Search

Sture Fjäder wrote that, according to him, the support for his party was catastrophically low. He stated that he opposed red-blue cooperation and claimed that the Social Democrats wanted to tighten taxes. According to Fjäder, a tweet he found hinted that a decision had already been made about the party's shift to red-blue cooperation. He asked if the intention was for the party's support to drop to 12 percent, and responded that apparently that was the case. #vaalit2027 https://t.co/YVSaBNwGBR #politiikka #vaalit #kannatus (translated)

Topi Salin wrote that the headline about flying cars represented, in his opinion, Europe's economic suicide and the innovative power of the United States. He criticized the fact that the news highlighted legality and safety, and wondered whether readers would be primarily more interested in the technological novelty itself. Salin sarcastically predicted that Finnish social democrats and academic bourgeoisie opposing Elon Musk would jointly develop such a comprehensive regulatory framework that flying cars would not be seen in Finnish airspace for decades. #Eurooppa #innovaatio #sääntely (translated)

Jenny wrote that she wanted to see the Social Democrats in power, the May Day grants distributed, Nasima as the Minister of the Interior, and Sanna Marin defending Finland with her immense intelligence and love for her neighbor. She described the vision as a carnival. #politikka #Suomi #vappu (translated)

Katriina Reponen expressed her support for Elina Hiltunen and JukMantu. She wrote that she believes that the Finns Party could defeat the Social Democrats if people's eyes were opened during the winter, and hoped that the party would then enter the government together with the Christian Democrats. #politiikka #Suomi #vaalit (translated)

Sture Fjäder wrote that when the war broke out, there would be the president, the commander of the defense forces, the army, the prime minister, the minister of defense, the government, and parliament in the country. According to him, Marin would have no place to return to, but at most a job at the front line as a logistics provider for the soldiers. Fjäder also questioned Marin's cooking skills. #demarit https://t.co/PFt52sNPEr #sota #puolustus #politikka (translated)

Sammallahti wrote that in his view, the claim about the pampering of high-income earners in Finland was contradictory to the fact that the marginal tax rate exceeded 50 percent and that Finland's tax rate was among the highest in the world. He criticized the left for inciting discord with socialist class rhetoric and described the actions of the Social Democrats as ahistorical and foolish. https://t.co/otewTq3cL7 #Suomi #verot #politiikka (translated)

According to the author, the members of the National Coalition Party hoped that their group would leave the government and planned a campaign against the Finns Party. He said that Lindtman had stated that he would not join the government with the Finns Party at any price, but that Lindtman had not agreed to disclose whether the Social Democrats had visited. #politiikka #Suomi #vaalit #FI (translated)

Lucia-pulla asked whether the Security Police was listening and suggested that the Members of the European Parliament who voted against the resolution be placed under observation. She criticized the voters and accused them of acting in favor of terrorists and against the security of Europe. In the publication, she marked the Left, Greens, and Democrats and used hashtags related to terrorism, Islamism, jihadism, and reputational harm. #terrorismi #islamismi #mainehaitta (translated)

Martti Kosonen asked what capital Finland had gained from the blunders he described. He claimed that only in Spain and Finland was the majority of Members of the European Parliament completely misguided, and felt that adults should have been ashamed. He mentioned in his writing the SDP, the left, Sirpa Pietikäinen, and the Greens. #Suomi #politiikka #EU (translated)

Otto Juote wrote that, in his opinion, the YEL reform would not improve the situation for entrepreneurs during the current government term. He justified his view by saying that the law would not come into effect until 2028 and that it would not apply to any entrepreneur before the parliamentary elections in spring 2027. Juote argued that the timeline was politically intentional: according to him, the National Coalition Party could present itself as the initiator of the reform before the elections while avoiding responsibility for the consequences, which would only begin in the next term. He suspected that a blue-red government formed after the elections could annul or postpone the reform and anticipated that the SDP would demand its cancellation. Juote noted that no invoices based on the new model had yet been sent, nor had implementation decisions been made. According to him, the new parliament could repeal the law or postpone its entry into force with a simple legislative amendment, allowing the practices of the 2023 model to continue. He also questioned the information systems as an official basis for a delay extending to 2028 and assessed that the postponement would give the National Coalition Party the opportunity to leave the implementation of the reform to the next government. Juote claimed that the National Coalition Party did not want to reform YEL during any government term. #YEL #politiikka #uudistus (translated)

