Search

Mika Merano wrote that it was not about class but corruption. He claimed that Members of Parliament, other significant and former politicians, and their close circles received rewards on the boards of associations funded by tax money or directed funds to their own projects. According to Merano, organizational subsidies and, for example, the funds used for Garden Helsinki were taken from elsewhere and were also reflected in the support received by poor families living on subsidies. He accused politicians of pursuing their own and their close circles' interests and expressed his anger towards such activities. #korruptio #politiikka #veronmaksajat (translated)

Leena Pihanurmi criticized the allocation of tax funds to the close circles she described and wrote that money was collected at coffee and pastry meetings. According to her, eight members of parliament and three members of the European Parliament served as chairpersons of the boards of organizations receiving STEA funding: four from the SDP, two from the Left, two from the Greens, two from the National Coalition, and one from the Centre. #järjestörälssi #VeronmaksajanKukkarolla https://t.co/fp5Qnipiks #järjestörälssi #verovarat #tuki (translated)

Joni Juusela wrote that it was not surprising to him that those who fought for Rälssi™ were not selfless defenders of the weak, but rather pursued their own financial interests. He compared the situation to a politician owning a company and directing taxpayers' money to it. #Rälssi #politiikka #korruptio (translated)

Matti Hämeenaho criticized the representatives of the National Coalition Party and wrote that they are now demanding cuts, even though, in his opinion, the 10 billion euro list of cuts brought to the meeting in Riga was not approved, and instead, the value-added tax was increased. According to Hämeenaho, small "fringe cuts" were strongly opposed, and he emphasized that actions are decisive. https://t.co/aw105p36Jc #politiikka #talous #Suomi (translated)

Tuulia Alanko wrote that many others besides traditional supporters of the Finns Party had also expressed similar views, in her opinion. She praised Riikka and the Finns Party ministers for their responsibility and ability to implement. Alanko stated that the Finns Party, according to her, did not want to serve the elite or accept unrestricted use of taxpayers' money. She criticized the Social Democrats for their talk about civil society and believed that climate actions alone did not address the challenges related to immigration or hybrid operations. Alanko described the Minister of the Interior as having acted to reform immigration policy and demanded changes to open invitations for immigration and the granting of citizenship. She also praised the Finns Party Minister of Justice for changing the line on criminal law and tightening penalties, even though, according to her, he had been criticized for populism. Alanko wrote that neither Riikka nor other members of the Finns Party should change their positions to please everyone. She believed the party would maintain its stance despite red-green criticism and pressure, describing the Finns Party as a caretaker party. #persut #poliitika #Suomi (translated)

Raimo Savipakka wrote that he agrees with Jari. He urged to reduce the public sector, development aid, and the status of the nobility, as well as to carry out municipal mergers and reduce the number of social and healthcare regions. According to Savipakka, pensions should not be touched, however. https://t.co/adBi50XaJ9 #Suomi #politiikka #talous (translated)

Petteri Hietanen denied that the decline in support for the National Coalition Party was due to the Finns Party. According to him, the National Coalition Party lost support because, in his opinion, it did not serve right-wing Finns sufficiently, protected the elite, and catered to the media and the left. Hietanen also criticized the party for not having fixed the YEL system, exaggerating racism, and failing to address lax spending. #Kokoomus #politiikka #Suomi (translated)

Jari Sarasvuo criticized the government's actions as slow and insufficient in the face of the country's threatening situation. He wrote that the right-wing had expected the government to take a more vigorous and dynamic approach and to show more courage. According to him, the correction of YEL was still a thing of the future. Sarasvuo also accused the government of coddling a privileged elite and questioned why the support for the Finns Party was growing and at whose expense. He admitted that the government had done a lot of good, but said it was no longer enough. Sarasvuo wrote that the abolishment of the National Agency for Education would have sent a message that wrongdoing has consequences. He praised the decision to end political harassment strikes as a good start and urged the government to continue on the same path, to act more quickly, and to move more boldly to the right. #politiikka #koulutus #tulevaisuus (translated)

Jari Mäkäräinen criticized Yle for often choosing female journalists to incite moral panic, according to him. He interpreted Yle's analysis as showing that support for the National Coalition Party among women had dropped to 12 percent and that the Finns Party had surpassed this party. However, according to Mäkäräinen, women were not punishing the National Coalition Party for its policies but for its austerity measures, and men were supporting the state. Mäkäräinen believed that the decline in women's support was due to the impact of budget cuts on sectors predominantly employing women, such as social services, organizations, and public services. In his view, this did not make the cuts unjust, but rather highlighted their effects. He mentioned the Social Democratic Party, the Left Alliance, and the Centre Party as the most popular parties among women and claimed that the left proposed tax increases amounting to nine billion euros. According to Mäkäräinen, the costs of these increases would fall on men who work overtime, start businesses, and pay progressive taxes. Mäkäräinen assessed that the issue for the National Coalition Party was its attempt to soften difficult decisions, while the Finns Party spoke about the same issues more directly. He argued that men were underrepresented in the care sector and overrepresented in dangerous jobs, entrepreneurship, and at the high end of the tax revenue spectrum. In his opinion, the National Coalition Party should maintain its stance even if it lost some female support, as this could help it win over voters who support the sustainability of the state. https://t.co/DfwLyPN03s #Politiikka #NaistenOikeudet #Taloustieto (translated)

