Search

emitrix wrote that she would remember the friendships that did not take a political stance in light of the current situation. She said that, in her opinion, there was no justification for the lack of positioning, especially regarding the safety of various minorities, including her own. Although she claimed not to like politics, she assessed that the moment required mobilization. #Amizade #Política #Movimento (translated)

Planet Football reported that the court had denied, on the 5th, Vasco's request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors for the South American tournament, in a match scheduled for October 20. According to the profile, the judge considered technical arguments from the Fla-Flu Consortium that the pitch could not withstand the sequence of games, and there was still room for appeal. The profile added that Vasco had until that day to inform Conmebol if they would play outside the municipality of Rio and until Saturday (10) to indicate another stadium in the city. It also stated that São Januário did not meet the minimum requirement of 30,000 seats. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

Political Analysis stated that Kássio Nunes, president of the TSE appointed by Bolsonaro, censored artistic performances at Lula's events. It also said that previous broadcasts would be removed from the president's networks and claimed that the measure had no legal justification and benefited Flávio Bolsonaro. #Censura #LiberdadeDeExpressão #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Jones Manoel 5050 stated that Meta once again restricted his account and violated a court injunction. According to him, for months he reported actions by Meta/Facebook, particularly on Instagram, which have reduced the reach of his account, hindered live broadcasts and advertisements, and removed posts about electoral activities, without apparent reason or plausible justification. Manoel said that the candidacy was legally challenging what he described as a deliberate attempt to limit his political reach. He cited case number 0033602-61.2026.8.17.821 and stated that a court decision ordered the end of the restrictions, under penalty of a fine. He added that his legal team would act against Meta. The publication identified the PSOL/REDE Federation as responsible for the electoral propaganda, with CNPJ 68.571.443/0001-76. #Meta #Eleições2024 #LiberdadeDeExpressão (translated)

André Guedes criticized the use of billions from the electoral fund, which, according to him, was justified by the pursuit of a balanced election. He stated that, in the end, the Judiciary and the broadcasters concentrated the dispute on only two candidates and questioned the purpose of the funds. #Eleições2024 #JustiçaEleitoral #Democracia (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Darling throws away every chance she has to provide a good justification and eliminate an opponent. Her move to ambush Jottapê was perfect. She missed the opportunity in the dynamics and today again. Maíra was one of the few who stood by her in critical moments. #AFazenda #AFazenda #AFazenda #RealityShow #DramasDaFazenda (translated)

I received information that journalists and employees of the management of TV Globo RJ and SP are concerned about the post-election and the reputation of the channel's journalism if Renan is not invited to the debate. Behind the scenes, the conversation is that Renan will end the election in 3rd place and far ahead of the other invited candidates for the debate (Cury and Caiado) and now Zema by Nunes' decision. There is no plausible justification for this. The fear is that Globo will repeat 1989 and that the Renan episode will be another chapter of Globo's sabotage in Brazilian elections. #TVGlobo #Eleições2023 #Jornalismo (translated)

🚨 Agora! Deputada cobra explicações após veto de Flamengo e Fluminense ao Vasco pelo Maracanã. A deputada estadual Dani Monteiro (PSOL) enviou hoje um ofício ao Consórcio Maracanã pedindo a revisão do "não" ao Vasco para mandar no estádio a semifinal da Sul-Americana contra o Boca Juniors. A Secretaria de Estado da Casa Civil também foi oficiada. "O Maracanã é público e não pode ser administrado como se tivesse dono. É preciso explicar por que o gramado serve para NFL e grandes eventos, mas, quando chega a vez do Vasco, surgem todos os tipos de justificativa para impedir o uso", afirmou. "Não estamos falando sobre qualquer clube de várzea, mas de um dos maiores do Brasil, jogando 3 dos maiores campeonatos do continente. O Vasco tem uma história que se confunde com a democratização do futebol e com a luta contra o racismo. A gigante torcida vascaína também é parte da história do Maracanã; não à toa existe a estátua do Bellini ali. Se existe um critério, que ele seja público e aplicado a todos, inclusive aos times do Consórcio. O que não pode existir é uma regra para cada clube", completou Dani Monteiro. 🗞️ @pedrosa 📸 Divulgação/Alerj #Maracanã #Futebol #Vasco

