Search

Paul Brandenburg accused Julian Reichelt and Dieter Stein of primarily wanting to belong and subordinate themselves. Many had repressed in recent years that, in his view, the two had never represented anything else journalistically. Out of a desire for media with high reach, mainstream appeal, and criticism of power, they had ignored the direction of Nius and Junge Freiheit and believed Reichelt’s alleged shift from supporter of “repopulation” and vaccination to opposition, wrote Brandenburg. Reichelt and Stein had made it easy for their audience to deceive themselves. The fact that they now openly acted as mouthpieces for the regime, Brandenburg explained, was because the regime was fighting for its survival. He wished that the regime and the journalists he disdained would soon perish. To those disappointed, Brandenburg advised being skeptical of an allegedly free and critical medium with sudden mass reach. According to his claim, opposition media on YouTube or other corporate platforms had not had any relevant reach over a longer period; he rhetorically asked why the platforms should allow that. #Medienkritik #Selbstbetrug #Opposition (translated)

The author wrote that Reichelt and Stein were apparently trying to set the same example with Alice Weidel that the left had previously set with Angela Merkel. Merkel was accused at that time of being lacking in empathy towards a young person. #Moral #Empathie #Politik #DE (translated)

The author wrote that Reichelt, together with his editor-in-chief and other associated actors, clearly declared support for Ukraine today. He categorized this as support for Merz's "question of fate," which, according to his account, should be inseparably linked with Ukraine. He then began to explain what had happened, but the contribution ended abruptly in the middle of a sentence. #Ukraine #Unterstützung #Politik #UA (translated)

The author portrayed Julian Reichelt as someone who publicly advocated for supporting Ukraine "to the last cartridge," and referred to Dieter Stein as his companion. He also accused Nius of adopting Merz and Springer's position on Ukraine and morally lecturing the AfD for it. #Ukraine #Politik #Medien #UA (translated)

The author criticized Julian Reichelt for complaining about an Antifa slogan in the "Bild" head office while referring to "eleven years after Refugees Welcome." In his opinion, Reichelt should have instead written "eleven years after ...," he explained. The sentence remained incomplete in the contribution. #JulianReichelt #Antifa #RefugeesWelcome #DE (translated)

Apollo News reported that ZDF initially invited Nius editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt as a guest for Florian Schroder's new late-night show and later uninvited him. It had previously become known that the format was explicitly supposed to criticize Greens and the Left as well. https://t.co/DhGM1L6NGU #ZDF #LateNightShow #Medien (translated)

The author wrote that he did not want to defend Reichelt, but he interpreted Stegner's reaction as an indication that Reichelt had caught the SPD off guard. According to his account, leading SPD members had used the whole day of mourning for Bas to exploit what he saw as false attacks on the Union. In this context, particularly left-wing party members had been vocal, whom he characterized with a derogatory term as pro-Russian. He accused Stegner of being the last person to lecture others about decency. #Politik #SPD #Anstand (translated)

The author wrote, referring to Julian Reichelt, that the result of the AfD in the election of the President of the State Parliament in Saxony-Anhalt indicates that at least four CDU representatives have openly deviated from the party line. At the same time, it suggests that Ulrich Siegmund has a majority for the office of Minister President. The author expressed enthusiasm about this. #AfD #Landtagswahl #Politik #DE (translated)

The author accused Julian Reichelt of inciting war fears himself. To justify this, he referred to statements that Reichelt had made the day before: Those who fear war must also fear Friedrich Merz. If Putin attacks NATO, one will have to pay for it under Merz’s leadership, Reichelt also wrote. #Krieg #Politik #NATO #DE #RU #NATO (translated)

The author accused Julian Reichelt of stirring up war fears himself. As evidence, he referred to statements that Reichelt had published the day before: Those who fear war must also fear Merz; if Putin were to attack NATO, one would have paid for it under Friedrich Merz's leadership. https://t.co/lwfU1SOR7h #Krieg #Politik #Angst #DE #RU (translated)

The author wrote that Reichelt's ten responses to Ronzheimer were not a rejection of aid to Ukraine or the course regarding Ukraine. Rather, according to the author, Reichelt made it clear that the war could not be won with this chancellor. #Ukraine #Reichelt #Krieg #DE #UA (translated)

Waldemar Hartmann announced that the next day he would be sitting with Alexander Kissler, Ralf Schuler, and Julian Reichelt on the "Sofa of the Majority" at NIUS LIVE. Since the three, to his knowledge, did not know how to play Schafkopf, a Bavarian card game, the round would instead discuss politics. Hartmann mentioned topics like Merz in Ukraine and the proceedings of the Day of German Unity in Bremen. To conclude, he wanted to present his "Goal of the Week." #Politik #Diskussion #SofaZeit (translated)

"Friedrich Merz no longer has a majority for his reform plans. His faction no longer wants to participate in what Lars Klingbeil holds in greedy and wasteful plans," says NIUS editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt this morning on NIUS Live. https://t.co/toDVNwAVbP #Politik #Reformen #Deutschland (translated)