Martti Kosonen wrote that he finds it incredible that, according to him, Finland's green-left MEPs would not have wanted to slow down the activities of a terrorist organization. He mentioned Sirpa Pietikäinen among them and also named the Social Democrats, the Left, the Greens, and the National Coalition Party. #Suomi #politiikka #terrorismi (translated)

Kari previously mentioned that he used to laugh at people who wanted to break away from society's hustle, but now he said he appreciates those who can do it. He justified his view by claiming that hardworking men were taxed into poverty, the price of diesel was 2.5 euros per liter, the retirement age was 97 years, and the social democrats were winning the elections. https://t.co/RZxCXpzt2e #yhteiskunta #politiikka #verotus (translated)

Anatoli Karatammi stated that he had asked an artificial intelligence about the voting in Finland that has sparked discussions and its consequences, such as the bottle return issues. According to him, the artificial intelligence responded that only representatives of the Finns Party opposed the vote, and that representatives from the National Coalition Party, the Social Democrats, the Centre Party, and the Greens voted in favor of it. https://t.co/BJgKSkTM42 #Suomi #äänestys #tekoäly (translated)

Joni Juusela wrote that he was satisfied with the second place but was astonished by the strong support for the SDP. He wondered how a party, whose stance he considered consistently hollow, received over 20 percent support in the economic and security policy situation. Juusela urged Antti Lindtman to stop hiding. https://t.co/JYuK2qevLv #politiikka #demarit #kannatus (translated)

Venla Manninen wrote that, in her opinion, there was evidence presented regarding the effects of mass immigration on Western countries and that the situation in Germany, France, and Britain, as well as statistics on sexual crimes, unemployment benefits, prisoners, and gangs could not be ignored. She believed that the differences between parties were evident in how willing they were to address the problems of immigration. According to Manninen, the Finns Party was the only credible party to solve these issues. She criticized the green-left for focusing on multiculturalism and stated that the Social Democrats had voted against nearly all of the government's immigration tightening measures. She also highlighted the border security law, claiming that six social democrats, including the party's vice-chairman, voted against it. Manninen criticized the Centre Party for its lack of direction and noted that the party had announced it was aiming for 40,000 net immigrants per year in this electoral term. She described the National Coalition Party as contradictory: according to her, the party spoke about deporting criminals while simultaneously wanting tens of thousands of immigrants for low-wage jobs. Manninen argued that only a small portion of labor immigrants found employment in jobs requiring special skills and that nearly all directed towards low-wage sectors. Manninen believed that the Finns Party was advancing Finland's and the Finns' interests and dared to say things that, in her opinion, other parties did not acknowledge. However, she pointed out that no party could change laws on its own. She stated that without the Finns Party in government, concrete legislative actions would not be taken to address immigration issues, and instead, tightening measures might be lifted and rules loosened. #maahanmuutto #Suomi #politiikka (translated)

Yves Rocher stated that the situation in Paris was so chaotic in his opinion that those supporting Muslim immigration to Finland were, in his view, foolish and blind. He asked whether the SDP, Left Alliance, and Greens heard his message. #muslimimaahanmuutto #Suomi #politiikka (translated)

Matias Pajula wrote that the chairman of the SDP, Antti Lindtman, had been hiding for the third day. According to him, the SDP, which demanded answers from others immediately, was trying to silence its own serious misassessment of security policy. Pajula urged the party to take responsibility. #SDP #Turvallisuuspolitiikka #Vastuunkanto (translated)

The author described the day as a serious and sad reminder that, in his opinion, defense and security policy should not be left in the hands of the social democrats and other green-left. He wrote that the social democrats had voted in the same line as the Left Alliance and stated that security should be prioritized. #turvallisuus #puolustuspolitiikka #Suomi #FI (translated)