Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Forum for Democracy wrote that groceries were almost unaffordable for many Dutch people. The party stated that Biem Yati had proposed reducing the VAT rates to 6% and 19%, and suggested that this could be funded by stopping spending on climate and foreign aid. According to Forum for Democracy, the House voted against it. https://t.co/3v6RqYojqf #Boodschappen #Economie #BTW (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the Netherlands would hold elections for the Provincial States and water boards in March. The party called on interested parties to register by October 31 at the latest to become actively involved on behalf of FVD and referred to a website. https://t.co/m1ypuM1Hvk https://t.co/pSv5Jrx9Hd #verkiezingen #FVD #Nederland (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that Jesse Klaver, according to the party, loved migration so much that he denied its disruptive effects on the housing market. The party stated that Lidewij de Vos pointed out the facts to him. https://t.co/76tVUpMwvy #Migratie #Woningmarkt #Feiten (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the demand for care increased while the sector was facing a high turnover of staff and, according to the party, there was an annual underbudgeting for the core department. The party asked how that came to be. Pepijn van Houwelingen demanded change and stated that the Netherlands needed to become a leader again in the field of care and welfare. https://t.co/OBVfr2h8aq #zorg #welzijn #gezondheid (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the protection of babies should be self-evident, but according to the party, it is not always provided in the Netherlands. The party claimed that babies born after 23 weeks of pregnancy who have a real chance of survival do not receive life-saving care. As a reason, Forum for Democracy mentioned the potential consequences for abortion rights if babies of that age are recognized as viable. #Levensvatbaarheid #Abortusdebath (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that the cabinet wanted to make hybrid heat pumps mandatory from 2029. According to the party, this would cost households a minimum of 6,000 euros, even after subsidies, which it claimed came from taxpayer money. Tom Russcher demanded that the minister put an end to what the party called expensive climate hysteria. https://t.co/plHHrhyx9J #klimaat #duurzaamheid #warmtepomp (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the quality of education and results had drastically deteriorated under D66. According to the party, instead of taking responsibility, D66 cast suspicion on the Renaissance School and its proven teaching methods. The party wrote that Peter pointed out the facts to the democrat. https://t.co/IcOaSEmFUI #onderwijs #D66 #kwaliteit (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the EU migration pact had not halted migration and called the promise about it a lie. According to the party, the EU was actually continuously facilitating more immigration. FVD advocated for the Netherlands to be able to determine again who could enter the country and who should be expelled. https://t.co/5anDyzHoxu #Migratie #Europa #FVD (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the state collects almost half a trillion in taxes, yet has a budget deficit of nearly 40 billion. According to the party, the government did not have a revenue problem, but a spending problem. They argued against spending more money on climate, war, and immigration, so that the burden on the Dutch people could decrease. https://t.co/KNKeEP95sY #belasting #begroting #uitgaven (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that the EU planned to spend hundreds of billions extra, which according to the party would severely impact Dutch taxpayers because the Netherlands is a net contributor. The party argued that this would be matched by more immigration, regulation, and militarism. According to Forum for Democracy, the EU did not serve the Dutch interest and it was time for a Nexit. https://t.co/6SeyJLAExH #Nexit #EU #belastingbetaler (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that, according to the party, entrepreneurs would pay thousands of euros in extra taxes for a fuel car for their employees if it were up to the VVD. The party argued that climate goals weighed more heavily than the mobility and freedom of choice of motorists. https://t.co/ZzSsfnD1kV #brandstofauto #belasting #klimaatdoelen (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the cabinet would build 340,000 homes for migrants within ten years, a number that the party claimed was comparable to a city the size of Rotterdam. The party wrote that Dutch citizens, in the meantime, were unable to obtain housing and often waited more than ten years on a waiting list. Tom Russcher had asked the minister what she wanted to say to these Dutch citizens. #woningnood #migratie #woningbouw (translated)

Forum for Democracy asked whether the VVD would govern with left-wing parties in the future and further increase the burdens on homeowners, motorists, and savers. The party wrote that FVD senator Eric Kemperman had posed that question to the Senate faction of the liberals. https://t.co/Gsy8iOy5nX #VVD #politiek #belasting (translated)

Forum for Democracy announced that the FVD congress would take place on Saturday, November 21, 2026, in Brabant. The party stated that thousands of FVD supporters would discuss the future of the country and invited interested parties to reserve tickets. https://t.co/jKWh92QkIb! https://t.co/zb5mPWzODA #FVD2026 #Politiek #Evenement (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that expats were unfairly favored over Dutch citizens, as they paid less tax and found it easier to obtain housing. The party wrote that the House had voted against a proposal by Biemyati to investigate an accelerated phasing out of the expat scheme, which they deemed just for Dutch people. #expats #belasting #rechtvaardigheid (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that the national government has been imposing extra taxes for decades according to the party. Next year, nurses, new entrepreneurs, and small investors would also be heavily affected according to the party. Forum for Democracy called for a smaller government, the cancellation of ideological projects, and significant tax relief. #belasting #kleineoverheid #FVD (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that PRO wanted to abolish the possibility for entrepreneurs to borrow money from their own private limited company. According to the party, Milan Schenk wondered whether left-wing people realized the consequences of such measures. The party accused socialists of financial ignorance and stated that the left depicted Dutch people who arranged their own retirement provisions as enemies. #Economie #Ondernemerschap #Politiek (translated)