Search

From the court - tennis information wrote that watching Agnieszka Radwańska and Angelique Kerber together on the court again evoked nostalgia. He added that Radwańska fought to make up for her losses in the second set until the end, but defending champion Kerber won 6-2, 6-4 and advanced to the final of the Luxembourg Ladies Tennis Masters. The author thanked the players for the spectacle. #zkortu #tenis #sport #LuxembourgLadiesTennisMasters (translated)

The Night Penguin wrote that the right supports Polish uniformed services, but — as he stated — when Donald Tusk is in power, he defends a man who allegedly attacked officers and fled during an attempt to identify him. He added that the incident was recorded on film. #Polska #Prawica #Mundur (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that Minister Paweł Szefernaker, head of the Cabinet of the President of Poland Karol Nawrocki, spoke during a demonstration in defense of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal. Szefernaker conveyed thanks to the participants on behalf of the president and stated that Nawrocki intends to uphold the Constitution. Szefernaker accused Donald Tusk's government of destroying the foundations of the state and attempting to subordinate independent institutions to itself. He cited media reports about a team in the Office of the Prime Minister that had prepared 50 cases for the Tribunal in the event of it being taken over by Tusk's people. He also assessed that after taking over public television and the prosecutor's office, the government may seek to take control of the Tribunal, and subsequently the National Bank of Poland, undermining the president's status. The minister pointed out that during Karol Nawrocki's campaign in 2025, his supporters won despite — as he said — pressure and attacks from the state apparatus. In conclusion, he once again thanked the participants of the demonstration for defending the independence of the Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

The author of the post encouraged following the accounts of Ordo Iuris lawyers — Magda Majkowska, Magda Przadka, and Bartosz Malewski. He claimed they are at the center of events, defending the victims of the brutality of officials and government lies, and coordinating legal assistance for demonstrators at the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/E1H05uRTZu #prawaCzłowieka #adwokaci #demonstracje #PL (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized those protesting in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, claiming they were manipulated by the politics of PiS and Karol Nawrocki. According to him, the protesters defended abuses related to the Tribunal, which — as he wrote — PiS had previously destroyed and subordinated to party interests. Mazguła reminded that the Constitutional Tribunal consists of 15 judges elected individually by the Sejm for 9 years, according to Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. He asked why Nawrocki does not accept the oaths of the judges if he does not elect them. He argued that the Tribunal should protect citizens against abuses of power, including from the government of Donald Tusk. The author accused Jarosław Kaczyński, Nawrocki, and the television stations he described as spreading Russian propaganda of inciting protests. He urged Poles not to support — as he put it — political oppression, and encouraged photographing and documenting the participants of the protests. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #BronimyKonstytucji #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that the prosecutor's actions against the soldier who accidentally shot a migrant trying to illegally enter Poland during the chase were yet another case of legal pressure being exerted on soldiers and officers defending the border. He asked how they are supposed to cope with the war. https://t.co/G3Gx6DFsPP #Polska #granica #bezpieczeństwo #PL (translated)

Konrad Krasuski described the chaos surrounding the zoo in Łączna, where — as he wrote — there were clashes with the police, and officers with shields pushed back residents defending the facility. He presented both sides of the dispute. According to Krasuski's account, the prosecution alleged that hundreds of animals were being abused and malnourished, and some were suffering or had died. Five people were arrested and charged; none admitted guilt. The prosecution also requested the temporary arrest of the zoo director. The owners, on the other hand, described the confiscation of the animals as an unprecedented action. Krasuski wrote that residents were coming to the zoo to block transports, and accusations of animal theft were appearing online. He also mentioned revealed screenshots of conversations from the foundation about the division of the animals, a recording warning about the action, and concerns regarding the safety of the transport, conditions in the new places, and the reliability of the experts. Krasuski stated that he was on-site and spoke with people involved in the case, including anonymously with an employee of the Veterinary Inspection. He also attended a press conference held by the prosecution and spoke with a lawyer for the owners. He announced that he would look into what initiated the case and how events escalated the previous night. #ZooŁączna #protest #ochronazwierząt (translated)

