Search

I understand that you are not an economist, but after all, you have an entire army of "advisors" at your disposal... Because this is no longer information relayed by Moody. This is your RHETORIC. Just like with the debt. "In four years, the government increases debt by a trillion." The thing is, four years have not yet passed 🤷‍♂️ You are already linking the executed debt with a FUTURE FORECAST and then dividing that amount by the number of residents, announcing that a newborn has "26 thousand zł of debt." How do you come to such absurd conclusions?? I won't say it's not impressive... But public debt is not a personal obligation that is assigned to a child's account. And then there's the Constitutional Tribunal. You sign a law, still consider it unconstitutional, and send it to the Tribunal. The same Tribunal that the ECtHR has found to violate the right to a court set by law in the Xero Flor case, and the Grand Chamber of the CJEU in case C-448/23 stated that it does not meet the requirement of an independent and impartial court due to serious irregularities concerning its composition. And just minutes earlier, you said: "I'm not looking at legal loopholes." The Constitution and the legality of state organs are not "legal loopholes," Mr. Guardian of the Constitution 🤦‍♂️ And in the end, you say that you don't want "constant political war"... After a speech in which words fall: - blackmail, - the government’s ATM, - the government's financial catastrophe, - the prime minister's political plan and unsubstantiated claims that the government deliberately maintains high fuel prices to profit from them. I won't judge intentions. I assess the content. And the content of the official statement by the person holding the highest office in the state should withstand confrontation with documents 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Here - in many key areas - it does not withstand. I will no longer dwell on this speech, as I believe it is a waste of time. I'll just say this. I don't know who prepared this text for you. However, I do know that you read it, you delivered it, and you take responsibility for every word. And you repeated nonsense and manipulations that have long circulated in the statements of people from your Chancellery — which I have already corrected multiple times. The worst part is that many of them don't even take long to verify. You just need to open the documents from your own Chancellery. I really don't envy you. It only pains me your slogan: "First Poland, first Poles." Because Poland and Poles should truly come first - even before political interests, party narratives, and the need for another conflict. You cannot appeal to the good of citizens while simultaneously playing with their trust in the state, providing them from the highest office with half-truths, insinuations, and political assessments cloaked as facts. This is not about whether someone likes this government. It's about accountability for words. Especially from this office 🫣 (translated)

"The strength of this presidency lies not in the pursuit of media chaos, but in keeping promises to the Polish people. President Karol Nawrocki consistently maintains this course and does not allow the government's responsibility to be overshadowed by media theatrics," we read in the post by the Chief of the President's Cabinet, Paweł Szefernaker. (translated)

Tomorrow, Poles should find out how much Donald Tusk's words are worth. I encourage you to go to gas stations early in the morning and see if fuel will really be at 5.19 PLN – because Mr. Prime Minister Donald Tusk promised this during the electoral campaign in 2023. - Spokesperson for the President of Poland @LeskiewiczRafa. (translated)

It is worth recalling Ceferin's words from April 2023: I cannot comment on the Negreira case directly for two reasons: first, because we have an independent disciplinary committee for that, and second, because I have not dealt with this matter in detail. However, I can say that it is one of the most serious things I have seen in football. I have been informed, and the situation is extremely serious. At the level of the Spanish league, the case has obviously expired and cannot have sporting consequences, but as far as UEFA is concerned, nothing has expired. (translated)

Unfortunately, President Karol Nawrocki signed the law implementing part of the EU DSA. What is it about? The new regulations develop a system of "trusted reporting entities," whose reports are prioritized by platforms. The most controversial mechanism – the administrative blocking of content deemed illegal by an official – was transferred by Tusk's government to a separate project. They did not give up on it. The example of Hungary has shown how great a threat administrative censorship over the circulation of content online poses during a campaign. It is even more concerning that an election period is approaching in Poland, and Donald Tusk's officials are just receiving tools to interfere with public debate. The European Union created the DSA, and Donald Tusk's government is adding its own solutions to it – the boundaries of freedom of speech are shifting toward state administration. Here, we expected a firm "no" from the President of the Republic of Poland. And unfortunately, we did not receive that "no." What a shame. (translated)

