Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Weird Duk wrote that in his opinion, surrogacy should be discussed at talk show tables without harsh accusations of homophobia. He stated that Italy had the strictest legislation in Europe: surrogacy had been banned there since 2004, and the Meloni government had tightened the law at the end of 2024. According to him, Italians who used surrogacy in countries like the US or Canada could be prosecuted upon their return. He cited possible penalties of three months to two years in prison and fines ranging from €600,000 to €1,000,000. Regarding Germany, Duk wrote that all forms of surrogacy were prohibited under the Embryo Protection Act. According to him, the law targeted doctors and intermediaries so that intended parents would not be prosecuted criminally. #draagmoederschap #homofobie #wetgeving (translated)

Weird Duk wrote that the woman, according to him, combined unpleasant, coarse, and stupid traits. He referred to a report stating that Belgians were angry about a miscarriage joke by Soundos and that the average dentist was funnier. https://t.co/BNt6xB6R1k #humor #België #miskraam (translated)

Weird Duk wondered how there would be a reaction if he made similar statements after an election victory of a far-left party. As an example, he wrote that Europe commentator Stefan de Vries had sharply criticized the current form of democracy after the major electoral victory of the AfD in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt on EenVandaag. According to Duk, De Vries had called the AfD a Nazi party, warned about its growth, and argued for a different system, without being able to say what should replace democracy. #democratie #verkiezingen #Europa (translated)

Weird Duk wrote that Keulemans referred to his supporters as entirely homophobic. Duk sarcastically described Keulemans as someone who was not homophobic, islamophobic, genderphobic, climatephobic, or against immigration and foreigners, but was indeed Christian-phobic, and called on him to be ashamed. (translated)

Weird Duk wrote that people who he believes spread disinformation about the revolt in France night after night, such as De Vries on Pauw and De Wit, also advocated for censorship of X, Ongehoord, and other media. He claimed that De Vries even wanted to abolish democracy because, in his view, right-wing populists were becoming too powerful. https://t.co/bQXuwN3wpx #vrijheidvanmeningsuiting #censuur #desinformatie (translated)

Weird Duk announced that he would discuss the background of the uprising in France that evening on Nieuws van de Dag on SBS6 at 6:05 PM, including who the rioters were and who he believed was behind them and profiting from the chaos. He would also pose the question of whether Europe could still be saved. #Frankrijk #Europa #Nieuws (translated)

Weird Duk wrote that he had called Owen shortly before. According to Duk, Owen said that he had regularly been involved in riots in Paris, but that the violence and looting he had seen now surpassed everything. According to Owen, no one could intervene for hours. Duk reported that Owen would be a guest that evening on Pauw and De Wit and that colleague Juul Schepens was in Paris or had been there. #Parijs #rellen #geweld (translated)

Weird Duk wrote in a shared link that it showed, according to him, a bizarre parallel reality that was causing Europe to go under. He pointed to the faces and reactions and said that he could hardly bear to look at them. https://t.co/gbZptVXmla #Europa #actualiteit #politiek (translated)

Weird Duk wrote that he posted a lot about it because he found the situation tragic and believed it was foreseeable. According to him, those in power turned a blind eye and denied and downplayed the situation, while they were, in his view, guilty of nonsensical demonization. #maatschappij #politiek #waarheid (translated)