Search

The Socios Wisła Kraków Association called on the Polish Football Association (PZPN), its president Cezary Kulesza, and Ekstraklasa S.A. to urgently investigate Legia Warsaw's decision to close the away section and to take actions that would allow an authorized group of Wisła fans to participate in the match scheduled for October 11. The association stated that it represents over 5,000 people and considered that the closure of the sector directly affects the community it represents. Socios referred to the response from the spokesperson of the Warsaw Police Headquarters, Chief Inspector Jacek Wiśniewski, given to editor Bartosz Karcz. According to the association, the police clarified that the correspondence was initiated by Legia, and the response concerned changes proposed by the club. It was not a post-control protocol nor a reaction to a specific match or incident; the police did not order the closure of the sector nor set a deadline for modernization. Socios emphasized that, according to the police's position, the decision to make the sector available was up to Legia as the organizer of the mass event. The association pointed out that Legia justified the closure of the sector until the end of 2026 with the scope and urgency of the works. In its opinion, the necessity and duration of the restriction should be supported by specific documentation. Socios also cited information from the Board of Greenery of the City of Warsaw, according to which Legia had been using city land serving the sector without a contract since 2017, and discussions regarding the regulation of this situation began in the summer of 2026. The association noted that Legia indicated the September international break as a convenient time to resolve the land issue. Socios demanded an examination of the documents, an urgent site visit involving both clubs, the police, PZPN, and Ekstraklasa S.A., as well as checking the schedule of works and the possibility of implementing alternative solutions. It also called for an assessment of Legia's decision in terms of competition rules and infrastructure and licensing issues, and subsequently for the public presentation of the findings before the match. The association declared support for TS Wisła Kraków S.A. in legal actions related to the exclusion of an organized group of fans, including financing the costs of proceedings and legal services. It emphasized that clarifying the matter after the meeting will not restore the fans' ability to participate in it. #WisłaKraków #Ekstraklasa #PZPN (translated)

Ukrainian Minister of Agricultural Policy Taras Vysotsky estimated that Russian attacks and the blockade of export routes in the Black Sea could cost consumers worldwide up to $60 billion a year. He also noted that grain prices have already risen by an average of 25%. #Ukraina #CenyZbóż #MorzeCzarne #UA #RU (translated)

The author of the entry claimed that Pedro Sánchez had resigned and that under the pressure of corruption processes involving his wife and surroundings, as well as the crisis in Ceuta, the Prime Minister of Spain announced the dissolution of Parliament that day. He then addressed Prime Minister Tusk, writing that he prefers the Germans; the entry was cut off in the middle of the next sentence. #Hiszpania #polityka #korupcja #ES #PL #DE (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that President Karol Nawrocki's decisions were guided by the principle "first Poland, first Poles." He quoted Nawrocki's statement saying that last December the government expected 3 billion zlotys from the presidential fund, and Nawrocki transferred the funds to the National Health Fund (NFZ). Bogucki accused Donald Tusk's government of exerting pressure on fuel prices affecting Polish families, farmers, and transport companies. He claimed that the government was counting on the rejection of the law and continuing to profit from taxes and fuel margins. He reported that Nawrocki signed the law regarding excess profits of fuel corporations and attributed full responsibility for fuel prices to the government. #Polska #Prezydent #Polacy (translated)

The expert assesses that the reduction in fuel prices after the signing of the law by President Karol Nawrocki places him in a difficult situation, where every solution seems unfavorable, and his position in Polish politics may be a trap. #KarolNawrocki #podatek #CenyPaliwNiżej (translated)

If Nawrocki hadn't behaved like a spoiled brat who takes his toys and goes home when he doesn't like something, but had signed this law right away, we would have had it over two months ago. But no. It had to be sent back to the Constitutional Tribunal, which today is more of a circus than a Tribunal, to put on a show, to demonstrate how tough and unyielding he is, and then to sign the solution anyway. And now Nawrocki comes out and tells Poles about fuel priced at 5.19 zł. No way. Because the money that people spent on more expensive refueling over these weeks has already been spent. No one is giving it back. It won’t return to the household budget just because the president's political calculation changed after two months. And that's why this whole story about Poland and Poles is so hollow. Real people's money is at stake here. Their savings. Their sense of security. And then he looks at the polls, and indeed, he can sign it. Mocking people. #Polska #polityka #ekonomia (translated)

