Search

Now, believe me, beyond everything, there is a quality that I discovered in the way of questioning, of interacting, of prosecutor Civardi that excites me. Really. The tone. The timing. The manners. The measured choice of every word, precisely because he is able to give each word its weight. And not just any weight: the exact one. Because Civardi really seems to weigh the words. One by one. In front of such a mind, in my opinion, you have little chance. There is a passage during the interview with Sempio where he says something like this. I’m going from memory: “…he reports having found the Feltrinelli bookstore closed, inexplicably.” (Pause) “On August 13” (micro-pause) “Monday” (If you manage to recover that passage in the video, feel free to post it below). Because in my opinion, everything is there. There’s the skill of a man that you will hardly be able to displace. The same that I found in that question asked to Cassese: a question that asked nothing, it sentenced. Or in the way he managed those two minutes with General Garofano. That’s where you see what an extremely intelligent, cultured, prepared, and capable person can become over time. But above all, there is one thing I am convinced of. A way of speaking like that, such confidence, comes not only from preparation or intelligence. I believe it also comes from the pride of knowing that one can defend one’s honesty. #Garlasco INEXPLICABLY... (That adverb…😍) (translated)

As a consultant, if I request files of analyses conducted, I MUST be able to consult ALL of them, positive, negative, null. If Previderè has considered that result valid, it is because that is the only one he received and worked on, he trusts that he received everything. #garlasco (translated)

The next monthly barometer conducted ENTIRELY after the Bardella affair and the first outbursts confirms that the RN is not penalized at all. Philippe is re-energized by the fear of having Mélenchon in the second round, who is also declining with this other institute. (translated)

Su questo punto il testo della direttiva è il frutto di un compromesso imposto dall’Italia in cambio del suo sì: il governo di Roma ha bloccato per mesi il via libera fino a ottenere una formulazione annacquata, consentendo al ministro della Giustizia Carlo Nordio di sostenere che una reintroduzione dell’abuso d’ufficio non sia necessaria, in quanto la norma Ue “non ha nulla a che vedere” con quella abrogata da noi. #Corruzione #ParlamentoEuropeo #AbusoDUfficio

“Chiarisco che nulla che assomigli anche lontanamente all’incidente aereo di questa mattina è emerso nell’aggiornamento sulla sicurezza con il primo ministro ieri sera. Niente di simile, nulla che lo ricordasse, neppure per un accenno”Dopo quelle dichiarazioni, il leader dell’opposizione Yair Lapid aveva chiesto un briefing urgente con il premier. #FlyDubai #Netanyahu #Israele

Black week in the German automotive sector - VW's software subsidiary Cariad plans the next major job cuts. Around 1000 more jobs are to be eliminated. Third major blow just today! Berlin carries a large part of the responsibility because they are doing absolutely nothing! Zero! Nothing. Next cut: Cariad currently employs around 4300 people and, according to information from Handelsblatt, plans to cut around 1000 more jobs. This could affect nearly a quarter of the remaining workforce. The timing and specific implementation of the job cuts are still open. Billion-euro savings plan: Between 2027 and 2031, Cariad's investments should decrease by a total of around 6.1 billion euros, according to an internal document. Additionally, the software subsidiary is expected to contribute another 400 million euros to improving the company's operating results at the beginning of the next decade. After the already announced job cuts, Cariad is now facing another significant reduction in its workforce and a stronger focus on its tasks. Thank you very much for this important information! Source: Handelsblatt (translated)

No. There is nothing to discuss. There is nothing to ascertain. If there are two opposing scientific results, particularly one positive and two negative, that element cannot be used as evidence against the suspect or the accused. This is due to the principle that a conviction must be issued beyond a reasonable doubt, for the presumption of innocence, for the "favor rei." Because we live in a rule of law state. The DNA of Chiara Poggi on the pedals of Alberto Stasi's bicycle was one of the seven pieces of evidence that led to his conviction. Judicially and humanly. In the ruling of the Court of Appeal in 2014, it is clearly stated that according to the RIS interviewed during the first-degree trial in 2009, that DNA was significant, highly cellular, and compatible with blood substance. In fact, it was so significant that white blood cells could be seen with the naked eye. And that the tests conducted in 2009 yielded negative results regarding the blood presumably because two years had passed. All this was reported. But they forgot to mention that the day after the positive result, two additional tests (which were incomprehensible given the clear result of the first test) had yielded negative results. And when the experts appointed by the first-degree judge asked for all the laboratory results related to the pedals, they only provided the positive one. I want to believe that I live in a place where those who hold great responsibilities take on the consequences of their actions or omissions. I am not interested if, according to the law, the consequences will not be criminal because they have become statute-barred in their illegality. I care that those responsibilities be clarified and made known to everyone. To everyone. And I am sure that will happen. #garlasco (translated)

Chiarisco. Nulla che assomigli anche lontanamente all’incidente aereo di questa mattina è emerso nell’aggiornamento sulla sicurezza con il premier di ieri sera. Niente di simile, nulla che lo ricordasse, neppure lontanamente“Chiarisco. Nulla che assomigli anche lontanamente all’incidente aereo di questa mattina è emerso nell’aggiornamento sulla sicurezza con il premier di ieri sera. Niente di simile, nulla che lo ricordasse, neppure lontanamente”, ha scritto su X Yair Lapid, leader del partito Yesh Atid, che ieri sera ha incontrato Netanyahu dopo le dichiarazioni di quest’ultimo. #Israele #FlyDubai #Sicurezza

