Flavia Ferronato stated that selling journalistic opinions was unacceptable and criticized someone for making a film to become outraged and deny something before, according to her, being unmasked by evidence. She advocated for a deep reform of the Judiciary and journalism, said that a university education would not correct a lack of character, and proposed the creation of a specific crime for journalists who sold articles. #jornalismo #reforma #ética (translated)
Jones Manoel stated that the judiciary of Minas Gerais accepted a request from Flávio Bolsonaro to investigate federal deputy Ana Elisa for allegedly spreading fake news. He accused the judiciary of acting selectively in the electoral process to favor Bolsonaro's candidacy and compared the case to the transmission channel "Tropa de Flávio," which, according to him, spread lies without facing consequences. Manoel said that the Electoral Justice was investigating a deputy from the PT in Minas Gerais for making criticisms and concluded that state institutions were not neutral. In his assessment, they were acting to lead Flávio Bolsonaro to the government and allow the adoption of a program of radicalization of neoliberalism and the transformation of Brazil into a neocolony. #Justiça #Política #Brasil (translated)
Leandro Ruschel stated that, seven years ago, the Judiciary censored, persecuted, and imprisoned the right while protecting people on the left. According to him, the "regime" only began to denounce partisanship after losing complete control of the Electoral Justice, and considered a judge to be partisan if they were not aligned. #Justiça #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Politica (translated)
Jones Manoel stated that reports circulating indicated that WhatsApp's Meta AI was creating campaign images for Flávio Bolsonaro but refused identical requests related to Lula. He classified the episode as manipulation by Meta and said that the case reinforced the need for digital and data sovereignty. He also stated that the actions of large technology companies represented foreign intervention in the country, with the complicity of the Judiciary. Manoel said that, despite what he called an attack, his group would win the second-round election on the 25th. He asked for votes for number 13 and stated that this would ensure better conditions for the struggle starting in 2027. #SoberaniaDigital #FlávioBolsonaro #BigTechs (translated)
Karina Michelin wrote that Edson Fachin received the Federal Police's director-general, Andrei Rodrigues, on Tuesday, October 13, and demanded that all mentions of STF ministers in the investigations be gathered. According to her, Fachin also established that any investigation against members of the Court would depend on authorization from the plenary, after a manifestation from the PGR. Michelin classified the decision as contradictory and stated that, in 2022, the STF itself had decided that a rapporteur could authorize investigations against state judges without approval from the collegiate. She added that, faced with suspicions involving the judiciary's leadership, it would be up to the ministers themselves to decide whether the investigations could proceed. #STF #Justiça #Direitos (translated)
Carlos Bolsonaro questioned the claims that any Brazilian court would favor Flávio Bolsonaro. He compared the conditions and possibilities that, as he wrote, Lula enjoyed with those that the highest court of the Brazilian judiciary would have prevented Jair Bolsonaro from exercising. Carlos said it was necessary to expose the facts to avoid, in his view, that part of the press diverted attention from new abuses by the faction. He also stated that the system would once again try to bring Lula and his organization to power and advocated for a change on the 25th, with Flávio Bolsonaro, number 22. #Justiça #Política #Eleições2022 (translated)
Kriska Carvalho argued that Kássio Nunes Marques should be denounced for his actions in the TSE, which she considered authoritarian and favorable to Flávio Bolsonaro. She stated that the order to take down Janones' channel constituted censorship and said that criticizing it did not mean attacking the Judiciary. Carvalho also accused Globo of acting against Lula throughout the campaign, with misinformation and unproven attacks. According to her, the network returned to using the subject of Lulinha, which harmed the outcome of the first round, and this practice had been occurring since 1989. She added that Folha had already pointed out censorship in Nunes Marques' actions. The author said she would continue to criticize the minister and call Globo a coup plotter. She also stated that those involved were “in coup mode” and argued that they should be denounced and confronted, instead of remaining silent out of fear or purism. #Censura #Ditadura #Justiça (translated)
Janoninho argued that the mobilization in defense of democracy should not turn against the judiciary. He stated that it was necessary to comply with the decisions and trust the Brazilian Justice, without undermining the institutions, and contrasted this position with that of the far-right. https://t.co/wJdjFyvjoe #Democracia #Justiça #DireitosHumanos (translated)
Gustavo Tutinha argued that Vasco should terminate its contract with Greenleaf. He claimed that the company had produced controversial reports and opinions in the legal dispute over Maracanã, used against the club's interests. Tutinha also requested that the MPRJ, PGE, and control bodies investigate the stadium's concession contract and compliance with the notice, especially in the application of technical and equitable criteria. According to him, the concessionaire managed a public asset and should be accountable for its decisions. Finally, he requested an investigation into the actions of the vice-president of TJRJ, Suely Lopes Magalhães, including the circumstances and competence of her decision, the compliance with the rules of the judicial planton, and the contradictions that, according to him, were pointed out in the decision that subsequently reconsidered its effects. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)
Leandro Ruschel stated that Rachadones produced a large amount of fake news for years without being punished. He criticized the Secretary of Combatting Disinformation for saying that no irregularities were found and recalled that the former director of the agency, who led him during the 2022 elections, reported that the secretary had acted as a censorship body against the right. Ruschel questioned how far the left, according to him, had taken over the judiciary. #FakeNews #Censura #Desinformação (translated)