Unfortunately, the president succumbed to Donald Tusk's government and SIGNED the bill on extraordinary profits of fuel companies. I voted against this bill and was counting on a veto. Why? Because this bill, in addition to the tax (which will still be paid by consumers) and filling the government's coffers, does not eliminate the real causes of this high prices. The true cause of these high prices is, firstly, the EU climate policy and the associated taxes, which Morawiecki agreed to, and which were intensified and continued by Donald Tusk. Secondly, the obstinacy of the Polish government, which in view of the situation in the Strait of Hormuz is neither looking for nor even trying to find alternative suppliers. These are the real causes of today's expensive fuel, which neither the Polish government nor - as it seems - the Presidential Palace wants to solve. Today, the president removed his image responsibility for expensive fuel, bowed to the government, but did not solve the real causes of the problem. Prices will temporarily drop a bit, but we will still have expensive fuel and another tax to pay. Because if we were to consider today the signing of the bill by Karol Nawrocki as justified, we would have to admit that Donald Tusk's solution was good. It was not. #paliwo #polityka #gospodarka (translated)

President Nawrocki signed a bill regarding the excess profits of fuel corporations and ended the process of placing Poles in the role of political hostages! The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices! Listen to an important message from the President of Poland. Every decision of the President is summarized by the sentence: "First of all Poland, first of all Poles." The President does not look at legal tricks and political calculations, but at the effects that a given solution brings to Poles. #Polska #paliwa #prezydent (translated)

❗️EXPLANATION In connection with the politicians' spin regarding the prosecutor's opposition to the issuance of the ironclad letter, which allegedly prevented the District Court from issuing such a letter, I present statements from court rulings indicating that this is an ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT understanding of the provision of Article 281 paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 👉🏻As noted by the Court of Appeal in Gdańsk in its ruling of March 29, 2022, case file II AKz 222/22: “The understanding of the provision of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in such a way that the prosecutor's opposition would be binding on the district court would lead to systemic inconsistency and would at the same time be an expression of the prosecutor's privilege over the suspect, while reducing the district court to the role of a subordinate entity to the prosecutor's decision. Such a solution would be extremely ineffective and contradict the requirements of procedural economy, which speaks against involving in a specific proceeding as a procedural body an entity that does not have full powers to resolve the issue at stake in that proceeding. If the legislator intended to grant the prosecutor a decisive voice regarding the issuance of an ironclad letter, considering that they should be equipped with that competence as the body conducting the preparatory proceedings and responsible for its effects, they should have done so explicitly by modifying the provisions on functional competence for issuing an ironclad letter in preparatory proceedings. Since this has not been done, leaving this decision in the hands of the district court, the current regulatory provisions - given their lack of clarity and their systemic inconsistency - should be interpreted on the assumption that primacy should be given to the interpretation taking into account systemic assumptions, including rules resulting from the principles of adversariality and equality of the parties. In summary, the systemic and functional interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure leads to the conclusion that the district court considering the suspect's application for the issuance of an ironclad letter in pre-trial proceedings is not bound by the prosecutor's opposition.” 👉🏻Also, the Court of Appeal in Krakow in the case with case file II AKz 523/22 in the justification of the ruling of February 7, 2023: “Analyzing the linguistic interpretation of the aforementioned provision, it is necessary to refer to the designation of the word opposition, which is 'disagreement, protest' (according to SJP PWN - internet service), 'resisting in any form' (...). Also, in the systemic context of the criminal procedure act, 'opposition' means a lack of consent to a specific decision or procedural action and entails a negatory or cassatory effect. This is also how this institution is perceived by W. Hermeliński and B. Nita-Światłowska, indicating that after the amendment the prosecutor was supposed (allegedly) to have the possibility of 'blocking the court with their statement of disagreement on the issuance of an ironclad letter' (...). Therefore, it cannot be acknowledged that the legislator in the amendment to the procedural law on April 20, 2021, established a separate form of 'opposition' and granted the prosecutor shaping powers, i.e., the ability to bind the court with conditions under which the court would consider the suspect's application, especially in the context of applying and shaping the financial guarantee indicated in Article 283 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is also supported by the purposive and logical interpretation of the mentioned regulation. The institution of opposition contained in Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is of an extraordinary nature and was intended by the legislator to limit the judicial independence of the court. Adopting the concept of the possibility of conditioning the opposition on exonerating conditions would lead to a further limitation of the judicial independence of the court than in the case of a literal reading of the provision. (...) In summary - the prosecutor's opposition indicated in Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has a purely negatory character and cannot be burdened with any reservations. This does not take away from the prosecutor's ability to formulate a specific procedural position regarding the conditions for the issuance of an ironclad letter - nevertheless, the court ruling on the subject of the ironclad letter is not bound by them.” #prawo #polityka #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Artificial intelligence plays a key role in the fight for payment security, being both a tool for fraudsters and a solution for companies protecting transactions, as emphasized by Konrad Ślusarczyk from Visa. #BezpieczeństwoPłatności #SztucznaInteligencja #Technologie (translated)