Leena Pihanurmi wrote that according to Yle's analysis, the support for the National Coalition Party had decreased because the party had supported the government during the scandals of the True Finns related to racism and had listened to the minister's descriptions of organizations as a privileged elite. She asked how this explained the rise in support for the True Finns. https://t.co/G28AlCxNTc #Politiikka #Suomi #Yle (translated)

Dystocracy wrote that the members of the National Coalition Party did not need to believe the warnings that the voters' risk analysis pointed to a blue-red cooperation and a noble class uprising. He sarcastically noted that things were going well with the current approach, and suggested as an alternative a clear no-response to the red machine as well as a common right-wing program framework. https://t.co/2B7dk8Lo37 #politiikka #oikeisto #vaalit (translated)

Rälssi imee veronmaksajien rahoja. Kumpi on osuvampi kuvaus rälssille? a) Vampyyri b) Loinen Lähde: Aamuposti https://t.co/UqiTztpjRq #verot #keskustelu #suomi

Tänään HS antaa näkyvyyttä järjestörälssin yhdelle merkittävälle rälssipomolle, Suomen nuorisoala ry:n (ent. Allianssi ry) tj:lle. Hänen mielestään - tietenkin - on veronmaksajien tehtävä rahoittaa kansalaisjärjestöjä ja niiden harjoittamaa lobbausta. 1/6 https://t.co/J0TRssbeRP #nuoriso #järjestöt #lobbauksenetiketti

Rehellisesti sanottuna alkaa vaikuttaa siltä, että tavoitteena on oikeistosta nousevan järjestelmään ja rälssiin kohdistetun kritiikin tukahduttaminen leimaamalla se joksikin vaaralliseksi tai ainakin vihjailla siinä olevan jotain epäilyttävää. Ylen ja vasemmistopoliitikkojen lisäksi vihjailua on tehnyt pari muutakin tahoa viime aikoina. Rehellinen ja suora puhe tai nykyisen poliittisen eliitin, jonka kanssa perinnemedia on epäpyhässä liitossa, kritisointi ei ole ääri- tai laitaoikeistolaisuutta saatika väärin tai yhteiskunnalle haitallista. On luonnollista ja odotettavaa, että ne instituutiot ja järjestelmät, jotka ovat olemassa vain siksi, ettei niiden olemassaoloa ole kyseenalaistettu riittävästi, aloittavat mustamaalauskampanjan, kun huomaavat asemansa olevan uhatun. Se on myös merkki siitä, että puheella ja kritiikillä on merkitystä. Kritisoiva ja muutosta vaativa joukko on jo kasvanut niin suureksi ja on niin heterogeeninen, ettei jonkun yhden ihmisen tai ryhmän leimaaminen ei-toivotuksi auta. Jatkaakaahan paremman tulevaisuuden edestä puhumista ja tekemistä. Se ei ole laita- tai äärimitään, vaan isänmaallisuutta sekä rakkautta omaa kansaa, kieltä, kulttuuria ja perinnettä sekä Suomen olemassaoloa ja tulevaisuutta kohtaan. #politiikka #kritisointi #Suomi

Sivistusrahaston rälssissä toimitusjohtajana toimiva Demari, Ulla Vuolanne ei nähnyt syytä epäillä vanhuksen toimintakykyä. HÄN NOUTI VANHUKSEN Geriatriselta osastolta jossa hoidetaan ikääntyneitä ja muistisairaita dementikoita. Törkeää. Aivan töerkeää. https://t.co/7pHdYe6Td2 #vanhukset #dementia #terveydenhuolto

Ihan mielenkiinnosta kuinka siirto edes onnistui? Yritämme suvun kesken vähän lahjoitella toisillemme, ja jo muutamaan tonniin jää siirrot kiinni, ja pitää toimittaa pitkä selitys mistä raha on tullut ja mihin se on menossa? Ilmeisesti jäsenkirja ohittaa pankin prosessit ja 100 tonnia löysi uuden kodin demarien rälssistä. #lahjoitus #rahasiirto #perhe