Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have gone directly to the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the fastest route to have the matter decided publicly by a court? (translated)
Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have filed directly with the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the quickest route to have the matter publicly decided by a court? (translated)
🚨 Thierry Henry 🇫🇷 on the Cristiano Ronaldo 🇵🇹 case: " I HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUDGE HOW IT ENDS. ❌ I’m talking about the player, what he has done and what he represents. I like to highlight his way of being, his obsession with football and records. Without his obsessions, we wouldn’t have known this player. We have experienced extraordinary things with him. I HAVE ENORMOUS RESPECT FOR HIM. Just as I do for Messi." (translated)
🚨🚨 COMMUNIQUE FROM FC BARCELONA!!! THE BLAUGRANA CLUB DENIES ANY NEW UEFA PROCEDURE ENGAGED AGAINST BARÇA. ❌ “In response to reports published regarding the alleged reactivation of the UEFA procedure in the Negreira case, FC Barcelona wishes to clarify the following: UEFA HAS NOT OPENED ANY NEW PROCEDURE AGAINST FC BARCELONA. ❗️ The procedure was initiated in 2023, with the appointment of two investigators who have since taken the action they deemed appropriate. The Club has always responded to all their requests. These procedures have not been reopened because they have never been closed. The UEFA statement confirms the receipt of the documentation submitted by Real Madrid and indicates that the investigators will evaluate it as part of the ongoing investigation. The same text expressly refers, twice, to an investigation and review that are “ongoing.” It does not announce the opening, reopening, or reactivation of any procedure, nor any assessment of the substance or value of the documentation provided. It invites the investigators to determine what action, if any, they deem appropriate regarding this documentation. To date, they have not made new requests to FC Barcelona and have not forwarded Real Madrid's complaint to the club. Should they do so, the Club will respond accordingly, as it has done so far. In accordance with the applicable legislation governing this matter, these procedures are subject to the outcome of the criminal case currently being heard in Spain and will continue to be so. Since the beginning of the investigation, FC Barcelona has continued to obtain its UEFA license without objection and has participated in UEFA competitions. To facilitate the verification of information, we reproduce below the complete original text of the UEFA statement: “UEFA can confirm that it has received from Real Madrid CF a substantial amount of documents related to the ongoing investigation into FC Barcelona in the case involving José María Enríquez Negreira, the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees of the Royal Spanish Football Federation (the so-called "Negreira" case). UEFA's ethical and disciplinary inspectors have also received these latest documents, which they will evaluate as part of their ongoing review. FC Barcelona reiterates its full cooperation with the competent authorities and calls for rigor and accuracy in reporting this procedure.” (translated)
In response to the reports published regarding the alleged reactivation of the UEFA procedure in the Negreira case, FC Barcelona wishes to provide the following clarifications: UEFA has opened no new procedure against FC Barcelona. The procedure was initiated in 2023, with the appointment of two investigators who have since taken the action they deemed appropriate. The Club has always responded to all their requests. These procedures have not been reopened because they have never been closed. UEFA's statement confirms the receipt of the documentation submitted by Real Madrid and indicates that the investigators will evaluate it as part of the existing inquiry. The same text expressly refers, twice, to an investigation and review that are "ongoing." It does not announce the opening, reopening, or reactivation of any procedure, nor any evaluation of the substance or value of the documentation provided. It encourages the investigators to determine what action, if any, they deem appropriate regarding this documentation. To date, they have not made new requests to FC Barcelona and have not forwarded Real Madrid's complaint to the club. If they do, the Club will respond accordingly, as it has done thus far. In accordance with the applicable legislation governing this matter, this procedure is subject to the outcome of the criminal case currently being heard in Spain and will continue to be so. Since the beginning of the investigation, FC Barcelona has continued to obtain its UEFA license without objection and has participated in UEFA competitions. To facilitate the verification of information, we reproduce below the complete original text of UEFA's statement: "UEFA can confirm that it has received from Real Madrid CF a substantial amount of documents related to the ongoing investigation into FC Barcelona in the case involving José María Enríquez Negreira, the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees of the Royal Spanish Football Federation (the so-called 'Negreira' case). UEFA's ethical and disciplinary inspectors have also received these documents which they will evaluate as part of their ongoing review." FC Barcelona reiterates its full cooperation with the competent authorities and calls for rigor and accuracy in the reporting of this procedure. (translated)
A young man runs to the police. "Mr. Officer, I know something, I know something. I can even prove it. Here, take my phone. Everything is stored here." It turns out he can't prove anything, but half a dozen of his friends (and female friends) and he now have problems with youth pornography, animal pornography, and depictions of violence. I can assure you, out of 100 youths, at least 80 have a criminal problem as soon as a public prosecutor takes a closer look at the content. The rate for all others, up to boomers, is probably only slightly better. Source: More than 50% from WhatsApp groups. As soon as the public prosecutor's office continues the investigation, the whole school will have investigative procedures hanging over them, along with the entire soccer club and the volunteer fire department... Whoever voluntarily hands over their phone to the state has, in the truest sense of the word, lost control over their life. The only downside is that all their contacts are also implicated in the process. (translated)
The judges in Spain searched for 3 years Found nothing Good luck to UEFA It will end with no sanctions Innocent 🥊 (translated)
UNBEARABLE! In Paris, a policewoman was attacked in the street, in broad daylight, in front of everyone. It's no longer a breach of public order. It's an attack against the authority of the State. The perpetrators must be found, judged, and heavily sentenced. When authority withdraws, the... (translated)
The negative perception of Jean-Luc Mélenchon is not diminishing in public opinion. While he is seen as more unifying (36%), close to people (28%), and capable of leading France (22%) than in March, the French still view the rebellious leader as just as aggressive (78%) and dangerous (70%). (translated)
At the trial of Rémy Daillet, judged for having organized an uprising with a far-right group and for his role in the kidnapping of little Mia, he defied the court by presenting himself as an expert in human management. (translated)