What a cry from some, because: I called the hater "a type" and as a result "how is that, it's unacceptable!!" (the fact that he vomited insults at me obviously doesn't matter, because a PUBLIC PERSON MUST HAVE THICK SKIN 😆 Well, dear ones. THEY DO NOT HAVE TO. A public person is not someone who can be publicly insulted and made a target for public insults, abuse, and venting frustration. Words have consequences. Learn this. If you don't learn, sooner or later you will meet someone who will prove it to you. And the second cry, that I dared to mention the hater's family. Well, attention: if someone from their public account, where they have sweet pictures with family, children (!), and a respectable spouse, vomits on other people, sends them disgusting messages, insults, then yes: they involve their family in this matter. They bring shame upon it, create an opinion, and additionally facilitate tracking. That's how it works. Don't cry. Let it reach you that today you can say something to someone, and tomorrow you will have to answer for it. And neither a cowardly lack of face or name nor anything like that protects you from it. Really, there are ways. Of course, I am an absolute advocate for the lack of anonymity on social media, logging in through a mobile citizen or biometrics - I don't know, the solution should be devised by those who know better about it. But if that were the case, everyone would realize how quickly the internet space would be cleansed of rudeness, trolling, and violence. Have a nice day! #hejterstwo #socialmedia #osobapubliczna (translated)

The government is responsible for the policies affecting fuel prices. The President presented his own legislative solutions, indicating specific areas for cost reduction – primarily through limiting wholesale, refinery, and import margins, as well as measures concerning excise duty. According to the calculations presented, this could lead to a decrease in fuel prices by about 2 PLN per liter. The President of the Republic of Poland is the guardian of the Constitution. The first law was not vetoed but directed to the Constitutional Tribunal for preventive control due to the impermissible retroactive effect of the law. If the government actually sought an agreement, they would correct the provisions to ensure full compliance with the fundamental law. The proposal to declassify the annex to the report on the dissolution of WSI was prepared in the National Security Bureau strictly according to the guidelines of the Constitutional Tribunal. The document could be published immediately; however, completing the legal procedure requires the co-signature of the Prime Minister. In the current political and geopolitical situation in which Poland finds itself, starting a discussion on access to weapons is not a bad thing. Less than 1% of Poles have any experience with firearms. I believe that opening such a discussion is fully justified. [Russian Federation at G20] For the first time in history, Poland has been invited to participate in the G20 meetings. President Karol Nawrocki's position towards Putin's Russia is unequivocal and was clearly articulated, among other things, during his speech at the UN forum. #Polska #polityka #cenyPaliw (translated)

