Search

Karol Nawrocki in Polsat, just before the battle for the Constitutional Tribunal and consultations at the Palace, said: — First of all, for the Tribunal to start functioning, we should ensure that it is a strong institution, respected for the authority and professionalism of the judges gathered in it (...), and not a political spoils. #KarolNawrocki #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PolitykaPolska (translated)

🔎 DEMAG appreciated the police officers who directly participated in the operation in Krakow, describing their attitude as heroic and extremely brave. He also thanked the Provincial Police Headquarters in Krakow for their quick and transparent communication, which — as he wrote — helped prevent some disinformation narratives. He also encouraged the appreciation of the professionalism of the services and other individuals involved in the actions. #Kraków #policja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author thanked the police officers for their response after the tragedy in Kraków. He wrote that the first patrol left 23 seconds after the report and expressed appreciation for the officers' professionalism, readiness, and service during difficult times. #Bohaterowie #policja #Kraków #PL (translated)

The author described a person who, despite sustaining injuries, was to rise after the fall of their shot colleague, subdue the perpetrator, and then apply a tourniquet on themselves. He concluded that in the face of such behavior, the concept of professionalism seemed insufficient, and referred to these people as heroes. #bohaterowie #odwaga #profesjonalizm #PL (translated)

Jarosław Królewski wrote that he saw no need for a detailed analysis of Michał S.'s decision, whose experience in football he rated as top-class. He noted that in football many complex processes and circumstances are at play that cannot always be publicly explained, and difficult decisions may be necessary. Referring to the recent change of coach at Wisła Kraków, Królewski stated that in large clubs no position is guaranteed, and changes can happen for various reasons. According to him, decisions about staff are influenced not only by results but also by context, direction of development, quality of work, implementation of strategy, as well as trust and collaboration within the organization. He added that a coach could lose their job after ten consecutive wins or remain in position after twenty losses. Królewski argued that clubs should rely on processes, data, technology, and decision automation, as well as build lasting institutional competencies instead of depending on individual persons. Such a model would allow preserving the values and operation of the club despite changes in the positions of president, sports director, or coach. He also emphasized the importance of passion, energy, mutual trust, and joy from working together. Finally, he wrote vulgarly that his leg hurt a lot and added that he increasingly appreciated players returning to play after tearing their anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). #PiłkaNożna #WisłaKraków #ZarządzanieSportem (translated)

Pawel Kania wrote that Poland and the West were facing military and economic threats. He claimed that a war was taking place beyond the eastern border, and Putin was keeping the President of the USA in check. He assessed that the cost of living had increased due to Russia's military actions and Donald Trump's decisions. Kania emphasized that under such conditions, it was necessary to rebuild trust in the state, its institutions, politicians, the army, and services, and that the media should provide accurate information about the situation. He called those spreading disinformation, undermining trust in the government and services, or calling for radical and illegal actions traitors. He also accused government critics and ministers of attacking police officers by comparing them to ORMO, ZOMO, and UB, spreading false information, and frightening people with the worst scenarios. He directed a question to Donald Tusk, Marcin Kierwiński, and the National Prosecutor's Office, asking why such actions are tolerated. #wojna #zaufanie #dezinformacja (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)

Michał Oleksyn wrote that the police officers intervening on Marszałkowska should receive a financial reward and a promotion for their professionalism. He particularly highlighted the brave policewoman and congratulated the Polish Police. #PolskaPolicja #Nagroda #Profesjonalizm (translated)

Sławomir Cenckiewicz wrote that after several viewings of the intervention, he deemed it unprofessional. He pointed out manifestations such as lunging at a person he described as a victim, shouting, insults, and threatening bystanders, as well as handcuffing this person on a stretcher. He added that before entering the SWS headquarters, police communication systems were left on the ground. #policja #profesjonalizm #interwencja (translated)

