Search

The commentator described Paweł Kukiz's story about the meeting with Michał Kołodziejczak in 2019, before the elections. According to the entry, Kołodziejczak then asked Kukiz for a conversation, and during the meeting, he was supposed to call for unity under his leadership and announce a revolution. Kukiz was supposed to tell him that the services were watching him due to Agrounia's connections with Russia. The author wrote that Kołodziejczak did not understand this information and began to claim that he had fallen victim to Pegasus. He ended the entry with a question about how Kołodziejczak became a minister. #Polityka #Kukiz #Kołodziejczak (translated)

BREAKING NEWS PL reported that the director of the Zoo in Łączna called the accusations a load of nonsense and said that the reports regarding the zoo were made by DIOZ and a person who previously worked there and currently works at DIOZ. https://t.co/VFs04CJTYl #zoo #Łączna #bzdury (translated)

Radosław Fogiel wrote that the minister coordinating special services publicly presented what he believed to be false information based on an image from the internet, claiming that it came from the ABW. He assessed that it was especially compromising, although he did not have high expectations of the government. #polityka #rząd #kompromitacja (translated)

Katarzyna Treter-Sierpińska wrote that after her earlier post about families fighting with doctors for the lives of the sick, doctors on X accused her of writing nonsense. She reiterated the accusation that in Polish hospitals doctors cause patients to die through negligence, thoughtlessness, and disregard, and stated that the described child could have survived. #zdrowie #szpitale #politykamedyczna (translated)

The Night Penguin wrote that he had not heard such a great misunderstanding of the situation in the region for a long time. According to him, Romanowski had unsuccessfully tried to gently explain to Zajączkowska-Hernik that she was making no sense. He added that the Confederates were so strongly under the influence of disinformation that they probably believed the nonsense they were repeating themselves. #dezinformacja #polityka #festiwal (translated)

The commentator referred to the criticism from Krzysztof Stanowski towards Barbara Mróz-Gorgoń. Stanowski accused her of irresponsible spending and attempting to allocate several hundred million for — as he put it — trivial purposes. He pointed out that she had not been charged with any allegations and criticized her statement that she has it worse in Poland than a criminal. He added that it would indeed be the case if she were in prison. The commentator assessed the situation as one of the biggest embarrassments of recent years. #kompromitacja #polityka #media (translated)

Marek Miśko supported a tough tactic and stated that people writing such comments should be afraid of publishing them. He pointed out that the issue concerns common security, not distant topics. He suggested sending the person who — as he assessed — was talking nonsense to a laundromat, where they could say whatever they want. He added that the latest "Czuwaj" was already available on the channel and wished the audience a good day. #bezpieczeństwo #taktyka #komentarze (translated)

Albin questioned the competence of journalists while commenting on the material in TVP Info. He wrote that Buda claimed that Poles lost 100 billion zł because fuel did not cost 5.19 zł, as Tusk had promised. Albin accused the host of not responding and insultingly assessed his intelligence. #dziennikarstwo #Polska #media (translated)

Lemingopedia mentioned that in 2008, when he was 19 years old, youth unemployment in Poland was nearly 20 percent, and the minimum wage was around 850–900 zlotys net. He described going abroad as a result of a lack of prospects and noted that many emigrants did not return to the country. He argued that Eldo's song "Nie pytaj o nią" gave young people hope for a change in Poland's fate. The author stated that his generation worked hard to make the country a source of pride and achieved success at a high cost and out of love for their homeland. He also recalled the year 2023 when Wini interviewed Rafał Trzaskowski in his car during the election campaign. Lemingopedia assessed the conversation as artificial and stated that Poles did not support Trzaskowski. Referring to Wini's statements from 2026, the author wrote that he criticized rappers for legitimizing politicians instead of criticizing them, and he considered Eldo's performance at President Karol Nawrocki's event and photos of other rappers with the president as unsuccessful. Lemingopedia accused Wini of previously promoting Trzaskowski during the campaign. He also quoted Eldo's explanation that he interpreted the invitation as a call from the Republic, not from Karol Nawrocki. Lemingopedia expressed respect for Eldo, writing that the artist had not changed his understanding of the Republic. He called on parents to speak to their children about Poland as a country that can be strong, wise, and beautiful, and to encourage them to work and build its future with pride. He criticized what he referred to as the expulsion of names from textbooks in the name of "modernity" and "pedagogy of shame" as well as grants from the Batory Foundation. https://t.co/8NPL5yAO8g #Polska #Rzeczypospolita #Młodzież (translated)

