Search

"However, the decision is pleasantly surprising. I have the impression that for the first time, the president has risen above the fight over whose is on top with his signature. Unfortunately, the message itself was used for political battle," stated journalist Paweł Pawłowski from WP. (translated)

The decision by @NawrockiKn to sign the law allowing for the acquisition of funds to lower fuel prices may turn out to be much more costly for the president than it seems today. No, not even the best-directed speech creation will change that. I don't know who and how strongly pressed. (translated)

The president @NawrockiKn signed the law concerning excess profits of fuel companies and ended the process of putting Poles in the role of political hostages! The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices! Listen to an important message from the President of the Republic of Poland. Every decision (translated)

President Nawrocki signed a bill regarding the excess profits of fuel corporations and ended the process of placing Poles in the role of political hostages! The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices! Listen to an important message from the President of Poland. Every decision of the President is summarized by the sentence: "First of all Poland, first of all Poles." The President does not look at legal tricks and political calculations, but at the effects that a given solution brings to Poles. (translated)

✅ OFFICIAL: FC Barcelona responds to the statement from Real Madrid. UEFA has not initiated any new disciplinary proceedings against FC Barcelona. The proceedings began in 2023 with the appointment of two investigators, who have since taken actions they deemed necessary. The club has always complied with all their requests. These proceedings have not been resumed because they were never closed. UEFA's statement confirms the receipt of documentation sent by Real Madrid and its assessment by investigators as part of the ongoing investigation. The statement explicitly refers twice to the ongoing investigation and review. Therefore, it does not announce the initiation, resumption, or reactivation of any case, nor does it contain any statements regarding the substance or value of the submitted documentation. It is up to the investigators to decide what actions they consider appropriate in relation to this documentation. To date, they have not approached FC Barcelona with any new requests nor have they relayed Real Madrid's complaint to the Club. If they do, the Club will respond accordingly, as it has done so far. According to the applicable regulations, this act is subject to the resolution of the criminal proceedings ongoing in Spain and will remain there. Since the beginning of the investigation, FC Barcelona has been obtaining UEFA licenses without objection and has participated in UEFA competitions. [@FCBarcelona] (translated)

The difference in VAR decisions in favor of and against since the introduction of this system in La Liga (season 18/19) for the three main title contenders. ▪️Atlético Madrid: +8 (66 in favor and 58 against). ▪️FC Barcelona: +9 (59 in favor and 50 against). ▪️Real Madrid: -40 (50 in favor and 90 against). (translated)

A fatal idea was to even get involved in the KPO - the decision of Mr. Morawiecki and of course also Mr. Kaczyński. The program is ENTIRELY funded by a loan, and the annex to the KPO is full of scandalous conditions and milestones agreed upon in mysterious circumstances, which continue to have repercussions to this day. For example, hastily made general plans that unexpectedly deprive hundreds of thousands of people of the possibility to build on their own land, that's the KPO. A disastrous PIP reform - KPO. Clean transport zones - KPO. And one could go on like this. Let us not forget that all of this is the doing of PiS and Mr. @MorawieckiM. (translated)

WHEN TO STEAL, THEN MILLIONS. WHEN TO MOVE, THEN POLISH LAW. WHEN TO COMBINE, THEN IRON LETTER. Romanowski received an iron letter despite the prosecutor's objection. The decision is not final. You, ordinary Pole, be late with a fine, tax, or installment. The state will find you without any problem. Paragraph, interest, bailiff, no philosophy. But when it comes to a politician, big money, immunities, and expensive law firms, suddenly the law becomes as flexible as an old pair of underpants. Romanowski is not convicted in this case, and the court has to decide about guilt. But looking at this circus, it's hard not to ask, does the same law apply to him and an ordinary Pole? Well, fucking no. And just completely on the sidelines, what the hell do we need all this alphabet of services, agencies, commands, and international cooperation for, when a person subject to the European Arrest Warrant can sit abroad for months, and the Polish state can't bring him before a Polish court? And it will turn out that he will run in the elections, enter the Sejm, and we will start another season titled: "AND YOU CAN DO NOTHING TO US." Because in Poland, the little one has a paragraph. And the politician has an interpretation, lawyers, time, and if necessary, even an iron letter. (translated)

Judge Mielcarek previously shared the post by Lawyers for Poland, in which the actions of the prosecutor's office against Romanowski were called a disgraceful action and a farce, and the actions of the police were compared to a totalitarian state. The judge, who publicly shared such unambiguously engaged content regarding Romanowski, should have recused himself from his case. He did not do that. Today he decided to issue Romanowski an iron letter despite the prosecutor's objection. The decision is not final. It speaks for itself. (translated)

Sir Ciecióra, The President did not veto either the EU SAFE instrument or the EU Council's decision to provide financing to Poland, so please do not manipulate. He vetoed the Polish act on the Financial Instrument for Increasing Security SAFE – that is, the act that creates a national mechanism for managing these funds at BGK and the rules for their use, control, and audit. This is really not the same as your: "Tusk bypassed the veto and took out a loan" 🤷‍♂️ If you want to raise a constitutional or financial allegation, you should first precisely clarify which act was vetoed and what legal consequences this veto caused. And to do that, you first need to read the law that the President actually vetoed with understanding and check what mechanisms it introduced. Only then can one build a political narrative on it. And now the second part of your entry. You are comparing two completely different legal procedures and from this difference, you are making hypocrisy; I am shocked by your logic in this regard. SAFE is a EU law instrument. Financial assistance for Poland was made available by a decision of the EU Council based on the SAFE regulation, and the financing conditions are then specified in a loan agreement with the Commission. On the other hand, lowering Polish taxes requires a change in Polish law. And the law – according to the Constitution – after being passed by parliament goes to the President 🤷‍♂️ It is not - sometimes you can bypass the President, and other times you need to ask for his consent. These are simply two different legal regimes and two different modes of state action. Turning the constitutional difference of competences into proof of the greatest hypocrisy in history looks impressive for the audience, but legally, not much comes of it 🤷‍♂️ (translated)

Judge Konrad Mielcarek issued a personal iron letter for the swindler Romanowski, a colleague of Ziobro. This means impunity for a member of the criminal group that has been plundering our country for 8 years. It is a spit in the face of Poland. I hope that the disgraceful decision of Mr. Mielcarek will be changed. (translated)