Jerzy Brzęczek 9/9 victories in the youth team. The best possible example of how to finally put your ego in your pocket, take two steps back to be resurrected as a coach. Impressive, a solid piece of work. Great words of recognition for the U21 results, and rumors about a return to the national team? They will only intensify. (translated)

❗️EXPLANATION In connection with the politicians' spin regarding the prosecutor's opposition to the issuance of the ironclad letter, which allegedly prevented the District Court from issuing such a letter, I present statements from court rulings indicating that this is an ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT understanding of the provision of Article 281 paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 👉🏻As noted by the Court of Appeal in Gdańsk in its ruling of March 29, 2022, case file II AKz 222/22: “The understanding of the provision of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in such a way that the prosecutor's opposition would be binding on the district court would lead to systemic inconsistency and would at the same time be an expression of the prosecutor's privilege over the suspect, while reducing the district court to the role of a subordinate entity to the prosecutor's decision. Such a solution would be extremely ineffective and contradict the requirements of procedural economy, which speaks against involving in a specific proceeding as a procedural body an entity that does not have full powers to resolve the issue at stake in that proceeding. If the legislator intended to grant the prosecutor a decisive voice regarding the issuance of an ironclad letter, considering that they should be equipped with that competence as the body conducting the preparatory proceedings and responsible for its effects, they should have done so explicitly by modifying the provisions on functional competence for issuing an ironclad letter in preparatory proceedings. Since this has not been done, leaving this decision in the hands of the district court, the current regulatory provisions - given their lack of clarity and their systemic inconsistency - should be interpreted on the assumption that primacy should be given to the interpretation taking into account systemic assumptions, including rules resulting from the principles of adversariality and equality of the parties. In summary, the systemic and functional interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure leads to the conclusion that the district court considering the suspect's application for the issuance of an ironclad letter in pre-trial proceedings is not bound by the prosecutor's opposition.” 👉🏻Also, the Court of Appeal in Krakow in the case with case file II AKz 523/22 in the justification of the ruling of February 7, 2023: “Analyzing the linguistic interpretation of the aforementioned provision, it is necessary to refer to the designation of the word opposition, which is 'disagreement, protest' (according to SJP PWN - internet service), 'resisting in any form' (...). Also, in the systemic context of the criminal procedure act, 'opposition' means a lack of consent to a specific decision or procedural action and entails a negatory or cassatory effect. This is also how this institution is perceived by W. Hermeliński and B. Nita-Światłowska, indicating that after the amendment the prosecutor was supposed (allegedly) to have the possibility of 'blocking the court with their statement of disagreement on the issuance of an ironclad letter' (...). Therefore, it cannot be acknowledged that the legislator in the amendment to the procedural law on April 20, 2021, established a separate form of 'opposition' and granted the prosecutor shaping powers, i.e., the ability to bind the court with conditions under which the court would consider the suspect's application, especially in the context of applying and shaping the financial guarantee indicated in Article 283 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is also supported by the purposive and logical interpretation of the mentioned regulation. The institution of opposition contained in Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is of an extraordinary nature and was intended by the legislator to limit the judicial independence of the court. Adopting the concept of the possibility of conditioning the opposition on exonerating conditions would lead to a further limitation of the judicial independence of the court than in the case of a literal reading of the provision. (...) In summary - the prosecutor's opposition indicated in Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has a purely negatory character and cannot be burdened with any reservations. This does not take away from the prosecutor's ability to formulate a specific procedural position regarding the conditions for the issuance of an ironclad letter - nevertheless, the court ruling on the subject of the ironclad letter is not bound by them.” (translated)

