Search

Bartosz Malewski wrote that the detention protocol and charges were presented to Piotr 30 hours after his arrest. He assessed that this was the first properly conducted action in the proceedings and added that during this time Piotr was removed from handcuffs for the first time. According to Malewski, Piotr was charged with forcing police officers to refrain from taking action and violating the bodily integrity of the police officers. In the case of one of the officers, the charge was said to include actions threatening loss of life or serious bodily harm. Malewski cited the provisions: Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1a of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code, as well as Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1 of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code. He stated that Piotr did not admit to the alleged acts and refused to provide explanations, but he submitted an extensive statement about the course of events from his own perspective and about the period of detention so far. Malewski also informed that a request had been submitted, among other things, for an examination of Piotr's health status. #policja #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Jacek Ozdoba stated that the recordings published by the police revealed, in his opinion, numerous irregularities during Piotr's arrest. He questioned why the officers did not provide a specific reason for requesting documents and emphasized the knife issue, although — according to the account presented — Piotr did not use it. Ozdoba demanded clarification on whether the policewoman sustained injuries and what evidence exists for that. He assessed that the recordings undermined information regarding her health status. He also pointed to allegations concerning actions taken after the arrest, which — as he wrote — could indicate the possibility of a crime being committed. He also questioned the conditioning of contact with a lawyer on providing personal data, reminding about the arrested person's right to contact a defender as stipulated in Article 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He asked whether he was allowed to notify a close person, whether the measures applied were necessary and proportional, and whether he was provided with adequate medical assistance. According to a statement by Piotr W., which Ozdoba referred to, comprehensive medical examinations were not conducted. Ozdoba also raised concerns regarding the legal grounds for the arrest and pointed to the possibility of judicial review based on Article 246 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his opinion, the actions of the officers should also be assessed in light of Article 231 of the Penal Code. He wrote that a uniform does not exempt one from responsibility, and an arrest does not strip a person of their rights. He added that the course of actions and communication by the police, which he assessed presented many facts in a way inconsistent with reality, raised justified concerns of provocation. #Polska #Policja #Prawo (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska reported that together with lawyer Magdalena Przadka and lawyer Bartosz Malewski, she met with Piotr, who — as she wrote — was brutally arrested the day before in connection with the events surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal. She added that Piotr presented a statement for the media. https://t.co/n2eX1Oyclt #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PrawaCzłowieka #Sprawiedliwość (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that after more than 24 hours, he and his team gained access to the detained Piotr. According to him, during the conversation, seven police officers were present in the room, who remained there the entire time, which Malewski considered a violation of the right to defense. He wrote that Piotr had his hands tied behind his back the entire time, and the police justified this measure with an alleged threat to safety, without explaining what it was. The handcuffs were moved to the front for a few seconds so that Piotr could sign a power of attorney for defense and a statement. Malewski reported that Piotr's health condition was poor, he could barely sit, and he felt threatened. He added that the detainee did not know the reasons for his detention and no charges were presented to him. Piotr wanted his defenders to be present at all activities. #Prawo #Obrona #Policja (translated)

Małgorzata Gałka wrote that the police released a recording involving Mr. Piotr as evidence that the man refused contact with a lawyer. According to her, in the recording he set a condition that he be provided with the lawyer's details, but he did not receive information on where it came from. Gałka suggested that she might have been planted. She added that the police officers attempted to persuade the man to sign documents without explaining what they were about and emphasized that the conversation was being recorded. Gałka assessed that describing this action as an attempt to protect themselves from liability would be too lenient. She also recalled that Bartosz Malewski spoke the day before in wPolsce.pl about the course of the situation and how often the police in similar cases cite the argument that someone did not want a lawyer. #policja #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Chrzanik conveyed a statement from Piotr, who had been detained the day before. Piotr had written that he had no contact with his wife or access to his defenders, he had not received a copy of the detention protocol, and no tests were performed on him at the hospital. He also claimed that he had been handcuffed the entire time and that only part of the money he had on him was included in the inventory of seized items. Chrzanik criticized the police's actions and wrote that if they do not prove otherwise, it will be a scandal. #Polska #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Eight judges of the Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the Sejm of the same term issued a statement in which they emphasized that their adjudication is being blocked by judge Bogdan Święczkowski and that the president does not have the authority to appoint judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, and that their oath is in accordance with the applicable regulations. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #sędziowie #konstytucja (translated)

