Daniel Schatz wrote that Mohamed Ali had recently stated that he would return to the parliament on Monday after two weeks of vacation, but he had now reported sick. Schatz used a derogatory term for Ali and stated that he would request public records regarding the absence. Schatz claimed that the salaries of parliament members were paid by taxpayers and that absence should therefore be substantiated on proper grounds. He accused the V party of treating taxpayers' money as their own and wrote that the party itself should pay Ali's salary if it did not want him to serve in the parliament. https://t.co/GiEvESQ8jb #Riksdag #Politik #Offentlighet (translated)












