Search

Monika Borkowska informed that Piotr's wife spoke out for the first time regarding his detention. The woman stated that the attempt to identify her husband did not follow the proper procedures, which led him to suspect that the individuals intervening with him were impersonating police officers. She accused the officers of unjustified assault and detention and appealed for their superiors to take consequences. Borkowska conveyed that Piotr's wife asked why the officers did not provide the basis for identification, the police officer did not introduce himself in the recording, and the female officer violated her husband's personal and even intimate space. She also wanted to know if the superiors would react to what she described as unprofessional conduct. The author of the post stated that she remained in contact with the woman, who asked for peace and anonymity. According to Borkowska, Piotr's wife thanked those supporting the family and those who published information and recordings online. The post also tagged Republika TV, Tomasz Sakiewicz, Marcin Kierwiński, Donald Tusk, K. Gałecka, Michał Rachoń, Jarosław Kaczyński, and GP Clubs. #policja #sprawiedliwość #prawaCzłowieka (translated)

Jacek Ozdoba stated that the recordings published by the police revealed, in his opinion, numerous irregularities during Piotr's arrest. He questioned why the officers did not provide a specific reason for requesting documents and emphasized the knife issue, although — according to the account presented — Piotr did not use it. Ozdoba demanded clarification on whether the policewoman sustained injuries and what evidence exists for that. He assessed that the recordings undermined information regarding her health status. He also pointed to allegations concerning actions taken after the arrest, which — as he wrote — could indicate the possibility of a crime being committed. He also questioned the conditioning of contact with a lawyer on providing personal data, reminding about the arrested person's right to contact a defender as stipulated in Article 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He asked whether he was allowed to notify a close person, whether the measures applied were necessary and proportional, and whether he was provided with adequate medical assistance. According to a statement by Piotr W., which Ozdoba referred to, comprehensive medical examinations were not conducted. Ozdoba also raised concerns regarding the legal grounds for the arrest and pointed to the possibility of judicial review based on Article 246 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his opinion, the actions of the officers should also be assessed in light of Article 231 of the Penal Code. He wrote that a uniform does not exempt one from responsibility, and an arrest does not strip a person of their rights. He added that the course of actions and communication by the police, which he assessed presented many facts in a way inconsistent with reality, raised justified concerns of provocation. #Polska #Policja #Prawo (translated)

The Warsaw police reported that the detained man initially refused to contact a lawyer or any other legal representative and only later decided to take advantage of it. According to the police, the man also refused to provide personal details, even during examinations in the hospital. The police stated that they respected his rights and could not force him to seek legal assistance. They announced the release of a recording of the actions involving the detainee and denied reports that he had a head wound. #Policja #Prawo #Zatrzymanie (translated)

Kamil Zaradkiewicz described a possible scenario in which the President of the Constitutional Tribunal, Bogdan Święczkowski, would be arrested by the police as a result of provocation. As he wrote, the remaining judges would be forced to participate in a general assembly with individuals he referred to as usurpers, in order to lift Święczkowski's immunity. The consequences would include charges, suspension, and arrest of the president, followed by the takeover of the Tribunal. #TK #Polska #prawo (translated)

Marzena Nykiel wrote that it would soon be 24 hours since Piotr's detention, and his attorney still had not received any information. She stated that the police confirmed during the night that the detainee did not want an attorney, but he had not even contacted his wife since the previous day. She asked where the human rights defenders were, including the Ombudsman for Citizens' Rights. #Polska #zatrzymanie (translated)

Marek Markowski wrote that a woman in a police uniform lay down on a man who was being pinned down by officers and screamed at him using an offensive term. He claimed that the man could not comply with the officers' orders and described the incident as an assault, not an arrest. #policja #przemoc #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that, in connection with the detention of Piotr at the headquarters of the Association of Free Speech, she filed a notification of suspected crime committed by the intervening police officers. She wrote that the activities involved MPs Dorota Arciszewska-Mielewczyk, Jarosław Kaczyński, Marek Suski, and Jan Mosiński, and the police still did not allow the defender to access the detainee nor did they disclose his whereabouts. #Polska #Policja #Prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski wrote that he was at the Capital Police Headquarters with attorney Magda Prządka, where Mr. Piotr was supposed to be transported from the police station on Wilcza Street. According to Malewski, the police were still preventing contact with the detained person, and the duty officer did not know whether the man was present. #policja #zatrzymanie #sprawiedliwość (translated)

The author of the entry claimed that the prosecutor's office had gathered evidence and applied for the detention of Obajtek, which — in his opinion — explained his recent behavior in Inowrocław. He warned against the arguments of the defenders of those he described as embezzlers, and argued that the case was not about lower fuel prices, but about draining strategic reserves in time for the elections. https://t.co/9mdbyo9VYA #Obajtek #prokuratura #polityka #PL (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that in 2023 he notified the prosecutor's office regarding the pre-election fuel prices of Orlen and demanded the initiation of an investigation. He assessed that later events confirmed the validity of his appeal, pointing to the motion to lift the immunity and arrest Obajtek. He added that immunity should not protect against accountability. https://t.co/dBHcITynvg #Polska #Wybory #Paliwa #PL (translated)

The author wrote that the National Public Prosecutor's Office informed about submitting a request to the European Parliament for the lifting of Obajtek's immunity and consent for his arrest. According to the author, the case arose from an investigation initiated after his notification to the Internal Security Agency from October 2023 regarding the "electoral" consumption of strategic reserves, namely base oil, from caverns near Inowrocław. #polityka #immunitet #śledztwo #PL (translated)

TVP Info reported that Minister Waldemar Żurek submitted a request to the European Parliament to lift the immunity of Daniel Obajtek. According to the portal, investigators wanted to charge the former CEO of Orlen and obtain permission for his detention, forced appearance, and temporary arrest. https://t.co/eNQXZvLMRc https://t.co/L1S860woKT #immunitet #Polska #politka (translated)

Tomasz Trela wrote that a motion to lift Daniel Obajtek's immunity, his detention, and arrest was ready. He claimed that there were irregularities at Orlen, and the former president would bear responsibility and punishment. He added that everyone is equal before the law. #immunitet #prawo #korupcja (translated)