Jakub Pomezański described the recent events at the zoo in Łączna, which he called destroyed and robbed as well as the best in Poland. He claimed that individuals associated with suspicious foundations secured the most valuable animals and transported them to the Netherlands, and on site, bones of animals resembling goats were found, which, in his opinion, did not look like they had been lying in the ground for a long time. Pomezański wrote that the owner of the zoo was imprisoned based on charges he considered absurd. He also accused the foundations of lacking interest in the remaining animals, which were said to be roaming the area uncontrolled. According to him, some animals escaped through a fallen fence, which appeared to be damaged from the inside, undermining the theory that people gathered outside the zoo were defending the facility. He added that the police arrested a mother who came with children to the zoo to — as he wrote — defend it from destruction. Pomezański stated that the case raises his suspicions and expressed concern that since similar actions might affect a large company, individuals could also be at risk. He noted that the photos depicted the zoo in August 2025 and expressed outrage at those who would want to destroy it. #ZOO #Polska #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Magda wrote that Mateusz Grzeda was conditionally released by the District Court in Wrocław, not by the Civic Platform. According to her, Grzeda worked outside the prison, used leaves six times, and returned each time without problems. He had not been disciplined, received 28 awards, and the court assessed his criminological prognosis as positive. He was placed under the supervision of a probation officer until the end of the probationary period. Magda pointed out that this information was also included in the material of the Republic. She added that for 11 years, Grzeda has been running a pizzeria, employing people and functioning in society, which she believed indicated the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Magda criticized the outrage from Karol Nawrocki's environment regarding Grzeda. She wrote that Wielki Bu and Olo had been long-time acquaintances of Nawrocki, although during the campaign he tried to distance himself from them, and they did not deny this acquaintance. According to her, both were in custody: Wielki Bu faced charges of involvement in an organized criminal group, trafficking large quantities of drugs, car theft, and fraud, while Olo faced charges of involvement in an organized criminal group and arms trafficking. Magda also wrote that Nawrocki boasted about rehabilitating people from such an environment, but she assessed that it brought poor results. Finally, she compared the outrage concerning the pizzeria in Jagodno with the approach to the group of football hooligans. #resocjalizacja #Polska #przestępczość (translated)

Waldemar wrote that retirees, under the influence of years of Jarosław Kaczyński's politics and the venomous message of TV Republika, had lost touch with reality. He accused them of defending the Tribunal, which, he claimed, they had previously dismantled and politicized themselves. He added that those gathered outside his building believed they were defending Poland, but in reality, they were defending the remnants of Kaczyński's power. #Polska #polityka #emeryci (translated)

The author of the post questioned Duda about what specific actions and legal grounds justified his accusation of attempting to forcefully take control of the Constitutional Tribunal. He also asked whether the call for mobilization of members of the NSZZ "Solidarity" was meant to defend the competencies of the Sejm, the new judges, or the current personal arrangement in the Tribunal. He recalled that Article 1 of the law on trade unions defines the role of unions as representing and defending the rights and professional and social interests of employees. He emphasized that he did not question Duda's right to speak on constitutional matters or to organize peaceful demonstrations, but asked why he involved union structures in defending the current leadership of the Tribunal. Referring to the squabbles before the Tribunal, the author of the post asked whether Duda assessed the risk of escalation and anticipated security measures before the call for mobilization. He cited Article 57 of the Constitution and the obligations of organizers and leaders of assemblies arising from the law on assemblies. He asked whether Duda could guarantee that participants would not block entrances to institutions or hinder the legal actions of officials. The author stressed that merely declaring peaceful intentions, in his opinion, does not ensure safety, and asked whether Duda informed participants about the risk of confrontation. He also pointed out that "Solidarity" should not be, as he put it, the political backing of any party, and finally asked whether Duda would personally take responsibility for organizing the assembly and ensuring the safety of its participants. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Solidarność #PrawaCzłowieka (translated)

Kamil Zaradkiewicz described the photo as another symbol. He wrote that the entrance, where President Bogdan Święczkowski was supposed to defend access from people who unlawfully intruded into the Constitutional Tribunal, led to a corridor with the judges' offices. According to Zaradkiewicz, this part of the building was designated solely for judges and those directly working with them in the Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska #Sędziowie (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that Polish patriots defended the Constitutional Tribunal, and the police beat opposition members from the time of the Polish People's Republic. He condemned those who, as he stated, broke their oath of loyalty to Poland. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny https://t.co/TYoyQi7nkn #Polska #Patriotyzm #Opozycja #PL (translated)

The author of the entry described the situation as an attack on the Constitutional Tribunal and claimed that the SOP broke into the building that M. Berek entered. He wrote that Berek had previously been a minister in Donald Tusk's government, did not meet the statutory requirements for taking up the position of a judge in the Constitutional Tribunal, and had not taken an oath before the President of the Republic of Poland. He also mentioned Poles defending the Constitutional Tribunal and included a link. https://t.co/USIJBRuDkS #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska #Sąd #PL (translated)