Search

The Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland stated that the advisor to the President of the Republic of Poland, Szymon Stachowiak, while appearing in wPolsce.pl, claimed that the 8 billion PLN that the budget was supposed to lose due to presidential vetoes remained in the pockets of Polish citizens. https://t.co/RLODPVLqmb #Polska #Budżet #Obywatele (translated)

General Prof. Dr. Jamal Śmigowski wrote that the Sejm enacted internet censorship and a nighttime prohibition on that day. He appealed to Karol Nawrocki to veto these solutions, deeming the veto his duty. He added that the voters did not elect him to implement Tusk's authoritarian actions, and stated that otherwise, they would have chosen Rafał Trzaskowski as president. #Polska #cenzura #wolność (translated)

Political stalemate and excessive use of the presidential veto are identified as significant risks for the implementation of economic policies in Poland. Andrzej Domański pointed out in the Sejm the political risk associated with disputes between the government and the president. #budżet2027 #długpubliczny #finanse (translated)

Krzysztof Sałek from KO in Stalowa Wola wrote that events in the Polish internet and their effects in reality justified the urgent adoption of the bill vetoed by Karol Nawrocki. According to Sałek, the president justified the veto with freedom of speech. The politician encouraged the audience to assess what the bill was meant to prevent and stated that it was not the time for party vetoes. https://t.co/fBSUX3FYYU #wolnośćsłowa #polityka #ustawy (translated)

The author of the entry criticized Bogucki for calling Prime Minister Donald Tusk's walk near the Belvedere a grotesque "sidewalk and lawn" politics. He pointed out that Tusk was following his usual route between Parkowa and the Prime Minister's Office and recorded a several dozen-second material. The author accused Karol Nawrocki's entourage of inflaming the conflict with the government and then blaming the other side for it. He reminded that in his address, Nawrocki had opposed the ongoing political war and then called on the government to cease it. As examples of what he called a lack of "serious politics," he mentioned, among others, using nicotine bags during official events, weightlifting shows, historical statements, reactions to journalists, vetoes and conflicts with the government, as well as participation in boxing galas. He argued that criticizing the Prime Minister's walk while justifying similar actions of one's own camp meant applying double standards. #Polityka #Premier #Społeczeństwo (translated)

The author wrote that the European Commission presented proposals to lawmakers for preparing the Union to accept a larger number of member states. According to him, the package included five sets of actions, including limiting the right of veto, deeper gradual integration, and safeguards intended to "hit hard" at a group that was not specified in the visible fragment. #UniaEuropejska #integracja #polityka #EU #PL (translated)

The author opposed the acceleration of Ukraine's path to EU membership and the limitation of the veto right, attributing these proposals to the European Commission. He wrote that such a set of actions would strike at Poland's interests and pointed out that Ursula von der Leyen presented one of the proposals. https://t.co/eFpSDprzvW #Polska #Ukraina #UE #UA #PL (translated)

The author accused the senator of criticizing attempts to find a solution regarding the president's refusal to fulfill a statutory obligation, without addressing the obstruction itself. He wrote that the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are elected by the Sejm, and the president does not elect them, does not approve them, nor does he have a constitutional right of veto over this election. He allowed for a discussion on the legal basis for taking an oath in the Sejm, in the presence of the marshal, noting that it is about maintaining the dignity and public nature of the act when the president refuses to accept it. He considered the matter to be a serious legal issue and pointed out that it should also be asked on what basis the president could block a judge elected by the Sejm from assuming office. #prawo #Polska #demokracja (translated)

The European Commission proposes introducing special restrictions for Ukrainian agriculture as part of Ukraine's future membership in the EU, in order to protect European farmers, which raises mixed feelings in Poland due to the loss of veto power in some negotiating matters. #Ukraina #rolnictwo #UE (translated)

Jacek Fogiel commented on the information from the Republic that Americans are interested in changing the government in Poland. He suggested that this could explain Karol Nawrocki's talks with the White House and Vladimir Putin's planned participation in the G20 summit. In his post, he also mentioned vetoes, packages, horses, and Targowica. #Polska #G20 #Putin (translated)

The author of the entry accused Bogucki of manipulating the message about Nawrocki's decisions and questioned the claim that each of them stemmed solely from concern for Poles. He pointed out that political calculations, ideological disputes, and his own strategy could also stand behind the vetoes. He requested clarification on, among other things, the veto against the wind farm bill combined with solutions concerning energy prices, and then the presentation of his own project containing some of those solutions; the veto against the SAFE act regarding financing security and defense; and the referral of the act on extraordinary profits of fuel companies to the Constitutional Tribunal. He also asked about the vetoes against laws about the active farmer, the principles of practicing the profession by some doctors from outside the EU, the status of a close person, regulations of the cryptocurrency market — which were vetoed twice — and the amendment of the so-called Lex Kamilek. The author noted that Nawrocki had the right to use the veto power and conduct his own policy, although he still had fundamental doubts about the constitutional basis of his office's functioning. In his opinion, however, it was necessary to openly discuss the political, constitutional, economic, ideological, and strategic motives behind decisions, rather than presenting one's own actions as serving Poland, while portraying the government's actions as blackmail or a political game. He compared such a narrative to Trump's politics, where — as he wrote — one's own actions are presented as the state's interest, while opponents' actions are depicted as betrayal or blackmail. He added that Poland's system differed from the system of the United States and emphasized that he had provided just a few examples, without a detailed analysis of subsequent vetoes, laws, and statements. #Polska #polityka #demokracja (translated)

The author wrote that Moody's downgraded Poland's rating to A3, equating it with the ratings of Fitch and S&P. According to him, the agency pointed out the deficit and debt, as well as political barriers hindering their reduction. The author added that the draft budget for 2027 assumes 695 billion PLN in revenues and mentioned presidential vetoes regarding increases... #Polska #finanse #rating #PL (translated)

The author wrote that Moody's downgraded Poland's rating to A3, aligning it with the ratings of Fitch and S&P. According to him, the agency pointed out in its justification the deficit, debt, and political barriers hindering their reduction. The author added that the budget for 2027 assumes 695 billion zlotys in revenue and mentioned presidential vetoes regarding increases. #rating #Polska #budżet #PL (translated)

President Karol Nawrocki, despite earlier announcements about the possibility of a veto, signed the law on the extraordinary tax on fuel companies, which raised controversies and speculation about his motivations related to concerns over declining support among drivers and the ruling party. #KarolNawrocki #ustawalecznypaliw #polityka (translated)

Mrs. President wrote that the Republic and PiS have stopped defending the veto and started claiming that they were forced to sign it. She accused Szefernaker, Pobożemu, and Leśkiewicz of trying to present the failure in a better light. She pointed out Ziemkiewicz as the only one who openly admitted that this time Tusk outplayed the president, while the others were attributed with declaring victory despite the failure. #KoniecRumakowania #Polityka #Wybory #Tusk (translated)

Pablo claimed that the person vetoing the laws mistakenly believed that by doing so they were hitting the government. He wrote that support for the Civic Coalition was growing with each veto, and Donald Tusk was the only person capable of stopping it from destroying Poland. He added that these actions were hitting families. https://t.co/waMSavSLoC #Polska #DonaldTusk #KoalicjaObywatelska (translated)