Search

The author stated that Daniela Lima had first-hand released a UN report questioning Meta for interference in the Brazilian election. According to him, experts from the Human Rights Council demanded that the company protect political expression and take effective measures during the electoral period after receiving reports of restrictions on the platforms. He said that the issue involved freedom of expression, association, and equality among political positions, and claimed that Meta limited the reach of one side while amplifying the other. He also asserted that the company was not neutral and that the UN had already demanded explanations. The author listed among the topics circulating “#WhoIsMarianaFlavio,” “#7MillionLulaSoldiers,” “JUSTICE FOR ANA CLARA,” Quaest, “CENSORSHIP NEVER AGAIN,” “FLAVIO AND RED COMMAND,” “#FlavioOwnerOfBet,” “#CensorshipNo,” Felipe Nunes, “4 days left,” “FLAVIO IS COLLOR,” “WAKE UP JANONES,” “45% and Lula,” Kassio and Mendonça and rejection. At the end, he asked readers to share the publication and claimed they would try to silence the matter. #LiberdadeDeExpressao #CensuraNuncaMais #Eleições2024 (translated)

The account Só Quem é LULA 2026 claimed that Dani Lima would have exposed the connection between Willer Tomás, described as a friend of Flávio Bolsonaro, and the case of the player Richarlison's island. According to the profile, Tomás managed a fund with Flávio until 2025, had disappeared with a mansion, and was being investigated by the Federal Police for alleged theft against elderly people linked to the INSS. The author also described him as a partner in a betting company and involved with offshore accounts and asset management for well-known individuals. He accused Flávio of trying to hide behind Tomás and included a reference that associated the senator with the Comando Vermelho. The publication urged readers to share the content, claiming they might try to erase the traces. The text also mentioned Lula, Kassio, Mendonça, Ana Clara, Quaest, and Janones, in addition to using references to “45%” and “4 left.” #FlavioDevolveAIlha #Justica #Richarlison (translated)

Only Who is LULA 2026 claimed that Daniela Lima, in the Political Pulse, addressed the TSE's decision to censor Janones' channel and the investigation into Willer Tomás, who was described as a friend and partner of Flávio. According to the author, the Federal Police were investigating Tomás, who allegedly had betting businesses in Rio, partnerships with Loterge, and funds in tax havens; one of these funds would have been managed by him and Flávio until 2025. The profile also stated that ministers André Mendonça and Cássio Nunes Marques discussed the possibility of shutting down WhatsApp channels 48 hours before the election, on the same day that the “Lula Army” was said to have reached 7 million. According to the publication, Nunes Marques said he did not support the proposal, while Mendonça acknowledged that the debate existed. The author also listed hashtags and topics related to Lula, Flávio, censorship, Quaest, Ana Clara, and the Red Command, in addition to mentioning the numbers “45%” and “4 left”. #CensuraNao #JustiçaPorAnaClara #7MilhoesDeSoldadosDoLula (translated)

Sâmia Bomfim stated that the new Quaest poll indicated a tied race between Lula, with 44%, and Flávio Bolsonaro, with 45%, a decline of one point for him. According to her, Flávio's rejection reached 52%, while Lula's had dropped six points in the last week. Bomfim also said that the number of undecided voters had doubled since the previous poll and urged that they be convinced, arguing that each vote gained could be decisive. In the end, she advocated for the election of Lula, number 13. #Lula13 #Eleições2024 #PesquisaQuatest (translated)

NINJA Media reported that a Quaest survey released on Wednesday (21) indicated a six percentage point drop in the rejection of Lula (PT) over one week, from 53% to 47%. According to the publication, Flávio Bolsonaro maintained a rejection rate of 52%, above half of the electorate. https://t.co/6EYZun1gGA #Política #Eleições2024 #Lula (translated)

The NINJA Media stated that a Quaest survey, released four days before the second round, indicated a rejection rate of 52% of voters towards Flávio Bolsonaro. It also reported that the rejection of Lula was 47%, compared to 53% a week earlier. https://t.co/X9tuk6YVuB #Eleições2022 #FlávioBolsonaro #Pesquisa (translated)

Guilherme Cortez stated that many people were already realizing what, according to him, could be the "terror" of a Flávio Bolsonaro government. He said that the rejection of Lula did not justify, in his assessment, the choice of a scenario that he described as a nightmare, and he advocated for convincing more people. #Política #Brasil #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)