The only 3 marriages in my close circle that have 3 or more children received significant support from their parents in raising the kids. Little is said and written about this, but grandparents no longer want to help with their grandchildren. They have fairly high pensions that allow for more than just survival, as it was 30 years ago and back. So they prefer to go on all-in trips or other attractions than to help with their grandchildren. Despite the fact that we have a relatively wealthy society, especially compared to a few decades ago, the lack of support from grandparents is noticeable. It's a matter of dropping off a grandchild for 2-3 hours to take care of something, or for a weekend to catch a breath. A friend, a new father, recently heard from his mother that she can take care of the child for a maximum of half an hour and doesn't agree to more because she has more interesting things to do. And to put it bluntly - in my circle of close friends - such words are not isolated. I won't even mention the fact that young parents often live quite far from their own parents, so even that physical help is complicated. That's why it often ends with one child, maybe two. To be fair - we also stopped at two, mainly for health reasons, and we lacked the courage for adoption, like P. @Agata_Laurka 👏👏 (translated)

Mr. Czarnek, since we are already making this a bill for the government's policy, let's check the entire bill, not just the politically convenient items. Is inflation rising? Yes, but from the fact that fuel prices drive up CPI, it does not automatically follow that the increase in fuel prices is a result of the Polish government's decisions. 🤦‍♂️ That is simply a mistake in your reasoning or a deliberate manipulation of public opinion, because the effect of fuel prices on inflation does not determine the cause of fuel prices themselves. 🤷‍♂️ The Central Statistical Office indeed indicated transport, especially fuel, as a significant factor in price growth. I read that too, but it did not state anywhere: that is Donald Tusk's responsibility. You keep reminding us of Mr. Tusk's words, that he promised 5.19 zł. Yes. In June 2022. However, if statements from several years ago are to be an indefinite guarantee of fuel prices regardless of oil prices, war, sanctions, the dollar exchange rate, and the situation on the world market, then I propose to apply this method consistently. 🤷‍♂️ In 2011, Jarosław Kaczyński said: "The excise tax can simply be lowered. If it is lowered, the price of gasoline will also fall." At that time, the price of Pb95 was around 5.14 zł. Ten years later, already under the PiS government, the same Jarosław Kaczyński explained that the excise tax should not be lowered because it limits the state's revenue. 🤦‍♂️ So I understand that old declarations are valid forever, but only for politicians from the opposing camp? 🙂 Later you again claim that high fuel prices are the government's policy. No, Mr. Czarnek. The government influences taxes, some regulations, and support instruments - and that's all. However, it does not determine the world price of oil, does not control the supply of fuel, the dollar exchange rate, or the geopolitical situation. 🤷‍♂️ And since we are so eager to find politicians responsible for the current tensions in the energy market, it might be worth taking a look at Donald ... but Trump, your idol, and his policy towards Iran. Only then does your narrative become a bit less convenient. You claim that more expensive fuel means more expensive transport, production, and pressure on prices. Yes. That is actually true. But again - describing the effects of expensive fuel does not prove that the cause of expensive fuel is Tusk. Professor, you can really criticize the government; there are plenty of such issues or decisions. But maybe without equating: fuel is getting more expensive -> inflation is rising -> therefore Tusk is to blame. 🤦‍♂️ It is really becoming very irritating. (translated)

What a cry from some, because: I called the hater "a type" and as a result "how is that, it's unacceptable!!" (the fact that he vomited insults at me obviously doesn't matter, because a PUBLIC PERSON MUST HAVE THICK SKIN 😆 Well, dear ones. THEY DO NOT HAVE TO. A public person is not someone who can be publicly insulted and made a target for public insults, abuse, and venting frustration. Words have consequences. Learn this. If you don't learn, sooner or later you will meet someone who will prove it to you. And the second cry, that I dared to mention the hater's family. Well, attention: if someone from their public account, where they have sweet pictures with family, children (!), and a respectable spouse, vomits on other people, sends them disgusting messages, insults, then yes: they involve their family in this matter. They bring shame upon it, create an opinion, and additionally facilitate tracking. That's how it works. Don't cry. Let it reach you that today you can say something to someone, and tomorrow you will have to answer for it. And neither a cowardly lack of face or name nor anything like that protects you from it. Really, there are ways. Of course, I am an absolute advocate for the lack of anonymity on social media, logging in through a mobile citizen or biometrics - I don't know, the solution should be devised by those who know better about it. But if that were the case, everyone would realize how quickly the internet space would be cleansed of rudeness, trolling, and violence. Have a nice day! (translated)

