Search

The profile Só Quem é LULA 2026 stated that ICL Notícias had reported that Daniel Vorcaro, the owner of Banco Master, paid R$ 10 million per year to CNN and demanded to approve the questions before interviews. According to the profile, executives from the channel frequently asked for money, and an executive from Master allegedly described CNN as a recurring source of money requests. The author also accused CNN of giving space to Roberta Luchsinger to make accusations against Lula and Lulinha without presenting evidence, documents, or facts. It was stated that Vorcaro financed the channel and that Flávio traveled by private jet with him and negotiated millions with Banco Master. In the profile's assessment, Roberta's interview was not journalism but a service rendered; it also claimed that CNN charged instead of interviewing. The publication also mentioned the hashtags #DebateNaBand, #UmaSemanaParaOTetra, #AtoPelaDemocracia, #ElesPoderiamEstarVivos, and #VacinaSalvaVidaBolsonaroTira, in addition to Haddad, Roberta Luchsinger, Lulinha, Ministry of Prosperity, Pablo Marçal, Marcelo Aguiar, Collor, Nexus, PoderData, Bolsonaro, and Globo, in a series of references to topics and people that, according to the author, appeared in the debate or trends. In the end, it requested that the content be shared before it disappeared. #CNN #Imprensa #Jornalismo (translated)

Dawisson Belém Lopes wrote that research results could appear as 50/50 on PoderData or 52/48 on Nexus, but they would be statistically equivalent. Therefore, he stated, it was important to observe the trend: Nexus would be closer to the average, while PoderData would be going in the opposite direction. #Pesquisas #Estatística #Tendências (translated)

She cited research from BTG/Nexus, AtlasIntel, and PoderData/AYA about the second round. According to the figures she presented, Flávio Bolsonaro had 50.3% of the valid votes against 49.7% for Lula in the first; 51.1% against 48.9% in the second; and 52% against 48% in the third. She noted that Flávio was leading in all three, but said that nothing was guaranteed and argued that supporters should maintain their mobilization to remove Lula from political life. #Eleições2024 #FlávioBolsonaro #Lula (translated)

Political Analysis stated that three polls released that day showed a tie between Flávio and Lula in Nexus, at 50% for each, with variations of -2 and +2, respectively. In Atlas, Flávio had 51% (-2) and Lula, 49% (+2); in PoderData, Flávio appeared with 52% (+2) and Lula with 48% (-2). According to the publication, the average was 51% for Flávio and 49% for Lula, before the Band debate and the adjustment of the Bolsa Família, which began that day. #Pesquisas #Eleições2024 #Brasil (translated)

Pedro Albuquerque F stated that even the most favorable polls for Lula were unable to help him. According to him, Nexus showed a tie at 50% to 50% and had underestimated Flávio by 8 points in the first round; Atlas indicated Flávio with 51% and Lula with 49%, after underestimating him by 5 points; and PoderData showed Flávio with 52% and Lula with 48%, after underestimating him by 4 points. Albuquerque F added that, despite the historical underestimation of Flávio, all still indicated a tie or advantage for him. #Eleições2023 #PolíticaBrasileira #Lula (translated)

Kim D. Paim wrote that the PowerData survey had shown a tie between Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) and Lula (PT) the previous week. According to the numbers he quoted for valid votes, Flávio had 52%, an increase of 2 points, and Lula had 48%, a decrease of 2 points. Paim predicted that Quaest and Datafolha would make a "correction" on Friday and Saturday, raising Flávio's votes and lowering Lula's. #Eleições2024 #Política #Votação (translated)

BRPolls reported that, according to a PoderData survey, Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) had 52% of valid votes in the second round, an increase of 2 points, while Lula (PT) had 48%, a decrease of 2 points. The publication stated that the survey interviewed 3,000 voters between October 16 and 18, had a margin of error of ±1.8 percentage points, and was registered with the TSE under code BR-02586/2026. #Eleições2026 #Votação #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Biazita Gomes said she found the PoderData survey released that day strange, since, according to her, the broader field collection would then begin. She stated that the survey had been conducted quickly, at the last minute, and with a specific audience, and that it had been heavily weighted in favor of Flávio. #pesquisa #poderdata #Flávio (translated)

Vitor de Lucca stated that PoderData and Nexus conducted surveys during the same period, but said that the lack of disclosure of decimal numbers and total votes by PoderData prevented a complete comparison. He classified Nexus's survey as of higher quality and considered the decision of the institute to disclose the decimals when the election became tighter to be correct. De Lucca also wrote that, in the last week, the priority should be to try to convert votes and share excerpts of the debate on social media, instead of worrying about surveys. He recommended paying special attention to Facebook, which he described as a bubble of the right, and said that the left was forgetting that many people still use the platform. #Eleições2023 #PesquisaEleitoral #VotoConsciente (translated)

Biazita Gomes stated that a PoderData survey circulating that indicated a drop for Lula did not exist. According to her, the next collection by the institute would take place from the 19th to the 21st, with a release scheduled for the 22nd, and the survey in circulation was false. #PoderData #FakeNews #Lula (translated)

Polls Elections released a national survey from PoderData/AYA for the second round of the presidential race, considering valid votes. According to the publication, Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) had 52%, compared to 48% for Lula (PT). In comparison to the previous survey, Bolsonaro had risen by two percentage points and Lula had dropped by two, a four-point change in the difference between the candidates. The publication emphasized that the survey reflected the moment and did not predict the electoral outcome. According to the technical sheet released, the survey was conducted from October 16 to 18, 2026, with 3,000 interviews nationwide. The margin of error was 1.8 percentage points, and the confidence level was 95%. The registration with the TSE was BR-02586/2026. #Eleições2026 #PoderData #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Vitor de Lucca released a national survey from PODERDATA/AYA for the Presidency, with Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) at 52% of valid votes in the second round, an increase of 2 points, and Lula (PT) at 48%, a decrease of 2 points. The publication indicated the period as "October 13-15 > 16 to 18" and reported that 3,000 interviews were conducted, with a margin of error of 1.8%, a confidence level of 95%, and registration with the TSE BR-02586/2026. (translated)

Election polls stated that a new round of electoral surveys was scheduled for the following day, but the surveys were not expected to fully capture the voters' reaction to the Band debate between Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro, held that day. Nexus, AtlasIntel, PoderData, and Futura were among the anticipated polls. (translated)

Biazita Gomes mentioned PoderData from the previous day and stated that, in her assessment, those who said a turnaround was impossible aimed to demobilize the militancy. She added that that week would be decisive. https://t.co/xlVjWvfLYp #Política #Mobilização #Eleição (translated)

Janoninho released a PoderData/AYA poll conducted from October 13 to 15, 2026, and asked followers to share it. According to the numbers he published, Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) and Lula (PT) were tied with 50% of valid votes in the second round. In the prompted poll, both had 47% of the total votes, he stated. Janoninho said the difference had dropped from 6 points in the survey conducted from October 5 to 7 to zero. He also reported a margin of error of 1.8 percentage points and 3,000 interviews. #Eleições2026 #Brasil #Democracia (translated)