Pri wrote that a survey from Gerp indicated Flávio Bolsonaro ahead of Lula in a potential second round, with 53% of valid votes against 47%. In total votes, the percentages would be 50% and 45%, respectively, and the six-point advantage would be statistically supported. Pri also stated that Lula had a rejection rate of 49% and added: “On the 25th it’s 22.” https://t.co/Et6Y1RgYWK #Eleição2022 #FlávioBolsonaro #Lula (translated)

Flavia Ferronato stated that Felca had published a video as if he were out of touch with reality and said that, although she considered it very important, she believed that no one would pay attention to it. She added that he would already be facing rejection from people he had helped, something that, according to her, was abominable. Ferronato also described him as yet another victim of the hypocrisy of the left, which, in her assessment, did not care about anyone's pain. #Nárnia #hipocrisia #rejeição (translated)

Dcmonline reported that the rejection of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) fell in the BTG/Nexus poll released on Monday (19), one week before the elections. According to the publication, the percentage of voters who said they would "definitely not" vote for him decreased from 50.6% on October 13 to 47.8%, a reduction of 2.8 percentage points. The rejection of Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) was 46.8%, compared to 47% in the previous round, added dcmonline. https://t.co/WiyoZdHNiL #Eleições2022 #Lula #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

David Ágape wrote that the Attorney General of the Union, Jorge Messias, used an official profile with a seal and link to the AGU to campaign for Lula. He stated that Messias followed a direction from André Janones and criticized the conduct as subservient to the president. Ágape said that, about six months earlier, the AGU, then led by Messias, had published a guideline stating that public agents could not use the prestige of their position or institutional visibility to promote candidacies nor confuse personal manifestations with official positions. According to him, the official channels of the AGU were also restricted during the election period. The author recalled that Messias had been nominated by Lula to the Supreme Court but was rejected by the Senate. Ágape stated that this was the first rejection of a presidential nominee to the Court since 1894. He also questioned whether a revelation attributed to the outlet A Investigação would have influenced the rejection: according to the cited report, Messias signed an AGU opinion favorable to aspects of late abortion and later reportedly cried and said he signed without reading. In the end, Ágape stated that Messias would be close to leaving the position and suggested he would return to acting as a messenger for his political group. https://t.co/KMq0Oyg2R9 #Política #Brasil #AGU (translated)

Roberto Reis stated that the electoral race was tight and, in his assessment, Lula had been regaining votes among voters from classes D and E, especially among those concerned about losing social benefits. According to him, this group had supported Flávio Bolsonaro in the first round after promises of improvements and prosperity. Reis said that Lula was not gaining votes from Augusto Cury, Ronaldo Caiado, or Renan, but from Flávio. The author claimed that there was an unprecedented fear campaign, with allegations of the political use of CRAS, daycare centers, and educational institutions, in addition to the circulation of false information. According to Reis, voters were being warned that they could lose their pensions, Bolsa Família, BPC, and minimum wage adjustments. Reis said that Flávio had already started to react with an advertisement about public safety, crime, and factions, which also reaffirmed the commitment to maintain and improve social programs. In the author's view, the response should be more incisive, with the participation of new allies. He also advocated for Flávio and Cleitinho to jointly present a national proposal for the IPVA, citing the discussion about the tax in Minas Gerais, where, according to him, Cleitinho won in the first round. Regarding the polls, Reis assessed that Flávio was still leading by about 2 points, possibly reaching 3 in the final stretch, while Lula faced greater rejection and a persistent ceiling. He noted that some polls already indicated a tie but expressed reservations about the sampling considerations, especially regarding the composition of social segments. For Reis, the transfer of votes from the third way had already occurred, and the challenge was to maintain the votes gained in the first round. He asked Rogério Marinho to demand greater participation from the new allies and a more precise direction for communication actions. #Eleições2024 #Lula #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)

Xico Graziano stated that a Datafolha survey indicated a 2 percentage point difference between Flávio and Lula, although, according to him, the institute's methodology tended slightly to the left. Graziano said that Lula had a 46% rejection rate, compared to 44% for Flávio, and that 41% disapproved of the PT government, while 35% supported it. In the author's assessment, the indices indicated that Lula's electoral influence was discredited and that, without an extraordinary event or a serious mistake by Flávio, it would be difficult for Lula to reverse the scenario. #Eleição2024 #PolíticaBrasil #DataFolha (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)