Search

"The logic of the 'war party' begins where war is considered an alternative future for Ukraine. I disagree with this. The ability to defend should serve to preserve the country and its inhabitants. The desire for peace does not require justification." The mayor of Kharkiv, Ihor Terekhov, also supported the end of the war through negotiations. #Ukraina #pokój #wojna (translated)

The author accused Marcin Przydacz of inconsistency in his statements about who decided on Donald Tusk's assumption of the office of Prime Minister. He wrote that after Mateusz Morawiecki's government failed to secure a vote of confidence, the Sejm elected Tusk in a constitutional parliamentary procedure, and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Szymon Hołownia had no power to transfer to him. The author stated that by Przydacz's logic, one could argue that Hołownia also decided on the assumption of office by Karol Nawrocki because he convened the National Assembly and enabled the swearing-in. However, he pointed out that in Nawrocki's case, he saw a constitutional problem related to the validity of the elections, the handling of protests, the determination of the validity of the election, and the swearing-in despite objections. He assessed that Hołownia's decision had constitutional significance in this matter. The author also rejected the accusation that Kosiniak-Kamysz prioritized party interests over state interests, claiming that Przydacz equated the interests of the state with preventing Tusk from coming to power. #Polityka #Konstytucja #Debata (translated)

Ana Karantanska described the behavior of the Islamic community as "sneaky logic" and wrote that with such an approach, laws would not be needed until the problem became big enough. She mentioned Ireland, England, and France and asked what they have today. She added that Slovenia has the right to set the rules of public space and that everyone living there should respect them. https://t.co/idl185AbDE #Slovenija #javniprostor #zakoni (translated)

Jakub Kłyszejko criticized the use of Poland’s players, writing that Kacper Potulski and Michał Skóraś had been left on the bench after strong performances in the opening match, while Oskar Pietuszewski had spent two weeks at his club to play just 15 minutes. He said Karol Świderski did not stand out even in the Ekstraklasa, yet was expected to play a leading role for the national team. Kłyszejko argued that the same players continued to be selected despite disappointing, and said the coach was not helping himself through his comments, inconsistent selections and search for excuses. He added that Poland had again played well only for a brief spell in the first half and could not perform well for more than 45 minutes even against an average European side. Kłyszejko also wrote that Robert Lewandowski had hoped to end his international career at a major tournament and that, starting from the third qualifying pot, securing a place would be very difficult. #BIHPOL #ReprezentacjaPolski #Ekstraklasa #Futbol (translated)

The author wrote that Austria needs a new, European-shaped identity characterized by solidarity, courage, and responsibility. He described neutrality as a cold logic that too often restricts Austria to the role of a spectator. Instead, the country should take on responsibility and defend freedom. https://t.co/tWOSUjhmLP #Österreich #Europa #Solidarität #AT #EU (translated)

Malin Ekman wrote that men, according to her, had begun to adopt less flattering traits traditionally associated with women, especially men in public life. She argued that they moralized to maintain their place in social communities and pointed to Alex Schulman as an example. After Dagens Nyheter recruited him, he had, according to Ekman, repeated left-liberal positions already put forward by colleagues and expressed indignation over issues that fit within that environment. Most recently, he had reacted with disgust to support for Stefan Holm, who, according to Ekman, had attacked Schulman's friend in a bar after the friend had jokingly mentioned on TV eight years earlier about killing Holm and his son. Ekman described the mockery of Holm as typical of a community where people constantly judged who was accepted and who it was safe to mock. She argued that those who supported Holm did not necessarily defend his long-standing grievances or propensity for violence, but rather his right to stand up for himself and his family even when it went against prevailing notions of right and wrong. According to Ekman, they instead despised men like Schulman, whom she described as adaptable and prone to decide who could be ostracized. #mansfrågor #feminism #könsroller (translated)