Donald Tusk testuje nową formę „podcastowego orędzia”. Zamiast konferencji, mównicy czy kilkunastosekundowej riposty na X - usiadł przy mikrofonie i spokojnie wyjaśnił mechanizm wysokich cen paliw oraz rozwiązanie proponowane przez rząd. Sam materiał szybko przekroczył milion wyświetleń na X. To istotne, bo nośnikiem nie jest KPRM ani konkretna platforma - jest nim premier dysponujący milionowymi zasięgami na różnych platformach. W przypadku paliw było co tłumaczyć. Rząd wiąże wzrost cen z sytuacją na światowych rynkach i zakłóceniami dostaw, a proponowany podatek od nadzwyczajnych zysków firm paliwowych ma przynieść ok. 4 mld zł i finansować działania osłonowe, w tym obniżenie obciążeń podatkowych paliw. Opozycja i otoczenie prezydenta przedstawiają sprawę inaczej - wskazują https://t.co/qPNdq9HYaR. na możliwość obniżenia cen innymi instrumentami i krytykują przerzucanie odpowiedzialności na prezydenta. Podcast daje premierowi przestrzeń, żeby zamiast odpowiadać sloganem na slogan przedstawić obywatelowi cały mechanizm i własne argumenty. Potencjał tego formatu bierze się również ze sposobu działania współczesnych platform. Już wcześniejsze analizy aktywności europejskich liderów na TikToku wskazywały Tuska wśród polityków osiągających bardzo wysokie liczby wyświetleń, a treści “humanizujące” polityków należą do formatów generujących duże zaangażowanie. Jeden kilkuminutowy podcast może jednocześnie być pełnym wyjaśnieniem na YouTube czy X i źródłem kilkunastu krótkich klipów na TikToka, Reels czy Shorts. To potencjalnie viralowe orędzie przystosowane do internetu zamiast telewizji. Jest jeszcze drugi efekt - wizerunkowy. PiS przez dwie dekady konsekwentnie budował negatywny obraz Tuska manipulacjami i zwykłymi kłamstwami. Podcast nie unieważnia tej wieloletniej narracji, ale omija jej filtr. Odbiorca przez kilka minut obserwuje premiera mówiącego własnym głosem, spokojnie i współczesnym językiem medialnym. Dla części obywateli może to być kontakt nie z groźnym wizerunkiem premiera stworzonym przez jego przeciwników, lecz bezpośrednio z Tuskiem jako człowiekiem. Co więcej, Tusk już w exposé w 2023 r. obiecywał comiesięczne otwarte spotkania, podczas których miał zdawać obywatelom raport z tego, co rząd zrobił, co się udało i gdzie pojawiły się problemy. Późniejsza odpowiedź KPRM na interpelację dotyczącą realizacji tej zapowiedzi wskazywała przede wszystkim inne kanały komunikacji rządu, zamiast wykazać realizację cyklu takich comiesięcznych spotkań. Podcast nie zastąpi rozmowy twarzą w twarz i pytań obywateli, ale może realizować część pierwotnej idei znacznie szerzej: regularnie tłumaczyć milionom ludzi decyzje i działania państwa - bez pośredników i zewnętrznej narracji. Z perspektywy walki z dezinformacją najważniejsze jest właśnie połączenie zasięgu z czasem. Fałszywa lub uproszczona narracja może zmieścić się w jednym zdaniu, podczas gdy jej sprostowanie często wymaga pokazania przyczyn, danych i zależności. Premier posiadający własną dużą publiczność może stworzyć stały punkt odniesienia: jeden temat, kilka minut, źródła, decyzja rządu, jej koszty i ograniczenia. Warunek jest jeden - materiał musi pozwalać odbiorcy sprawdzić przedstawiane informacje, bo inaczej podcast stanie się po prostu kolejnym kanałem politycznego przekazu. Wniosek: pojedynczy film jest eksperymentem. Regularny podcast premiera mógłby stać się nowoczesnym odpowiednikiem orędzia - mniej ceremonialnym, bardziej osobistym i zaprojektowanym pod mechanikę mediów społecznościowych. Może również zmieniać sposób, w jaki część obywateli postrzega samego Tuska, bo daje mu możliwość bezpośredniego kontaktu z odbiorcą po latach intensywnego negatywnego przekazu jego przeciwników. To nie gwarantuje zmiany opinii, ale zmienia warunki, w których obywatel ją wyrabia. Ocena Doświadczeń Obywatela: 8/10 ✅ Rekomendacja: jeśli rząd uzna ten format za wartościowy, powinien wdrożyć go konsekwentnie jako regularny kanał informacyjny premiera: jeden aktualny problem, spokojne wyjaśnienie, dane i źródła widoczne na ekranie, wskazanie tego, co rząd zrobił, czego nie zrobił i dlaczego. W kampanii taki format może mieć dużą wartość komunikacyjną, ale z perspektywy państwa jego istotniejszą funkcją byłoby skrócenie dystansu informacyjnego między władzą a obywatelem. — #PolitycznyUX @PolitycznyUX #Polityka #Podcast #Tusk