⚠️ Deputada a estadual Dani Monteiro cobra explicações ao Consórcio e à Casa Civil após mais um veto ao Vasco no Maracanã A deputada estadual Dani Monteiro (PSOL) encaminhou nesta terça-feira (29) um ofício ao Consórcio Maracanã cobrando a revisão da decisão que negou ao Vasco o direito de disputar no estádio a partida contra o Boca Juniors, pela semifinal da Copa Sul-Americana. A Secretaria de Estado de Casa Civil também foi oficiada pelo mandato parlamentar, segundo apurou o #CanaldoPedrosa. Entre as justificativas apresentadas pelo consórcio estão as condições do gramado, o calendário de jogos e até os efeitos do fenômeno El Niño. No ofício, Dani Monteiro questionou os argumentos. “O Maracanã é um equipamento público e não pode ser administrado como se tivesse dono, estamos falando de uma concessão. É preciso explicar por que o gramado serve para uma partida da NFL, para grandes eventos e para diferentes programações, mas, quando chega a vez do Vasco enquanto mandante, surgem todos os tipos de justificativa para impedir o uso do estádio”, afirmou. Ainda no documento, a deputada solicita os estudos técnicos, laudos agronômicos e pareceres que fundamentaram a negativa, além dos critérios utilizados pelo Consórcio Maracanã para autorizar ou recusar partidas e eventos. O ofício também cobra tratamento isonômico entre os clubes que utilizam ou solicitam o estádio. “Não estamos falando sobre qualquer clube de várzea, mas de um dos maiores do Brasil, jogando três dos maiores campeonatos do continente. O Vasco tem uma história que se confunde com a democratização do futebol e com a luta contra o racismo. A gigante torcida vascaína também é parte da história do Maracanã; não à toa existe a estátua do Bellini ali. Se existe um critério técnico, que ele seja público, transparente e aplicado igualmente a todos, inclusive aos times do consórcio. O que não pode existir é uma regra para cada clube”, completou Dani Monteiro. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol

🚨 VOO DE MORAES NO AVIÃO DA FAB: PROTOCOLEI NESSE MOMENTO UMA REPRESENTAÇÃO NO TCU. Está circulando um vídeo que seria de Moraes deixando São Paulo num avião da FAB, depois do casamento do filho. Caso confirmado o Brasil merece explicações. Avião da FAB é pago com o seu imposto. E a lista de quem voa com ministros do Supremo está em sigilo por cinco anos. Pedi ao TCU: esse voo aconteceu? Quem autorizou? Com qual justificativa? Mandar pra PGR? O PGR estava no casamento. QUANTO CUSTOU? QUEM ESTAVA A BORDO? #FAB #Transparência #Justiça

Moraes pegou carona no avião da FAB? Alexandre de Moraes esteve em São Paulo para o casamento do próprio filho, realizado sob forte esquema de segurança, com policiamento, barricadas e interdição de vias. Agora, imagens mostram o ministro deixando a cidade em uma aeronave da Força Aérea Brasileira. No caso do Judiciário, a regra autoriza diretamente o presidente do STF a requisitar esse transporte, não qualquer ministro da Corte. Moraes não ocupa a presidência do Supremo. Outras autoridades precisam de autorização específica e o voo deve estar relacionado a emergência médica, segurança ou viagem a serviço. Por isso, o brasileiro merece saber: quem autorizou esse voo e qual foi a justificativa apresentada por Moraes logo após um evento familiar? Escreva nos comentários 👇 #Moraes #ForçaAéreaBrasileira #Justiça

🚨 O consórcio responsável pelo Maracanã recusou o pedido do Vasco para mandar o jogo contra o Boca Juniors no estádio. A justificativa foi a sequência de partidas e o desgaste do gramado. O Vasco ainda avalia recorrer à Justiça para tentar levar o confronto ao Maracanã. Internamente, porém, existe desgaste com a situação. Pedrinho entende que o clube deveria ter o direito de utilizar o estádio e já manifestou a pessoas próximas que não vê sentido em judicializar uma questão que, segundo ele, já possui um acordo firmado. Diante disso, parte da diretoria defende concentrar os esforços na tentativa de viabilizar São Januário, atualmente vetado pela Conmebol por questões relacionadas à capacidade. 📰 @brunomurito 📷 Daniel Ramalho #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaLibertadores

Não pode um ministro do STF interferir no processo eleitoral dessa maneira. André Mendonça, além da seletividade com a qual vem tratando o caso Master de Bolsonaro e Vorcaro, decidiu tirar do ar mais de mil conteúdos hoje sobre Nossa Senhora Aparecida - e aí vai uma publicação minha, inclusive. O meu vídeo não tinha qualquer ofensa, fake news, não cometia nenhum tipo de crime. Por que então foi retirado do ar, assim como tantos outros conteúdos, arbitrariamente e sem nenhuma justificativa? Para favorecer um candidato? É grave todo o cerceamento que acontece a uma semana das eleições. E é também para enfrentar esses poderes das big techs que eu quero ser eleito deputado federal. Por isso, no dia 4 vamos de 1331! #Eleições2022 #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Justiça

🚨 URGENTE! ESPALHEM ESSA MENSAGEM! A conta de anúncios da campanha do presidente Lula no Facebook foi suspensa pela Meta há apenas 10 dias do primeiro turno. É gravíssima essa decisão da Meta, tomada sem nenhuma justificativa clara, porque interfere nas eleições prejudicando um dos candidatos. Sabemos das ligações das big techs com a extrema direita e em especial com o governo de Donald Trump, que também está intervindo no processo eleitoral. E grave! Ajude a espalhar essa denúncia! #Eleições2022 #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Censura