I don't understand, according to what is known from the media so far, if I understood correctly, and I hope I didn't, it turns out that the Security and Intelligence Agency informed the bodies that should act on some report, whether it was the State Inspectorate or the State Attorney's Office, and somehow the basic idea is that the SOA submits its findings and conclusions to the Government and the President of the Republic. I don't see how the SOA can wash its hands of the claim that it did its job by forwarding some tip to the competent authorities, while at the same time withholding that information from those who should be managing the state. It doesn't make sense. #DalijaOrešković #SOA #politika (translated)

Wojciech Jakóbik wrote that Carlson's interlocutor, by asking him — as he assessed — pertinent questions, caused Carlson to lose his voice in the discussion about Ukraine. Jakóbik called him a Russian propagandist and used an offensive term against him. https://t.co/cWW5bim1K9 #Ukraina #propaganda #dyskusja (translated)

The author of the post compared the government's argument to a situation in which a burglar accuses the homeowner of taking his money by installing a lock. He wrote that the government claimed that lowering excise duty and VAT on fuels caused a budget loss that needed to be compensated. #polityka #gospodarka #prawo #PL (translated)

The author wrote that the more Russia engaged in the logic of a prolonged war, the greater the risk of escalation became, but also the possibility that it would lose the arms race. He added that the conflict could turn into a proxy race between the USA and China, which — as he assessed — made the situation more difficult. The post ended with the statement that the situation was still "far from" something that the author did not specify. #wojna #Rosja #USAChiny #RU #US #CN (translated)

Nico Lange wrote that Vladimir Putin spoke for 3 hours and 20 minutes during a speech and a moderated stage discussion at the Valdai Forum on October 1, 2026. From his statements, Lange derived five central points of a Russian strategy. According to Lange, Putin portrays Russian aggression as a reaction to Western attacks or provocations. In doing so, he justifies the war of aggression against Ukraine, prepares the population for a prolonged confrontation, and presents Russian escalations as responses. At the same time, in Lange’s estimation, Putin wants a European security order in which Russia can co-determine decisions. This includes, according to the author, a weakening of NATO, especially its eastern flank, political division and economic destabilization of the EU, as well as an expansion of Russian influence in Central and Eastern Europe. Lange wrote that behind Putin's demand for Ukrainian neutrality are the exclusion of NATO and EU membership as well as a Western orientation. Putin also aims for permanent territorial control over large parts of Ukraine and political control over the country. His statements that Ukraine cannot exist independently and is controlled from the outside were interpreted by Lange as an attempt to question its independence and justify Russian influence. According to Lange, Putin also presents a possible Russian escalation, even to the use of nuclear weapons, as a necessary defense. This is intended to deter NATO and European states from a consistent defense of the Baltics and the Baltic Sea region. Lange referred to Kaliningrad, which he described as Europe’s most militarized area, and wrote that a NATO defense could hit air defense, missile sites, and military infrastructure there. Putin depicts the Russian economy as stable and resilient according to Lange, while he does not address the human and economic costs of the war. Lange wrote that Putin sees the economy mainly as a geopolitical pressure tool against Europe, a war resource, and an instrument for maintaining power. Overall, according to Lange, Putin wants to create a European order dominated by Russia, where Ukraine is subjugated and Moscow controls spheres of influence. #Putin #Geopolitik #Ukraine (translated)

Nice logic. We take you in because you claim to be fleeing from evil death, that is, we save your life. Then when we point out that you have to adapt to Sweden's norms, you scream racist. My sympathy account for people like you is in the negative. The war is over in Afghanistan. Go home. #Sverige #Integration #PoliticalDebate (translated)

