Search

The author of the entry r00t accused Leśkiewicz of being evasive and possibly not understanding his own argumentation. He pointed out that Article 7, point 13 of the Public Procurement Law defined critical services, but — in his opinion — did not constitute grounds for refusing to provide public information. He emphasized that it concerned the total cost of the event, not the protection procedures for Nawrocki, and asked how revealing just the amount could threaten national security. He added that Leśkiewicz and the law office might not see the difference between protecting sensitive information and the obligation to account for public expenditures, or they chose to hide something from the Polish people. #Prawo #Transparentność #FinansePubliczne (translated)

Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz wrote that the lieutenant of the Polish Army was acquitted that day by the Military District Court in Warsaw. According to him, the soldier was not proven to have neglected his duties during service on the border with Belarus. In November 2023, the lieutenant accidentally shot a migrant. Kosiniak-Kamysz informed that the soldier had been receiving legal assistance and support from the Military Soldier Rights Protection Team from the very beginning. He emphasized that soldiers performing their duties should not be left without help, even in difficult situations. #WojskoPolskie #wsparcie #prawo (translated)

The author of the entry considered the vote on legislation abolishing the protection of the right to life of unborn children to be a disgrace for the MPs of the current coalition. He wrote that it is the duty of parliamentarians to improve the protection of health and life, and not to move toward what he described as a "civilization of death." #ochronaprawa #życie #zdrowie #PL (translated)

The author of the entry questioned Bogucki's reasoning regarding the refusal of the president to take the oath and the actions of the management of the Constitutional Tribunal's Chancellery. He indicated that it concerns separate legal issues related to different entities and their competencies. He referred to Article 194 paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and Articles 4 and 5 of the Act on the Status of Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, as well as to the judgment of the Tribunal in case K 34/15. As he wrote, the Tribunal recognized in it that taking the oath from a properly elected judge is the president's obligation. He added that even assuming that the oath taken in the Sejm was ineffective, it would not automatically exclude the legal assessment of Nawrocki's previous inaction. The author stated that there is no logical contradiction here and accused Bogucki of reducing two separate issues to a single political slogan. #prawo #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

The amendment to the regulations regarding counteracting mobbing and unequal treatment will come into effect on November 5, introducing new obligations for employers, such as creating internal preventive procedures and increasing compensation. #mobbing #dyskryminacja #praca (translated)

Netflix is conducting its largest layoffs since 2022, reducing its workforce by about 1,000 employees, and Peter Rice is taking on the role of head of the film department in connection with a reorganization aimed at attracting viewers and creating new hits. #Netflix #zmiany #film (translated)

The author of the entry accused Waldemar of omitting Article 154, paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. He wrote that if the first attempt to appoint a government failed, the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers would be elected by the Sejm, and the President would be obliged to appoint them. He emphasized that the President would not have the right of veto in this procedure and indicated that this happened in 2023. The author also considered the possibility that Nawrocki would refuse to take the oath, similar to the case of the oath of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal. He assessed that this would lead to a serious constitutional crisis since the Constitution did not provide a straightforward mechanism for forcing the President to perform this duty. He added that based on Article 162, paragraph 3, the outgoing government could continue to perform its duties despite the Sejm electing a new cabinet. He pointed out that such a scenario would mean that the body responsible for ensuring compliance with the Constitution could prevent the execution of its provisions. #Konstytucja #Polska #KryzysPolityczny (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk questioned whether the Sejm documented the verification of Maciej Berek's qualifications for selection to the Constitutional Tribunal. He wrote that Andrzej Filipowicz requested documents from the Chancellery of the Sejm and the Justice and Human Rights Committee, but the received response — according to Filipowicz’s account — did not mention documents from the bar association confirming Berek's qualifications and experience. Kusznieruk pointed out a discrepancy between Sejm print number 3006 from August 14, 2026, which stated that Berek had been practicing as a legal advisor since 2001 and actively for 25 years, and a certificate from OIRP in Warsaw dated September 3, 2026. According to the data he cited, Berek was entered on the list on June 26, 2002, and obtained his qualifications after taking the oath on September 25, 2002. The certificate listed the periods of registered legal practice from January 1, 2006, to July 31, 2009, and from August 1, 2012, to the date of issuance but did not include a list of civil law contracts. The author quoted responses from the Senate Chancellery and the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights, according to which Berek did not hold the position of legal advisor there nor provided legal assistance in that role. The Supreme Audit Office informed, however, that he was a legal advisor and performed duties aligned with the tasks of advisors, although the appointment of a controller as a legal advisor was not possible. Kusznieruk emphasized that the legal qualification of this work and the declared civil law contracts remained in dispute. According to Filipowicz's summary, if the two periods of Berek's work as a legal advisor in NIK are counted, his tenure was 1,345 days, or about 3 years and 8 months; without those periods, it was 387 days related to running a law office. Kusznieruk noted that this was an analysis of available materials and not a binding decision regarding the failure to meet the requirements. He called for determining who in the Sejm was responsible for verification and what documents were examined, indicating that any potential criminal liability under Article 231 § 1 or § 3 of the Penal Code would require demonstrating statutory prerequisites. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #InformacjaPubliczna (translated)