The Investor Profession wrote that he calmly demonstrated in one of the episodes that the stock market in the long term is a positive-sum game. He accused Robert Gwiazdowski of having given a lecture titled "Casino Royale" at the WallStreet conference several years ago on a topic he—according to the author—was not knowledgeable about, and investors pointed out his mistakes. According to the Investor Profession, that criticism hurt Gwiazdowski's professorial ego, and from then on he periodically returned to the anecdote and boasted about the outrage it had provoked. The author added that a scientist should seek ways to overturn their own theses and change them in light of evidence. He also crudely suggested that Gwiazdowski should publicly compromise himself during his next television appearance, claiming that it would provoke similar controversies and substantive effects but would create a less socially harmful anecdote. #inwestycje #rynekakcji #finanse (translated)

I understand that you are not an economist, but after all, you have an entire army of "advisors" at your disposal... Because this is no longer information relayed by Moody. This is your RHETORIC. Just like with the debt. "In four years, the government increases debt by a trillion." The thing is, four years have not yet passed 🤷‍♂️ You are already linking the executed debt with a FUTURE FORECAST and then dividing that amount by the number of residents, announcing that a newborn has "26 thousand zł of debt." How do you come to such absurd conclusions?? I won't say it's not impressive... But public debt is not a personal obligation that is assigned to a child's account. And then there's the Constitutional Tribunal. You sign a law, still consider it unconstitutional, and send it to the Tribunal. The same Tribunal that the ECtHR has found to violate the right to a court set by law in the Xero Flor case, and the Grand Chamber of the CJEU in case C-448/23 stated that it does not meet the requirement of an independent and impartial court due to serious irregularities concerning its composition. And just minutes earlier, you said: "I'm not looking at legal loopholes." The Constitution and the legality of state organs are not "legal loopholes," Mr. Guardian of the Constitution 🤦‍♂️ And in the end, you say that you don't want "constant political war"... After a speech in which words fall: - blackmail, - the government’s ATM, - the government's financial catastrophe, - the prime minister's political plan and unsubstantiated claims that the government deliberately maintains high fuel prices to profit from them. I won't judge intentions. I assess the content. And the content of the official statement by the person holding the highest office in the state should withstand confrontation with documents 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Here - in many key areas - it does not withstand. I will no longer dwell on this speech, as I believe it is a waste of time. I'll just say this. I don't know who prepared this text for you. However, I do know that you read it, you delivered it, and you take responsibility for every word. And you repeated nonsense and manipulations that have long circulated in the statements of people from your Chancellery — which I have already corrected multiple times. The worst part is that many of them don't even take long to verify. You just need to open the documents from your own Chancellery. I really don't envy you. It only pains me your slogan: "First Poland, first Poles." Because Poland and Poles should truly come first - even before political interests, party narratives, and the need for another conflict. You cannot appeal to the good of citizens while simultaneously playing with their trust in the state, providing them from the highest office with half-truths, insinuations, and political assessments cloaked as facts. This is not about whether someone likes this government. It's about accountability for words. Especially from this office 🫣 #Polska #Polityka #Ekonomia (translated)

Mr. Nawrocki, Unfortunately, I listened to this hmmm "message" and checked it against the documents. And, as usual, I have a problem. A big one. Because when you set aside the gestures, the teleprompter, and the political phrases, what remains is a series of facts mixed with half-truths, altered chronology, forecasts presented as certainties, and accusations that are not even confirmed by the documents of your own Office and a mass of other manipulations. Step by step. "The campaign promise of fuel at 5.19." No. Mr. Donald Tusk’s specific statement about 5.19 PLN was made in JUNE 2022. Parliamentary elections were scheduled for August 8, 2023. Only then did the election campaign begin in the sense of the Electoral Code. But it gets much more interesting with your quote... In the message, you connected 5.19 PLN, "one simple decision," and... a VAT reduction 🤦‍♂️ However, in the original statement about 5.19, Tusk talked about the MARGINS of Orlen and Lotos. And in a later statement about "one decision," he also talked about limiting Orlen's profits. Not about VAT! 🤦‍♂️ You are manipulating the Prime Minister's statement, and you are using the institution of the Address to the Nation for that... Exactly the same version about VAT was spread by Mr. Bogucki in the morning, but in his case, nothing surprises me anymore. A coincidence? Let’s move on. You claim that your project would cause "an immediate drop in fuel prices of over 2 PLN." Meanwhile, your OWN justification explicitly states that the mechanism DOES NOT START when the law comes into force. First, specific market conditions must occur. Then the Council of Ministers MAY issue a regulation. Only then does the mechanism begin to work. Where is the "immediate" here? Did you read your "own" project? Or are you just repeating this nonsense from Mr. Przydacz? Moreover, earlier materials from KPRP talked about an ESTIMATE of 1.70–2.60 PLN 🤦‍♂️ In the address, the estimate has already turned into a guaranteed effect 🤦‍♂️ Next, you say that the project is "good for the budget"... Meanwhile, your own justification predicts a loss of up to 600 million PLN just from the retail sales tax and further, unestimated costs of any potential excise tax reduction. I ask again - did you read your own project? Because you probably didn’t write it manually... Even more interesting. In the address: "The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices." In the justification of your project: market disruptions have an "objective character and are independent of entrepreneurs and the government".... So please decide. Full responsibility of the government or factors independent of the government? Because both versions cannot be true at the same time 🤦‍♂️ "The Marshal of the Sejm freezes the project." The project was submitted on September 18. On the same day, it was directed to the Legislative Office and BEOS. Then for opinions and consultations. Moreover, KPRP talked about the possibility of "freezing" as early as September 17 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ THE DAY BEFORE THE PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE SEJM! So first, a narrative about freezing was created, and only later did the Marshal receive the bill 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Are you communicating with the rest of the "experts" in your office?? Next, we hear that the government deliberately keeps prices high because it wants to profit from VAT and dividends from Orlen. Proof? None was provided! A higher price may mean higher nominal VAT revenues. Orlen can pay dividends to shareholders. But one does not imply the other: this is NOT proof that the government deliberately keeps fuel prices high. This is attributing a motive without providing evidence 🤦‍♂️ Then you sign the law and say: "Every zloty obtained from this law must be spent on reducing fuel prices." A moment earlier, you conceded that the law DOES NOT CONTAIN a mechanism for passing that money on to reduce prices 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Exactly. So it "mustn't." This is your political demand, not the legal effect of the signed law 🤷‍♂️ Moody’s? Yes. Here, the fact is a fact: Poland's rating was lowered from A2 to A3. But why was there no information that at the same time, the outlook was changed from negative to STABLE? Why does the rating decision then create a vision that "tomorrow there may not be enough for pensions and armaments"? #Polska #Polityka #Fakty (translated)