This is really starting to look comical. In the message, Mr. Nawrocki says directly - he signed the law, but he is NOT withdrawing the allegations regarding its unconstitutionality and will refer it to the Constitutional Tribunal for subsequent control 🫣 And just a moment later, the Chancellery produces a graphic: "The signature removes the alibi" and "The Constitutional Tribunal will examine the legal errors of the government." No. The Constitutional Tribunal does not examine some unspecified "legal errors of the government." It examines the compliance of the law with the Constitution 🤷‍♂️ If Nawrocki still believes that there are allegations of unconstitutionality against this law that are serious enough to refer it to the CT, then the signature alone does not magically make all objections disappear, and the government suddenly loses its alibi 🤦‍♂️ And if signing this very law is enough to state that the government already has all the tools and bears full responsibility for fuel prices, it would be appropriate to explain how this relates to simultaneously questioning the constitutionality of this instrument. However, the KPRP does not explain this. 🤷‍♂️ Instead, we get another graphic, another slogan, and another attempt to present the signing in such a way that simultaneously signs the law, still questions it, and shifts all responsibility for its effects onto the government 🫣 More and more graphics. Less and less logic 🤓 Think a little, gentlemen... #konstytucja #prawo #Polska (translated)

Łukasz Gibała with a strong dose of RiGCZ: Unlike the KO candidate, he promises to stand by the residents regarding short-term rentals. He would prefer to completely reverse the logic of the new law and ban converting apartments into hotels, and anyone wishing to open such a business would have to obtain the residents' consent. #najemkrótkoterminowy #mieszkania #polityka (translated)

According to logic, the match against the weakest opponent in this group at home should be the perfect moment for more extensive testing. Unfortunately, however, against Romania, we are to see the old guard in order to somehow save our situation in Division B and also save the job. Fantastic development of the national team. 🥴 #reprezentacja #mecz #piłkanożna (translated)

Sir Ciecióra, The President did not veto either the EU SAFE instrument or the EU Council's decision to provide financing to Poland, so please do not manipulate. He vetoed the Polish act on the Financial Instrument for Increasing Security SAFE – that is, the act that creates a national mechanism for managing these funds at BGK and the rules for their use, control, and audit. This is really not the same as your: "Tusk bypassed the veto and took out a loan" 🤷‍♂️ If you want to raise a constitutional or financial allegation, you should first precisely clarify which act was vetoed and what legal consequences this veto caused. And to do that, you first need to read the law that the President actually vetoed with understanding and check what mechanisms it introduced. Only then can one build a political narrative on it. And now the second part of your entry. You are comparing two completely different legal procedures and from this difference, you are making hypocrisy; I am shocked by your logic in this regard. SAFE is a EU law instrument. Financial assistance for Poland was made available by a decision of the EU Council based on the SAFE regulation, and the financing conditions are then specified in a loan agreement with the Commission. On the other hand, lowering Polish taxes requires a change in Polish law. And the law – according to the Constitution – after being passed by parliament goes to the President 🤷‍♂️ It is not - sometimes you can bypass the President, and other times you need to ask for his consent. These are simply two different legal regimes and two different modes of state action. Turning the constitutional difference of competences into proof of the greatest hypocrisy in history looks impressive for the audience, but legally, not much comes of it 🤷‍♂️ #Polska #UE #Prawo (translated)

Mr. Wójcik, I think you are adding too much to a single court ruling. Firstly – we do not yet know the full written justification. From public reports, it appears that the court at this stage did not notice any fear of tampering and deemed the issuance of a travel ban appropriate. That is not the same as erasing the entire procedural history of Mr. Romanowski. Secondly – you are contrasting the explanation of the case with the position of the prosecutor's office. However, the prosecutor's office is currently conducting proceedings to clarify this matter. The dispute is not about whether to clarify it, but under what conditions the suspect should participate in the proceedings 🤔 And finally – can we really say today without any qualification that there is no fear of hiding, aside from the wanted list, the EAW, the many months spent outside Poland, and the current course of the proceedings? In my opinion, no, of course, the court may conclude that the grounds currently look different. That is the court's role. But that does not yet support your narrative that the court wants to clarify the matter, while the prosecution merely wants to chase. The prosecution is pursuing the suspect precisely so that the proceedings can be conducted and the matter clarified 🤷‍♂️ Do you really not see a problem with the logic here? #prawo #sprawiedliwość #sąd (translated)