Monika Zła assessed that instead of a substantive discussion about the country's future, viewers saw a performance that caused embarrassment. She criticized the interlocutor's body language, considering it dismissive, as well as his chaotic rhetoric and difficulties in articulating thoughts fluidly. She also wrote that he repeated worn-out slogans and failed to present a modern perspective or solutions for citizens, focusing instead on a political dispute with the government. #polityka #dyskusja #media (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized Rafał Jankowski and the board of the NSZZ Policjantów after Jankowski stated that police officers "do not stand on the side of the government." He claimed that such a position undermines loyalty to constitutional organs of the state and could lead to anarchy. He accused Jankowski of having political ties to PiS and argued that his statement encourages police officers not to fulfill their duties. Mazguła referred to Article 27, point 1 of the Police Act of April 6, 1990, and cited the oath taken by police officers. He argued that police officers should serve Poland and its constitutional bodies, including the democratically elected government and the Minister of the Interior and Administration. He also accused the NSZZ board and Jankowski of focusing on pay and benefits. The author wrote that Jankowski did not respond to what he described as cases of death following police interventions, the use of violence against women and peaceful demonstrators, the detention of a female MP, the shooting of a “Solidarity” journalist, as well as repression and falsification of evidence against democratic opposition activists. These were Mazguła's accusations against Jankowski. Mazguła urged policewomen and policemen to serve Poland, not politics, and to use force against those breaking the law. He added that since Jankowski informed institutions of his position, he also conveyed his opinion to them. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #WojskoPolskie #Policja #Praworządność #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Magda Fitas-Czuchnowska wrote that impartiality at work should not mean a ban on holding and expressing views. In her opinion, it would be unacceptable for people to have to hide behind pseudonyms or have their civil rights limited because of their profession. She asked whether a bus driver transporting activists from one party cannot support another, and whether a doctor with different opinions is prohibited from publicly revealing them. She also cited the example of a Żabka employee near Nowogrodzka, who could lose her franchise for participating in a demonstration for the right to abortion. She emphasized that full professionalism should be maintained at work, while privately, one should not be afraid to express their own opinion. She stated that this is also the rule of law. #praworządność #wolnośćsłowa #profesjonalizm (translated)

Tomasz Siemoniak wrote that Polish services pursued individuals with determination and professionalism who — as he stated — were carrying out acts of diversion on behalf of Russian services. He mentioned that thanks to the actions of the Police and ABW, conducted in cooperation with the prosecutor's office, the German police arrested two Turkish citizens on Monday suspected of arson at the Starlink station in Wola Krobowska in September. He described the work of investigators as significant. #policja #ABW #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleya wrote that in recent hours, information about a possible attack on the prime minister and deputy prime minister was conveyed through special services, and urgent meetings were held at the Anti-Terrorist Center. The author suggested that the threat had been communicated via email and its publicity was an operation intended to divert attention from government problems. As a background, he pointed to the collapse of public finances and record state debt, knife attacks in schools, and scandals at the ministerial level, including the affair of Deputy Minister Kołodziejczak. He wrote that the authorities intentionally directed media attention to the topic of the attack in order to limit the debate on taxes, the budget deficit, and government actions. The author accused the ruling camp of fueling polarization, shifting the blame for mistakes onto political opponents, and appointing individuals who are loyal but, as he assessed, lacking competence. He also claimed that the alert about the attack was intended to provide the government with political benefits, justify state operating costs, and silence the opposition. He mentioned the creation of enemies, including the opposition and President Nawrocki. #polityka #manipulacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maciej Wewiór, replied to Minister Marcin Przydacz that he does not consider silence a part of his job when the ministry and its employees are being attacked. He wrote that Przydacz has criticized the Ministry of Foreign Affairs almost daily for weeks, sometimes several times a day, including professional diplomats and officials, including those serving Poland “under falling bombs.” According to Wewiór, Przydacz demanded professionalism and opposed “political bickering” when the spokesperson responded to his statements and corrected— as he wrote— insinuations. Wewiór added that in light of the war abroad, Russian provocations, and the unstable international situation, the minister responsible in the Presidential Chancellery for international policy should weigh his words. He explained that his job is to inform about the actions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and respond to attacks and misinformation, even when the author is a presidential minister. #Polska #dyplomacja #polityka (translated)

Robert Sermak called on Cezary Kulesza, the Polish Football Association, and the Ekstraklasa to respond to the thousands of fans and Wisła Kraków before the match. He demanded a concrete position and action within a timeframe that could still change something, defining it as a minimum of professionalism. He also reached out to Marciniak to understand the full picture of the situation. #WisłaKraków #Ekstraklasa #piłkaNożna (translated)