Search

The argument of interest on interest was derogatory for the employer, as the employer, according to the writer, was not punished but simply did not have to pay wages to someone who was not at the workplace. The writer questioned why the employer should be forced to pay for something it neither chose nor could influence. The writer also stated that Danish companies were exempt from employer contributions and that Denmark had a labor market contribution of 8 percent, which was deducted directly from employees' salaries to finance labor market policy. According to the writer, this meant that other employees essentially financed individuals who were not working. The writer argued that those referring to Denmark should therefore first advocate for the abolition of employer contributions and then that employees should pay for others' absences from work. The writer described the article as very poor. #arbetsmarknad #företagande #politiskdebatt (translated)

Carl Eos agreed with Jimmie Åkesson's reasoning in Expressen about the Sweden Democrats' role in cooperation with the center-right parties. Åkesson had written that the Sweden Democrats (SD) had been driving many reforms, but that the parties holding ministerial positions had received visibility when the reforms were implemented. He also pointed out that the cooperation had limited SD and asked why voters would choose the party over the Moderates if the center-right was perceived as good enough even on issues where SD had taken the lead. Eos wrote that the center-right parties had been able to showcase successes within SD's strong policy areas, while SD had not made corresponding advances in other areas. He argued that the parliamentary election in 2026 would largely be about issues where SD was weaker and, to a large extent, not about policy issues. Eos also noted that both Ulf Kristersson and Jimmie Åkesson had said that the time after Tidö had begun, and wrote that this would likely create discussion. https://t.co/JWjMHlH2Ri #Sverigedemokraterna #politiskdebatt #val2026 (translated)

Daniel Schatz wrote that the Green Party's English sister party had voted through a motion that described Zionism as racism, with 1,022 votes against 813. He claimed that the decision thereby made resistance to Israel's existence official party policy and stated that no established Western European party had previously gone so far. Schatz asked whether the Green Party would distance itself from this stance. #Miljöpartiet #politiskdebatt #sionism (translated)

He wrote that masked individuals whom he called "students" in France had set a woman on fire, assaulted police officers, looted stores, and set schools on fire. He dismissed the idea that the events were due to dissatisfaction with the curriculum or the number of teachers, calling those who believed that naive or blind. According to E, the individuals did not want to learn anything but to cause trouble, and he blamed the French far-left LFI and hooligans. #Sverige #Frankrike #politiskdebatt (translated)

Christian Peterson wrote that the newspaper ETC, which he described as left-extreme, had received over 405 million kronor in state media support between 2005 and 2026. He stated that the support for 2026 amounted to 13,333,914 kronor and questioned whether it was reasonable. #mediestöd #vänsterextremism #politiskdebatt (translated)

Madness, axe robbery, assault on a police officer who was left disabled. I warned and shared videos about him back in 2021. But he is still in the country, and why is that? Well, a huge naive majority in the Parliament has granted him citizenship. Remember that Alex Vanopslagh, Inger Støjberg, Mona Juul, and many more have NEVER voted against granting citizenship. I wonder if the parties that have ensured that Danes are forced to encounter him again... actually feel any shame and guilt? They should! #Danmark #politiskdebat #retskriminalitet (translated)

When Dagens ETC and Expo investigate funding, it is journalism. When Christian Peterson does it, it is an attack. #leftlogic #vänsterlogik #jämställdhet #journalistik #politiskdebatt (translated)

Storhetsvansinne i Centerpartiet? Birgitta Ohlsson hotar med att bli politisk vilde om Centerpartiet öppnar för samarbete med SD. Alltså på riktigt – vad tror Centerpartiet att de är? Röda linjer. Ultimatum. Krav på vilka andra får och inte får samarbeta med. Som om svensk politik ska rätta sig efter Centerpartiets villkor. Ni är inte navet som resten av riksdagen kretsar kring. Så stora är ni faktiskt inte. https://t.co/wlnBrhi093 #svpol #Centerpartiet #politiskdebatt

Chefen på valnämndens kansli i Stockholm bekräftar att man upplevt att en specifik kandidat från islamistiska kommunistpartiet VPK haft förkryssade valsedlar i valsedelställen och att man upplevt sig tvingade att kontakta partiet för att få oskicket att upphöra. Det handlar knappast om ”rasism” utan att SvD råkat berätta saker vi inte skulle få veta. #val2023 #demokrati #politiskdebatt

Det här är alltså Miljöpartiets stora prioritet nu: Att förfölja Aron Flam! Det är liksom inte konstigt att Miljöpartiet är Sveriges mest hatade parti utanför de egna totalt humorbefriade leden. Tydligen är nazifitta det nya N-ordet! https://t.co/no5PdSJ1HJ #Sverige #Miljöpartiet #politiskdebatten

I en krönika i Dagens Nyheter argumenterar Björn Wiman för att Sverigedemokraternas inflytande över svensk offentlighet äntligen har brutits, vilket ger en möjlighet till en mer verklighetstrogen och frispråkig politisk diskussion. #Sverigedemokraterna #politiskdebatt #svenskpolitik

@pascalidou @thelemoncurd Ingen med invandrarbakgrund är evigt skyldig Socialdemokraterna något eller något annat parti för den delen. Det är en märklig syn på medborgarskap att man ska rösta rätt och tiga still för att ens föräldrar en gång fick komma. Då är man inte medborgare. Då är man en evig gäst. #medborgarskap #politiskdebatt #mångfald