"The investigation was well done. At some point, one must whistle the end of recess." A hypothesis deemed "completely extravagant" by the historian Michel Pierre, author of "L'Impossible innocence" (Tallandier, 2019), who had access to the "incriminating" case file of the Seznec affair. (translated)
Knocking a policewoman down with a sweep from behind, then hitting her on the ground in a pack: it makes me want to vomit 🤮! I hope that the perpetrators will be quickly apprehended, judged, and incarcerated. So, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a word for this woman hit on the ground? Moreover, a policewoman 🇫🇷. (translated)
🚨💣 BREAKING : ▪️#ManCity will attempt to demonstrate its innocence by asserting that certain sponsorship contracts were partly financed by the Abu Dhabi government, rather than by the Abu Dhabi United Group, the private company owned by Sheikh Mansour. According to this argument, these agreements would therefore not constitute a violation of the rules. ▪️ The "irrefutable evidence" put forth by #ManCity throughout the case with the Premier League consists of bank statements from the government and testimonies presented at the hearing. They show that money was transferred from government accounts to sponsors, who then used these funds to pay @ManCity. ▪️The independent commission determined that Sheikh Mansour was unaware of what it describes as a series of "fictitious" agreements. On appeal, #ManCity is expected to argue that it is implausible for Mansour to have been unaware that nearly £830 million of his own money was being used in this manner. The club is also likely to contest the use of the term "fictitious," arguing that it is not merely a word indicating something suspicious, but a legal term that has been improperly applied in this case. ▪️#ManCity's lawyers are also expected to challenge the time taken by the independent commission to render its verdict. They will argue that, in this type of case, decisions should normally be made within three months after the hearing ends, so that judges maintain an accurate memory of the examined elements. According to City, this delay would render the decision “legally unsafe.” The club will also emphasize that it presented 24 witnesses at the hearing, while the Premier League provided no witnesses confirming the existence of the alleged conspiracy. [via @MikeKeegan_DM] (translated)
The European Commission has decided to sue Belgium before the Court of Justice of the European Union for recognizing arbitration awards deemed illegal, compromising European regulations on state aid. (translated)

The EU Commission has launched the next round of the DiscoverEU program, in which up to 41,000 18-year-old Europeans can receive free train tickets and additional benefits to travel across Europe for up to 30 days and gain cultural experiences. (translated)

The AfD and the CDU adopted a measure prohibiting the installation of commemorative plaques in memory of the victims of Nazism in Heidenau, deemed inappropriate by the elected officials. (translated)

ALERT - The Prime Minister FEARS THAT THE HIGH SCHOOL CRISIS MAY PERSIST for SEVERAL MONTHS, possibly until the presidential election. His advisors, including several former prefects, are observing an unprecedented "CONVERGENCE OF STRUGGLES" between young people from the suburbs and the city center, coming from very different social backgrounds. (Loïc Besson - BFMTV) (translated)