Panie Leśkiewicz, mam nadzieję, że w końcu zdobędzie się Pan na odwagę i odpowie mi publicznie. W końcu "po pierwsze Polacy" - tak? Skoro Kancelaria twierdzi, że ten projekt "doprowadzi do realnej obniżki cen paliw", to postanowiłem pokrótce przedstawić opinii publicznej jego rzeczywistą treść. Nie konferencję prasową. Nie hasła. Nie marketing polityczny jak macie państwo w zwyczaju robić a: Projekt ustawy. Bo mam wrażenie, że właśnie tego elementu w państwa wypowiedziach konsekwentnie brakuje. Bo z samego tekstu ustawy wynika coś znacznie mniej efektownego 🤷‍♂️ Po pierwsze: maksymalne marże nie zostają ustalone ustawą. Projekt stanowi jedynie, że po spełnieniu określonych przesłanek Rada Ministrów MOŻE wydać rozporządzenie i dopiero w nim określić wysokość marż. Sam projekt nie mówi, czy będzie to 20 groszy, 50 groszy czy 1 zł. Nie mówi też, że rozporządzenie musi zostać wydane 🤷‍♂️ Po drugie: z akcyzą jest dokładnie tak samo. Minister Finansów MOŻE ją obniżyć. Nie musi. Państwa własne uzasadnienie przyznaje wprost, że skali skutków finansowych nie da się dokładnie oszacować, bo zależy ona od tego, czy minister w ogóle skorzysta z tej możliwości, na jak długo i w jakiej wysokości.🤦‍♂️ Po trzecie: projektodawca - pan Nawrocki, sam przyznaje, że obniżenie podatków pośrednich nie gwarantuje pełnego przełożenia korzyści na ceny detaliczne. Mimo to Kancelaria publicznie mówi o "natychmiastowej" obniżce i operuje kwotami rzędu 1,70–2,60 zł na litrze, choć takiej gwarancji w ustawie po prostu nie ma 🤦‍♂️ Po czwarte: Projekt automatycznie zmniejsza dochody budzetu z podatku od sprzedaży detalicznej, według własnego uzasadnienia nawet o 600 mln zł. Ewentualna obniżka akcyzy oznaczałaby dalszy ubytek dochodów, którego projektodawca sam nie potrafi dziś określić 🤦‍♂️ I tu zaczyna się problem zasadniczy. Art. 118 ust. 3 Konstytucji wymaga przedstawienia skutków finansowych projektu. Regulamin Sejmu wymaga ponadto wskazania źródeł finansowania, jeżeli projekt pociąga za sobą obciążenie budżetu 🤷‍♂️ Nie wystarczy więc napisać: minister może obniżyć akcyzę, rząd może ograniczyć marże, a następnie ogłosić obywatelom, że Prezydent obniży ceny paliw 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Bo Prezydent w tym projekcie cen paliw NIE OBNIŻA !. Tworzy instrumenty, których użycie pozostawia innym organom ! Rządowi. Ministrowi Finansów. Organom wykonawczym. A potem powstaje bardzo wygodna konstrukcja polityczna: Prezydent chciał. Rząd nie zrobił, Minister Finansów nie obniżył. Cena nie spadła? Winny rząd ! Cena spadła, ale kosztem kolejnego ubytku dochodów państwa? Prezydent może ogłosić sukces, a odpowiedzialność za deficyt nadal pozostaje po stronie rządu 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ W mojej opinii właśnie dlatego ten projekt jest tak zle skonstruowany, ja nawet nie nazwałbym tego "projektem ustawy". Odpowiedzialny projektodawca powinien pokazać realny mechanizm, realny koszt, realne źródło jego pokrycia i realny skutek prawny. A nie napisać ustawę, w której najważniejsze decyzje mają później podejmować inni, po czym już na etapie kampanii informacyjnej przypisywać sobie przyszły sukces. Tak się nie pisze dobrej ustawy. Tak się pisze bardzo wygodny polityczny alibi. I naprawdę nie trzeba wierzyć mi na słowo. Wystarczy przeczytać art. 34b projektu oraz jego własne uzasadnienie 🤷‍♂️ Więc mam jedno małe, ale zasadnicze pytanie, panie Leśkiewicz: czy Pan w ogóle czytał ten projekt, czy ktoś po prostu kazał Panu powtarzać takie bzdury? Odpowie Pan merytorycznie, czy znowu schowa głowę w piasek ? #Polska #prawo #polityka