One of the most primitive goons @tvn24, a walking show-off mixed with complexes, a mediocrity @rafal_wojda, invited a lawyer expert with the intention of smashing the "neosedzi pisowski," and the expert mercilessly smashed @w_zurek and @PK_GOV_PL, pointing out their actions contrary to the legal interest of the public prosecutor and procedural logic. The expert directly said that the court's decision is exceptionally reasonable and justified, and the iron list in no way prevents the issuing of a verdict, and a harsh one at that. In short, Egon @w_zurek is putting on a circus for #silnirazem and is afraid of the trial, which is why he wants to chase the rabbit and file a complaint to avoid the trial. #polityka #prawo #TVN24 (translated)

111 000 PODPISÓW 15 000 roboczogodzin wolontariatu 20+ punktów zbiórki w 18 dzielnicach Warszawy Bez gotowych struktur. Bez zawodowych działaczy. Bez potężnego finansowania. Bez realnego wsparcia partii politycznych i mediów Każdej organizacji społecznej życzę takiego „fiaska” W ciągu zaledwie 60 dni stworzyliśmy z niczego sprawną organizację miejską, która zdołała zebrać 111 000 podpisów Warszawiaków i Warszawianek. Wznieciliśmy skalę społecznej mobilizacji, której Stolica nie widziała od lat. Nasza akcja była przede wszystkim wyrazem sprzeciwu wobec sposobu zarządzania Warszawą: partyjniactwa, kumoterstwa, niegospodarności oraz traktowania urzędu prezydenta miasta jako trampoliny do najwyższych urzędów w państwie. I widzimy, że już teraz nasza akcja przyniosła w tym zakresie pozytywny efekt. W Prezydenta @trzaskowski_ w ostatnich tygodniach wstąpił zadziwiający, niespotykany przez ostatnie 8 lat zapał do zajmowania się problemami miasta i jego mieszkańców. Należy mieć nadzieję, że wraz z końcem zbiórki ta energia nie wyparuje nagle i nie powróci znany tryb „bywania w Ratuszu raz-dwa razy w tygodniu” Przez ostatnie dwa miesiące byliśmy w całej Warszawie. Także tam, gdzie wielu uważało, że naszego wniosku nikt nie będzie chciał podpisywać -chociażby w Miasteczku Wilanów. A jednak ludzie podpisywali. Wielokrotnie słyszeliśmy przy tym: „Głosowałem na Trzaskowskiego, ale mam już dosyć”. I to jest właśnie jeden z najważniejszych rezultatów naszej akcji. Warszawiacy zobaczyli, że można i należy otwarcie dyskutować o sposobie zarządzania miastem, krytykować jego władze i oczekiwać od nich znacznie więcej. Czasy biernej akceptacji dla standardów rodem z oddziału ratunkowego w Szpitalu Południowym bezpowrotnie minęły. Jestem niezwykle dumny z tego, co zbudowaliśmy. Szczególnie dumny jestem z naszych wolontariuszy, którzy poświęcili swój czas pro publico bono - często angażując się społecznie po raz pierwszy. Jestem pewien, że tego potencjału nie zmarnujemy. 🟨Stołeczna Operacja Referendalna się skończyła. 🟥Stołeczna Organizacja Rozwoju właśnie się zaczyna. Będziemy patrzeć władzom Warszawy na ręce. Będziemy wskazywać problemy. Będziemy proponować rozwiązania. Będziemy zabiegać o interes WSZYSTKICH mieszkańców Warszawy. Tymczasem warszawska opozycja, na czele z Prawem i Sprawiedliwością, pokazała bierność, apatię i - najwyraźniej - zadowolenie z obecnego stanu rzeczy. Kierując się kunktatorską logiką, zdecydowali się zignorować oddolny, obywatelski ruch sprzeciwu. Trudno. Ich czas i tak się skończył. My dopiero się rozkręcamy. Dziękuję wszystkim STU JEDENASTU TYSIĄCOM mieszkańców Warszawy, którzy poparli naszą inicjatywę. Działamy dalej. Dla Was ✌️🇵🇱 #Warszawa #Społeczność #AkcjaObywatelska