Mama nowej dziewczyny megakota szuka pomocy W swoim piśmie matka wskazuje między innymi, że przed poznaniem Zgorzelskiego jej córka prowadziła normalne życie - chodziła do szkoły, miała znajomych i własne plany na przyszłość. Na początku czerwca kobieta otrzymała telefon od koleżanki Wiktorii, która poinformowała ją, że dziewczyna spotyka się ze znacznie starszym mężczyzną. Początkowo córka zaprzeczała tym informacjom, jednak zdjęcia potwierdziły, że rzeczywiście utrzymuje relację z Megakotem. Wtedy matka postanowiła sprawdzić jego przeszłość i trafiła między innymi na materiał dziennikarski poświęcony jego osobie. Postawiła córce ultimatum - jeśli chce nadal mieszkać w domu rodzinnym, musi zakończyć spotkania z celebrytą. Wkrótce Zgorzelski przyjechał po Wiktorię i pomógł jej spakować oraz zabrać rzeczy z domu. Matka zauważyła później znaczące pogorszenie relacji z córką, zmianę jej kontaktów ze znajomymi oraz wyraźny spadek wagi. Jej zdaniem zmiany te pojawiły się wraz z rozpoczęciem związku. Kobieta zwróciła również uwagę na infantylny charakter nagrań publikowanych w internecie, na których jej córka występuje w stylizacjach przypominających dziecięce ubrania. Szukała pomocy na policji oraz konsultowała sprawę z prawnikami i psychiatrą. Rozmawiała z matką samego Zgorzelskiego. Matka skontaktowała się również z byłą partnerką Megakota, Karoliną. Po rozstaniu ze Zgorzelskim i rozpoczęciu przez niego związku z 19-letnią Wiktorią kobieta przekazała matce dziewczyny nagrania, na których miały znajdować się poniżające wypowiedzi oraz słowa odebrane jako groźby. Karolina z własnej inicjatywy nawiązała także kontakt z Konopem. Poinformowała go, że posiada materiały zawierające groźby i wyzwiska, których autorem miał być Megakot, i zadeklarowała, że udostępni je do weryfikacji. Niespodziewanie jednak wycofała się ze współpracy. Jako powód wskazała wprost, że zawarła ze Zgorzelskim finansowe porozumienie. #pomoc #relacje #bezpieczeństwo