Libé said it was an intervention by Marine Le Pen. In any case, it doesn't matter. Regarding Frontières, it cannot be a "right-wing Mediapart" for very clear reasons: 1) Not financially independent (therefore under pressure from shareholders). 2) Amateurism in management. See the thread from the freelancer who worked for them: the guy wasn't paid even though it was a small amount, has to beg to get the rest, etc. In short... Mediapart pays its salaries on time, without trying to negotiate via WhatsApp like a scammer. You can see that they are very short-term oriented: normally, they would try to take care of their reputation with freelancers... 3) They are constantly seeking buzz to exist, while Mediapart can remain silent for three months before releasing an investigation. It’s more serious. We see it now with the release of L’Infiltré: it’s atrocious and everything in it is reheated. One must be objective: yet, I am not a fan of Mediapart, far from it, but their management, at all levels, financial, editorial, investigations, etc., is probably the best that exists currently. (translated)

HØJESTERET HAR TALT Den 4. september sad jeg i Højesteret og fulgte sagen om en arabisk kvinde, der havde snydt sig til dansk indfødsret i 2015. I 2013 havde hun i ansøgningsskemaet nemlig afgivet en tro- og loveerklæring på, at hun ikke havde begået kriminelle forhold. I 2016 blev hun og ægtefællen imidlertid sigtet for at have udøvet grov vold mod sin på tidspunktet 4 årige datter. I 2017 blev hun og ægtefællen dømt for volden mod datteren. Det betyder, at kvinden, da hun ansøgte om dansk indfødsret, fortiede, at hun havde begået strafbare forhold og dermed afgav en falsk erklæring til myndighederne. Spørgsmålet for Højesteret var, om frakendelse vil være i strid med Danmarks internationale forpligtelser, herunder EMRK artikel 8. Højesteret har i dag stadfæstet, at hun frakendes sin danske indfødsret. Det glæder mig. Dommen er rigtig. Men efter min opfattelse bør loven ændres. Hvis en ansøger ikke opfyldte betingelserne, da Folketinget vedtog loven om indfødsret, bør indfødsretten anses for aldrig at være gyldigt erhvervet. Nullitet fra begyndelsen, ex tunc. Det bør skrives klart ind i indfødsretsloven og kommende love om indfødsrets meddelelse, så forventnings- og indrettelseshensyn ikke kan bruges til at fastholde en indfødsret opnået på et urigtigt grundlag. For man skal ikke kunne opnå ved domstolene, hvad man aldrig ville have fået af Folketinget, hvis sandheden havde været kendt. Det er alene Folketinget, der efter grundlovens § 44, stk. 1, bestemmer, hvem der kan opnå dansk indfødsret. Sprogkravet og indfødsretsprøven bør samtidig skærpes markant. Ved min overværing af sagen i retten undrede jeg mig meget over, hvordan hun kunne opfylde sprogkravet og bestå indfødsretsprøven, når en arabisk tolk måtte oversætte hele retsmødet for hende. Højesteret bemærker da også i dommen, at hun kun forstår og taler dansk i meget begrænset omfang. For hvis hun efter 27 år i Danmark ikke kan begå sig på dansk, hvordan kunne hun så opfylde kravene for 12 år siden. Måske er der givet dispensation. Det mangler jeg fortsat svar på. Og det leder mig hen til, at det bør være sådan, at ansøgernes identitet kontrolleres biometrisk ved deltagelse i prøven, så myndighederne senere kan kontrollere, om den, der tog prøven, er den samme som den, der får udstedt et dansk pas. Men altså, vi bør bare lade være med at massedele vores indfødsret ud som bolsjer. Jeg minder om, at der pt. er over 19.000 ansøgninger om dansk indfødsret. Det er hovedrystende. #Indfødsret #Danmark #Rettigheder

"Mi sono limitato a fotografare la sentenza di ieri. E proprio perché è una sentenza limitata, perché non ci dice chi sono gli assassini di Regeni, noi vogliamo che si faccia piena luce su questo. Non abbiamo mai mollato e non copriamo nulla. Vale più l'azione diplomatica che il clamore, perché noi non abbiamo mai rinunciato a insistere con le autorità egiziane, in ogni incontro, su quello che per noi è fondamentale, scoprire la verità, scoprire chi sono gli assassini di Regeni"Intanto il ministro degli Esteri Antonio Tajani si dichiara "stupito dalle polemiche" per le sue dichiarazioni dopo la sentenza. #Regeni #Giustizia #Egitto

"io sono stupito dalle polemiche. Mi sono limitato a fotografare la sentenza di ieri. E proprio perché è una sentenza limitata, perché non ci dice chi sono gli assassini di Regeni, noi vogliamo che si faccia piena luce su questo. Non abbiamo mai mollato e non copriamo nulla. Vale più l'azione diplomatica che il clamore, perché noi non abbiamo mai rinunciato a insistere con le autorità egiziane, in ogni incontro, su quello che per noi è fondamentale, scoprire la verità, scoprire chi sono gli assassini di Regeni"Lo ha detto il ministro degli Esteri Antonio Tajani a margine di un evento. #Regeni #Giustizia #Diplomazia