Gustavo Tutinha stated that Suely Lopes Magalhães, vice president of TJRJ, was in the Netherlands and was not part of the judiciary's on-call service when she made a decision that he considered disconnected in a writ of security. According to him, the judge responsible for the appeal later overturned the decision. Tutinha also asked if they could talk about her calmly. #Justiça #TJRJ #MandadoDeSegurança (translated)
Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. submitted a statement to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro on Monday (12) against Vasco's requests. The company requested that the injunction that suspended the authorization for the club to use Maracanã in the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20, be maintained. According to the concessionaire, Vasco had started ticket sales and confirmed the stadium to CONMEBOL after obtaining a favorable decision on October 9, although knowing that it could be reversed. Fla-Flu also alleged that the club continued sales after the suspension of the decision on October 10, and that this conduct worsened the urgency of the case. The company stated that CONMEBOL's deadline to indicate the stadium had been extended until October 13 at 12 PM, and argued that Vasco should use this period to reorganize the match. The concessionaire cited a document from the Military Police dated October 4, which, according to them, acknowledged conditions for the game at Estádio Nilton Santos. They also criticized the recommendation from the Public Ministry in favor of Maracanã, claiming that it did not consider this subsequent document. Fla-Flu further argued that the writ of security was legally appropriate and questioned the favorable decision to Vasco, granted on October 9, claiming that it altered a previous understanding without new facts and by an authority that, in the company's interpretation, did not have the competence to do so. #FlaFlu #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)
Attention, fans of Vasco! It was reported that Vasco da Gama presented a 32-page manifestation to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro and asked the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto to reconsider the ruling that suspended the authorization to use Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20. According to the publication, the club pointed out the extension, by CONMEBOL, until October 13, at noon, of the deadline to confirm the stadium. It also questioned the writ of security from the conceding company Fla-Flu, invoked the priority of official football games provided for in the concession agreement, and cited assessments from the Military Police and statements from the Public Ministry regarding security and logistics. Vasco acknowledged that Estádio Nilton Santos could host the match but argued that this did not justify preventing the use of Maracanã. The publication added that the club requested the restoration of the decision by judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from October 9, which had authorized the game in Maracanã, and contested the adequacy of the writ of security from the conceding company. The request still depended on a new court decision, the profile reported. #Vasco #CopaSulAmericana #Maracanã (translated)
Leandro Ruschel stated that Edson Fachin was advocating for a reform of the Judiciary without altering guarantees, but he questioned which guarantees he was referring to. According to Ruschel, in recent years, the Federal Supreme Court had restricted constitutional rights such as free expression, association, and manifestation, in addition to the right to defense, the natural judge, and due process. He said this had occurred especially with people who did not align with what he called the court's leftism. Ruschel also criticized the defense that the reform should be made "with the Judiciary." According to him, it is up to the Legislative to draft laws, while the Judiciary should apply them and assess their compatibility with the Constitution. He added that courts can propose laws regarding their own organization, but the decision falls to Congress, and they cannot present constitutional amendments. For Ruschel, the expression used by Fachin would be a euphemism for the usurpation of Congress's powers. #Judiciário #Reforma #GarantiasCivis (translated)
Julio Schneider stated that it would be difficult to improve the Judiciary in the face of corporatism and the blatant concern for self-interests. He also said it would be clear to whom, according to him, that group served, and used derogatory language to refer to its members. https://t.co/lyvrWVfiFh #Judiciário #Reforma #Política (translated)
Vinicius Carrion stated that corporatism and the focus on personal interests would hinder the improvement of the Judiciary. He said that the need for reform indicated, in his assessment, that the system was already weak and did not meet the expectations of taxpayers. https://t.co/8zQY5EPJgz #Justiça #ReformaJudiciária #Corporativismo (translated)
Gustavo Tutinha stated that the vice president of the TJ, whom he referred to as Dona Suely, decided during the judicial shift on Saturday afternoon that the internal regulations of the court itself were not valid. He reacted with irony and said he believed the situation was clear. #justiça #TJ #direito (translated)
Jeffrey Chiquini stated that the reform of the Judiciary should eliminate political appointments to the higher courts. He said that a Judiciary made up of politicians in robes would not be independent and advocated for judicial independence as a condition for impartiality. Chiquini declared that, in the first week of the legislature, he would call public hearings to start discussions and present proposals for the reform of the justice system. According to him, entities from the sector, state and national associations of the judiciary, associations of the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Bar Association, and the Public Defender's Office would be invited. He also advocated for the appreciation of career judges, which he described as a right and a guarantee of society, and said that he would seek to restore legal security. #ReformaJudiciária #Justiça #IndependênciaJudiciária (translated)
The PGR is prosecuting judges who annulled investigations that had been underway for a long time, raising important questions about the investigation of crimes and the efficiency of the judicial system. #JavaScript #AdBlocker #WebDevelopment (translated)