Dziś rząd przyjął ostateczną wersję budżetu na rok 2027. W skrócie - czeka nas potężne zderzenie z górą lodową deficytu. 🚢🧊📈 Przypomnijmy najważniejsze fakty⤵️ 🟥 Deficyt sektora finansów publicznych: Prognozowany na poziomie 7,1% PKB (trzeci rok z rzędu na wysokim poziomie, przekraczający kryteria z Maastricht). 🟥 Obsługa długu publicznego: koszt szacowany na 107 mld zł rocznie. 🟥 Rentowność obligacji: przewidywany wzrost rentowności polskich 10-letnich obligacji skarbowych powyżej 6%. 🟥 Nierealne założenia makroekonomiczne: podważenie prognoz dotyczących inflacji (ze względu na kryzys paliwowy i czynniki geopolityczne), wzrostu gospodarczego oraz dynamiki inwestycji. 🟥 Problemy z dochodami podatkowymi: 🔻Załamanie wpływów z podatku VAT (szacowana możliwa do uszczelnienia luka na 30–40 mld zł). 🔻Luka w podatku akcyzowym szacowana na ponad 10 mld zł. 🔻Brak skutecznego opodatkowania zagranicznych korporacji (CIT). 🟥 Skupmy się się na skutkach tej ruiny Tuska dla portfeli Polaków. 🟥 Pierwszym z nich było obniżenie ratingu przez agencję Moody’s. To co udało się Domańskiemu w sierpniu, kiedy uniknął cięcia ratingu przez agencję Fitch dzięki ogłoszeniu podwyższenia drugiego progu podatkowego połączonego z podwyżkami m. in. CIT i zmianami w ryczałcie, Moody’s uznało za działania dalece niewystarczające, szczególnie w obliczu sceptycyzmu Pałacu Prezydenckiego wobec propozycji rządowych. 🟥 Negatywne konsekwencje rynkowe nie ujawnią się w ciągu miesiąca czy kwartału, lecz w perspektywie 12-18 miesięcy (czyli po wyborach). To jawna gra ministra finansów mająca na celu przedkładanie celów politycznych nad stabilność długoterminową. 🟥 W roku 2027 dług krajowy przekroczy 55% PKB, co w kontekście budżetu na rok 2029 będzie oznaczało szereg bolesnych dostosowań fiskalnych: 🔻zakaz uchwalania budżetu z deficytem, na kolejny rok, 🔻zamrożenie płac w budżetówce, 🔻ograniczenie waloryzacji emerytur i rent, 🔻ograniczenia dla samorządów, 🔻zakaz udzielania nowych poręczeń i gwarancji przez Skarb Państwa. 🟥 Wszystko to uzupełniają rosnące obawy inflacyjne i prognozy podwyżek stóp procentowych przez NBP. Bez wyraźnej korekty cen na stacjach paliw należy spodziewać się istotnego wzrostu inflacji - wrześniowa przebije 4% r/r. W kolejnych miesiącach inflacja może przekroczyć nawet 5% r/r a w całym 2027 będzie wyższa niż 3,5%. 🟥 Ekonomiści Pekao SA spodziewają się w najbliższych kwartałach nawet 3 podwyżek stóp - łącznie o 75 punktów bazowych. Z kolei ekonomiści banku ING wskazują, że kontrakty FRA 12x15 (przewidujące wysokość stóp za 12 miesięcy) wynoszą obecnie niemal 5,20%, co oznacza, iż niewiele dzieli go od wycenienia zacieśniania monetarnego rzędu 150 pb w rok. 🟥 W jednym minister Domański ma rację. Cytując jego słowa „Polska nie ma możliwości zwiększania wydatków publicznych przed przyszłorocznymi wyborami, a polityka fiskalna jest wyzwaniem dla rządu”. To zawoalowana parafraza „pieniędzy nie ma i nie będzie”. A po nich? Choćby potop… #budżet2027 #deficyt #finansepubliczne

❗️Faustyna opublikowała oświadczenie w związku z ostatnimi wydarzeniami: "Ta sytuacja i to co wydarzyło się na live jest dla mnie trudne. Uważam, ze sposób okazywania wsparcia w trakcie trzymania diety powinien wyglądać inaczej. Takie słowa nie powinny paść, niezależnie czy był to live czy nie. Nie popieram takiego zachowania i uważam, że każdy powinien decydować o sobie i własnym ciele. Jednocześnie chciałabym zaznaczyć, że nawet w tak przykrych sytuacjach, które budzą dużo emocji nie powinniśmy odpowiadać hejtem. Pamiętajmy o tym na co dzień i bądźmy w stosunku do siebie po prostu dobrzy. Hejt jest okrutnym zjawiskiem. Ten rozdział dla mnie na ten moment jest zamknięty, natomiast na moją decyzję złożyło się wiele różnych kwestii o których też nie wiecie i które chciałabym żeby pozostały prywatne, pomimo że moja relacja była publiczna. Mam nadzieję że to zrozumiecie. Potrzebuję jeszcze chwili dla siebie i wrócę do Was niedługo z dobrą energią. Dbajcie o siebie i innych. Jeszcze raz dziękuję za wsparcie 🫶". #wsparcie #hejt #dobro