The author of the entry criticized Karol Nawrocki for selectively referencing the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and accused him and Bogucki of omitting provisions related to international law. He pointed to articles 87, 9, 90, and 91, which—he wrote—are significant for understanding the sources of law and Poland's obligations. The author argued that Article 87 defines the sources of law, not the institutions authorized to interpret it. He also noted that the opinions of the Venice Commission are not legally binding, whereas the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and the rulings of the Court of Justice of the EU are subject to different principles arising from Poland's treaty obligations. He reminded that according to Article 126, paragraph 2, Nawrocki, while performing the duties of the President of the Republic of Poland, was to ensure compliance with the Constitution. He accused him of undermining the integrity of fulfilling this duty by omitting parts of its provisions. #KonstytucjaRP #Prawo #Polska (translated)

The author of the post identified the acting president as someone who was previously linked to supplying prostitutes, the fan environment, and crime, and also called him a pathological liar and manipulator. He also wrote that judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are elected by the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and that after their election, they assume the status of judges. https://t.co/9j6z8bGNm2 #Polityka #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PL (translated)

Marek Łangalis wrote that in 2015 a person close to him working at a German employment office did not want to talk about the effects of the slogan "Refugees welcome," believing that the arrival of refugees would revive the stagnant German labor market. According to him, her main duty became the professional activation of people she ironically referred to as "engineers." Łangalis added that he now considers her the biggest racist he knows and that she uses terms that cannot be repeated in a cultured gathering. #imigracja #rynekpracy #dyskryminacja (translated)

The author r00t🇪🇺 accused Bogucki of selective representation of the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling from December 3, 2015, in case K 34/15. He pointed out that Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution entrusts the Sejm with the election of judges of the Tribunal, while the obligation to take an oath before the President results from the law. He referred to points 8.5.1, 8.5.3, and 8.6 of the justification. As he wrote, the Tribunal considered the oath to be an element added by the legislator to the constitutional procedure, and its acceptance by the President was regarded as an obligation. He added that the Tribunal questioned the interpretation of provisions that would not foresee the immediate taking of an oath. The author assessed that the President does not approve the choice made by the Sejm and cannot, based on statutory competence, co-decide on the composition of the Tribunal. He accused Bogucki of omitting parts of the ruling and using it to provoke opposition to the government and to present its actions as an attack on the constitutional order. Referring to Karol Nawrocki, the author reminded that Article 126, paragraph 1 of the Constitution defines the President of the Republic of Poland as the highest representative of the state and the guarantor of continuity of power, while paragraph 3 indicates that he performs his tasks on the principles specified in the Constitution and laws. He wrote that using the authority of the Constitution to justify a political position does not correspond to those obligations. #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polityka (translated)

Waldemar criticized the statements about the constitutional crisis and the possibility of the state being taken over by Czarzasty. He argued that the constitution provides that in case the president is unable to act, his duties are performed by the Marshal of the Sejm, and reminded that Nawrocki had previously expressed a similar position. According to Waldemar, Berek and the others took an oath because the president refused, and the Venice Commission allowed for other solutions when the president blocks actions. The author pointed out that the opponents of this decision used offensive terms and referred to the "strength of the nation." Przydacz, as Waldemar reported, raised the alarm that the Constitutional Tribunal might soon declare Nawrocki unfit to perform his duties. Waldemar assessed that the critics reacted with panic because they were losing control over the Tribunal, which they had treated as their property for years. He added that it was not Czarzasty who abdicated or was lost, but his opponents who had weakened the Tribunal for years and were now screaming about succession and the use of force. He appealed for them to apply the constitution regardless of whether its provisions suited them. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)

Pope Leo XIV, after leaving the hospital, delivered a strong address to the faithful from the window of the Apostolic Palace, thanking them for their prayers and support, and emphasizing the importance of giving God what is due to Him in relation to the responsibility for human duties. #Papież #Watykan #Modlitwa (translated)

The services in action described an incident in which witnesses suspected that the driver of a Porsche was drunk and tried to stop him. According to the author, the driver assaulted several people, including an elderly woman, whom he hit several times, and with one of the blows — an elbow to the head — he knocked her onto the hood of the car. Another witness was said to have been hit while the driver was fleeing the scene. The author cited a statement from the spokesperson for the Warsaw II District Police Headquarters, who reported that the case is being pursued upon a private accusation, and the police had not received a notification. The services in action claimed that in this situation, a notification from the victim is not required, and the police and prosecutors should initiate proceedings. They referred to Article 217a § 1 of the Penal Code and appealed to the police and prosecutors to take action. #Bezpieczeństwo #Prawo #Policja (translated)

After the resignation of Radosław Piesiewicz from the position of president of the Polish Olympic Committee, the situation at PKOl is becoming a key challenge, and the new acting president Marian Kmita has the task of rebuilding the organization's image and conducting an audit to determine the current state after years of uncertainty and controversy. #PKOl #RadosławPiesiewicz #sport (translated)

The author turned to President Karol Nawrocki, writing that threatening war is unacceptable, but the dangers of it should not be underestimated by the head of state and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. He added that the authorities have a duty to prudently shape the awareness and strategic vigilance of the Polish people. https://t.co/5AUNRyV8xd #Polska #wojna #bezpieczeństwo #PL (translated)