Paulina Hennig-Kloska o cenach prądu: „Póki co ceny za tego rządu tylko taniały, to nie są kompletne bzdury, TANIAŁY”. Ona żyje w jakiejś innej rzeczywistości. https://t.co/OtPDMdltdk #Polska #energia #ceny

Donald Tusk pomawia Karola Nawrockiego. - Donald Tusk insynuuje, że jakaś osoba w Stanach Zjednoczonych lobbuje za zawetowaniem przez Karola Nawrockiego ustawy podnoszącej podatek akcyzowy na alkohol. - Premier dodaje, że osoba ta może próbować przekupić prezydenta kwotą $200 000. On tak może opowiadać dowolne bzdury bez konsekwencji? Niech ktoś to zatrzyma. #Polityka #DonaldTusk #KarolNawrocki

Dawno nie czytałem większej historycznej bzdury. Polska jest w stanie bez problemu wykazać ciągłość państwową, polityczną, kulturową i cywilizacyjną między kolejnymi iteracjami swojej państwowości. Ruś Kijowska i Ukraina to z kolei zupełnie inne twory państwowe, jedynie znajdujące się na przestrzeni kilkuset lat na częściowo podobnym terenie. Jeden istniał do XIII wieku jako jedno z księstw postwikińskich, a współczesna Ukraina to państwo narodu, który wykształcił się w XIX wieku. Równie dobrze współcześni Rumuni mogliby na swoich banknotach drukować cesarzy rzymskich, bo przez 200 lat Dacja była częścią Cesarstwa. #historia #Polska #Ukraina

Dzisiejszy dzień świetnie pokazuje jaką prawica ma możliwość pchania własnej narracji w sieci. Po wczorajszym zbłaźnieniu Nawrockiego swoją wypowiedzią trzeba szybko było to czymś przykryć - nie można pozwolić by ludzie o tym mówili cały dzień. Więc o północy wychodzi Przydacz i mówi - TUSK KŁAMIE, ŻADNEGO RAPORTU CIA NA BIURKU NIE BYŁO. Żadnego źródła, po prostu nagle oświadcza coś takiego w temacie wypowiedzi sprzed 8 dni. Jest to błyskawicznie podchwytywane przez wszystkie prawicowe konta, a wpis Przydacza staje się błyskawicznie jego najwięcej wyświetlanym komentarzem. Pechowo dla niego szef BBN zaprzeczył jego słowom w już wyemitowanym wywiadzie, gdzie przyznał, że kancelaria Nawrockiego została poinformowana o tym co raportowało CIA. Trzeba było więc szybko zrobić małą roszadę no i tak, może CIA poinformowało, ale raport nie był papierowy, przez co nie był na biurku no i Tuskowi przekazał go Siemoniak, a nie osobiście szef CIA (mimo, że taka jest rola Siemoniaka jako koordynatora służb specjalnych). Czy kogoś obchodzą fakty? Nie, każde prawicowe konto rzuciło się powielać te bzdury, że TUSK SKŁAMAŁ i nawoływać do dymisji. Tysiące lajków, setki tysięcy wyświetleń - nikt z nich się nawet nie zająknął na temat wywiadu Grodeckiego, liczy się zalanie internetu konkretnym przekazem. P.S. A w tym wszystkim jeszcze zakryli informacje, że kolejni ludzie PiSu, czołowi dziennikarze Republiki Marcin Dobski i Sławomir Jastrzębowski brali kasę od Zondacrypto za bronienie Krala w sieci. #Polska #prawica #media