Zbigniew Konwiński wrote that eight judges of the Constitutional Tribunal issued a statement in which they stated that the Constitution does not grant the president the authority to appoint judges of the Constitutional Tribunal. According to Konwiński's report, they also pointed out that the oath is taken by the judge, not accepted by the president, and that it was sworn before the president in accordance with statutory conditions. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #Konstytucja (translated)

Jacek Zarzecki wrote that the events at the Łączna Zoo went according to his earlier predictions. He accused the organizations involved in the action of withdrawing from responsibility after it started, pointing out in statements, among others, the prosecutor's office, police, and inspection. He mentioned MONDO CANE among them. According to Zarzecki, it was the organizations that filed notifications, provided materials not verified by the prosecutor's office, entered the premises, and caught and transported animals. He also criticized private associations and foundations, claiming they have powers that should belong exclusively to the state and that accountability for their actions is difficult. Zarzecki called for organizations to be stripped of the right to intervene in the seizure of animals. He wrote that work was ongoing in the Sejm on amending the Animal Protection Act, and that the seizure of animals should be handled by services that document their actions and are responsible for decisions. He stated that the action in Łączna should be the last of its kind. #OchronaZwierząt #Polska #Sejm (translated)

Eight judges of the Constitutional Tribunal issued a statement in which they emphasize that the president has no authority to block their swearing-in or the selection of judges, accusing Bogdan Święczkowski of unconstitutional actions. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Sędziowie #Prezydent (translated)

The judges of the Constitutional Tribunal issued a statement in which they emphasized that the President does not have the authority to select judges of the Tribunal, and the process of their swearing-in, even if it took place without his presence, is in accordance with the law and should lead to their immediate admission to adjudication. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #Polska (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized Rafał Jankowski and the board of the NSZZ Policjantów after Jankowski stated that police officers "do not stand on the side of the government." He claimed that such a position undermines loyalty to constitutional organs of the state and could lead to anarchy. He accused Jankowski of having political ties to PiS and argued that his statement encourages police officers not to fulfill their duties. Mazguła referred to Article 27, point 1 of the Police Act of April 6, 1990, and cited the oath taken by police officers. He argued that police officers should serve Poland and its constitutional bodies, including the democratically elected government and the Minister of the Interior and Administration. He also accused the NSZZ board and Jankowski of focusing on pay and benefits. The author wrote that Jankowski did not respond to what he described as cases of death following police interventions, the use of violence against women and peaceful demonstrators, the detention of a female MP, the shooting of a “Solidarity” journalist, as well as repression and falsification of evidence against democratic opposition activists. These were Mazguła's accusations against Jankowski. Mazguła urged policewomen and policemen to serve Poland, not politics, and to use force against those breaking the law. He added that since Jankowski informed institutions of his position, he also conveyed his opinion to them. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #WojskoPolskie #Policja #Praworządność #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Petenucci published an apology regarding the post from October 14, 2026, about Bartłomiej Babuśka. He admitted that he misled the public opinion by claiming that the honorary consul of Ukraine owned a property not reported in his asset declaration, which was registered under his son’s name, in Marbella. As he wrote, after checking the GPS coordinates, he determined that the property was located in the nearby Fuengirola. He apologized to Babuśka for violating his personal rights by incorrectly attributing the property to Marbella. The post was signed by Konstanty Migacz. #przeprosiny #oświadczenie #media (translated)

Jan Molski cited the statement of the president, who deemed the swearing-in of minister Berek as non-existent, arguing that Berek did not take the oath before the President of the Republic of Poland. Molski described the statement as very strong and considered it to be justified. https://t.co/gaCN7OYgky #Polska #Polityka #Prezydent (translated)

Deputy Marshal of the Sejm Marcin Horała assessed that the actions taken that day in the Sejm in connection with the Constitutional Tribunal were illegal. He referred to Article 4 of the Law on the Status of Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, which — as he wrote — requires an oath to be taken before the President of the Republic of Poland. He stated that the event in the Marshal of the Sejm's office did not meet this requirement. Horała noted that Maciej Berek was neither appointed as a judge of the Tribunal nor effectively elected to this position, as the formal prerequisite from Article 3 of the law was not fulfilled. He wrote that he does not recognize or legitimize these events and assessed that instead of remedying the Tribunal, they deepen chaos and lawlessness. He pointed to a constitutional reset proposed by the Rozwój Plus environment as the only possibility for restoring the normal functioning of the Tribunal. He appealed to the ruling coalition to refrain from further actions which — in his opinion — lead to lawlessness and chaos. He added that the President can count on his environment in all actions aimed at securing constitutional order. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #Polityka (translated)