Eleonora Aloise criticized the communication management of Jannik Sinner, arguing that three months without information was too long and that fans were only asking for a bit of transparency, not intimate details or medical records. She wrote that what was known had come from leaked videos, gossip newsletters, occasional sources, and geolocations of restaurants. Aloise also contested the relentless defenses of the tennis player and the rhetoric that he owed nothing to anyone. She recalled that, in her opinion, millions of fans made sacrifices to buy tickets and criticized the tournaments that asked for a last-minute announcement of a withdrawal. She defined Sinner as a public figure and a multimillion-dollar business, as well as an important figure for fans, and argued that justifying him on every issue was not doing him any favors. According to Aloise, communication had dulled every nuance and prevented the complexity of the person from being told. She wrote that injuries happened and that it wasn't necessary to keep them secret. She concluded by saying that fans would welcome Sinner with open arms upon his return, but perhaps with less naïveté. #sinner #tennis #comunicazione #trasparenza #tennis (translated)




