceding company Fla-Flu, invoked the priority of official football games provided for in the concession agreement, and cited assessments from the Military Police and statements from the Public Ministry regarding security and logistics. Vasco acknowledged that Estádio Nilton Santos could host the match but argued that this did not justify preventing the use of Maracanã. The publication added that the club requested the restoration of the decision by judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from October 9, which had authorized the game in Maracanã, and contested the adequacy of the writ of security from the conceding company. The request still depended on a new court decision, the profile reported. #Vasco #CopaSulAmericana #Maracanã (translated)

The BTS Project Brazil stated that leftist publications faced a possible wave of censorship on social media in recent weeks, especially on TikTok and also on X. According to the profile, videos with allegations and information of public interest received warnings for unverified content. The profile mentioned that some of the videos dealt with alleged crimes attributed to a presidential candidate and his supporters, as well as the fire at UFPE and behaviors it classified as violent by people linked to the right during peaceful protests organized by the left. It questioned why this type of content received warnings and encouraged followers to share, download, and repost the videos. The publication included the hashtags #FandomsNoMasp, #FandomsComLula, and #ArmysComLula. #FandomsNoMasp #FandomsComLula #ArmysComLula #Censura #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Democracia (translated)

KATSEYE BRASIL stated that federal deputy André Janones had created the WhatsApp channel Army of Lula, aimed at organizing and mobilizing on social media, and said that the space was being questioned. The publication also stated that its authors were at risk and that the fandoms would act using the hashtag #EXERCITODOLULACONTRACENSURA. #EXERCITODOLULACONTRACENSURA https://t.co/d3I7fs2iBg #ForaCensura #Mobilização #Fandoms (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, determined that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. should make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinals of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The decision was granted this Friday (9), after a request from Vasco against the concessionaire's refusal, which had alleged technical issues related to the maintenance and restoration of the field. According to the publication, the magistrate considered statements from the Military Police and the Public Ministry of Rio de Janeiro, which pointed out the stadium as a preferred alternative due to structural, logistical, and operational conditions, as well as issues of safety and urban mobility. He also mentioned previous disputes between the club and the concessionaire regarding the use of the stadium. The decision also determined that the Maracanã should be offered to Vasco under commercial and operational conditions equal to those practiced for Flamengo and Fluminense, respecting legal, technical, and safety requirements. The publication stated that compliance was urgent, as Vasco needed to inform CONMEBOL by October 10 which stadium would host the match, and that the concessionaire could still present its defense. #Maracanã #Vasco #SulAmericana (translated)

Palmeiras expressed indignation at the statement released by Flamengo on Friday (9) and asserted that the Rio club was resorting to old strategies to pressure the refereeing at a decisive moment in the season. They also attributed repeated unethical conduct to the current management of Flamengo. According to Palmeiras, by publicly criticizing referee Anderson Daronco for supposed errors at Vila Belmiro and mentioning that he would officiate the Derby on Sunday (11), Flamengo cast doubt on the CBF's appointments and embarrassed the professional. The club stated that Daronco should not be subjected to external pressures or carry the weight of a previous match into the classic. Palmeiras said that the CBF offered institutional forums to discuss refereeing decisions and conduct and defended that public statements should be made responsibly. The club also condemned announcements that, in its view, exceeded the limits of debate and called into question the credibility of the competitions. Suggested insinuations against referees, it added, did not help promote respect among the institutions and professionals in football. #Palmeiras #Futebol #Arbitragem (translated)

Rogério Marinho said he considered the meeting between Minister Alexandre de Moraes, the Director-General of the Federal Police, and the Director of Intelligence of the institution concerning, especially in light of questions about the preparation of reports without evidentiary value involving Minister André Mendonça. Marinho stated that at that moment, it was essential to ensure transparency, independence, and impartiality. He said that society had the right to know the purpose and context of the meeting and to demand guarantees against interference in the electoral process. He also stated that no authority or public body should be exempt from oversight, accountability, and public scrutiny. #Transparência #Justiça #DireitosCivis (translated)