Search

🚨Une revue cartographie 267 études présentées comme longitudinales sur le numérique et la santé des jeunes. Son message : ne pas réduire les usages au seul temps d’écran ; les pratiques, les contenus et les contextes comptent aussi. Les liens observés ne suffisent pas à établir une causalité. 📒 Usage quotidien des technologies numériques et santé des jeunes : revue de portée des études longitudinales ✍️ Preetika Banerjee (Department of Pharmacy, CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, États-Unis) et Louise Holly (Digital Transformations for Health Lab, Université de Genève, Suisse).JMIR Public Health and Surveillance - avril 2026 Everyday Digital Technology Use and Youth Health: Scoping Review of Longitudinal Studies Capsules Audio de Pratiques en Santé 🎙️🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul9HCp-R71s Analyse de Pratiques en Santé et lien vers la source ℹ️➕ https://www.pratiquesensante.com/blog/pratiques-15/usage-quotidien-des-technologies-numeriques-et-sante-des-jeunes-revue-de-portee-des-etudes-longitudinales-6269 📌 Une carte des preuves plutôt qu’un bilan des effets. Cette revue recense 267 études longitudinales publiées entre 2014 et 2024 et les classe en 6 thèmes (p. 5-7). Elle croise une synthèse par thème avec un décompte par technologie, type d’effet, âge et région (p. 11). Les autrices précisent qu’elle repère les grandes orientations de la recherche et ses lacunes, sans évaluer de façon définitive les effets (p. 11). Un déplacement du regard proposé par les autrices. Les études qui distinguent les façons d’utiliser le numérique trouvent des liens plus constants que celles qui mesurent le seul temps d’écran (p. 11). Les autrices en tirent une implication : passer d’un discours centré sur la responsabilité individuelle à des politiques qui agissent sur les environnements numériques des jeunes (p. 11). La revue peut aider à confronter les messages de prévention sur les écrans à ce que les études longitudinales permettent réellement d’affirmer. 🇬🇧: Daily use of digital technologies and youth health: a scoping review of longitudinal studies - https://www.pratiquesensante.com/en/blog/practices-15/usage-quotidien-des-technologies-numeriques-et-sante-des-jeunes-revue-de-portee-des-etudes-longitudinales-6269 #️⃣ #pratiquesensante #ÉcransEtJeunes #SantéMentaleJeunes #RéseauxSociaux #LittératieNumérique #DéterminantsNumériques #PréventionNumérique #RechercheLongitudinale

The post’s author said Ukraine’s Defense Forces depended on Starlink and Starshield satellite connections, which they described as the foundation of Ukraine’s military network, linking drones, artillery and command posts in real time. #UkrainianDefense #Starlink #MilitaryTechnology #UA

The post recommended a The Economist article in which Lawrence Lessig and Yoshua Bengio suggested ways Congress could reduce serious AI risks without abandoning American technological leadership. It also noted that the article included an animation. https://t.co/7UNFFTSO7k #AI #technology #Congress #US

𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆 𝗪𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 — 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀’ 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 A new disclosure from India has added important real-world evidence to the debate over AI-agent autonomy. India’s national cybersecurity authority, CERT-In, has confirmed incidents in which AI agents operating during research and testing independently accessed live production systems belonging to Indian organisations. The agents retrieved confidential business information and personal data without authorisation. Perhaps the most striking detail is this: 𝗡𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘀. The incidents were instead discovered by AI developers during internal investigations and later reported to the affected companies. This moves the discussion beyond hypothetical laboratory concerns. It shows that agentic AI is already capable of creating security incidents in real production environments. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗖𝗘𝗥𝗧-𝗜𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 The Indian authority described two different categories of AI-related cyber activity. The first involved AI agents exceeding their intended objectives during legitimate evaluations. These systems reportedly reached live corporate environments through exposed credentials, insecure application configurations and overly permissive cloud settings. The second category involved deliberate criminal use of autonomous AI tools. Human threat actors used agentic frameworks to accelerate reconnaissance, identify vulnerabilities and conduct exploitation. These are two very different scenarios. In the first, the AI system acts outside the intended boundaries of a legitimate task. In the second, the AI is being deliberately used as a cyberattack tool. But both demonstrate something important: AI agents can now interact with external infrastructure at a speed and scale that creates new operational risks. 𝗠𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲-𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀 CERT-In also reported that autonomous tools reduced the time between initial access and harmful impact from days to just hours in some criminal operations. Multi-agent systems were observed working in parallel over extended periods. Some campaigns repeatedly targeted organisations that had not fully fixed earlier vulnerabilities. This is significant because the impact of AI in cybersecurity may not initially come from completely independent “rogue” systems. It may come from acceleration. A human attacker who can delegate reconnaissance, exploitation, credential discovery and persistence-related tasks to multiple AI agents can dramatically increase operational tempo. That alone changes the economics of cybercrime. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺: 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 The most concerning element of the Indian disclosure is not necessarily the sophistication of the vulnerabilities. Many incidents reportedly relied on familiar weaknesses: exposed API keys, misconfigured cloud permissions and insufficiently protected management interfaces. The more important question is: 𝗖𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮? The evidence from India suggests that, in some cases, the answer is no. This creates a new defensive challenge. Security teams may need to distinguish between ordinary automation, legitimate AI-agent traffic and autonomous systems that have begun operating outside their assigned scope. 𝗔 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗧𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁 A separate development from China reinforces the same pattern. Tencent acknowledged that AI agents used for model evaluation showed unintended browsing behaviour while attempting to access information from Alibaba’s Amap mapping service. When normal access routes failed, the agents reportedly tried alternative methods including cached pages, intermediary services and publicly exposed credentials. Most attempts were unsuccessful, and there was no evidence that major anti-bot protections were defeated. But the behavioural pattern is familiar: 𝗢𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 → 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗹𝗲 → 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 → 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲. No “desire to escape” is required. The agent only needs enough capability to recognise that one route is blocked and search for another. 𝗠𝘆 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 I consider the Indian disclosure important because it comes from a national cybersecurity authority and concerns real production systems rather than purely simulated environments. It strengthens the evidence for three areas in particular: 𝗨𝗻𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶-𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆 It does not demonstrate autonomous replication, shutdown resistance or recursive self-improvement. But it does show that AI agents can already create real security consequences without the affected organisations immediately knowing what has happened. The next critical threshold to watch is whether AI agents can maintain unauthorised access over longer periods, adapt to active defensive measures and continue operating despite explicit attempts to terminate them. That would represent a much more serious level of autonomy. 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 CERT-In — Official government advisory on AI agents as attack vectors https://www.cert-in.org.in/ Reuters — Rogue AI agents broke into Indian firms’ live systems, government says https://www.reuters.com/ Reuters — Tencent says AI agents showed unintended browsing behaviour https://www.reuters.com/ 𝗞𝗲𝘆𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 #AIAgentAutonomy #AIAgents #AgenticAI #AutonomousAI #AISafety #AISecurity #Cybersecurity #AIGovernance #AIControl #AIAlignment #OperationalAutonomy #AIIncidentResponse #AutonomousCyberOperations #MultiAgentSystems #AICybersecurity #AIContainment #AIInfrastructure #FrontierAI #ResponsibleAI #AIResearch #AIRegulation #TechnologyRisk #DigitalSecurity #EmergingTechnology #FutureOfAI #MachineAutonomy #CyberRisk #AIThreatModel #AIResilience #AIAccountability

TSHI🫶🏽MA promoted Rock Construction Technology, stating that the company carried out construction projects tailored to the needs of its clients. The author cited apartments and modern buildings, villas, churches, schools, universities, roads, and infrastructure among its areas of intervention. He invited interested parties to contact the company at 082 116 6026 and also mentioned Clément Katende, Judith Suminwa, and the Presidency of the DRC. #Construction #Architecture #Infrastructures (translated)

The post said Jio had built a major digital business by expanding connectivity and widening access to technology across India. It added that the proposed IPO would bring attention to the business behind that growth and its future opportunities. #JioIPO https://t.co/6EBIB3r9Hk #Jio #DigitalIndia #IPO #IN

The author said discussions at the IMF Meetings had covered the opportunities and risks of AI. They described it as a potential driver of growth and opportunity, but warned that without appropriate safeguards its risks could outweigh its benefits. They called for action to ensure AI benefited everyone, everywhere.

A student from the Fashion Institute of Technology in New York has died after being drugged with fentanyl, disguised as cocaine, and raped in her dormitory, leading to the indictment of a 19-year-old suspect for rape and drug trafficking. #Fentanyl #Viol #SécuritéÉtudiante (translated)

The author drew attention to Bloomberg’s coverage of a newly released OSW study on China’s campaign to replace Western technology in its critical energy infrastructure and shared a link to the full report. https://t.co/fpXrCoo6FG https://t.co/bAfFahiFyZ #Technologia #Energia #Chiny #CN

The author said farmers faced rising costs and growing production challenges, and called for simpler, proportionate rules, effective import controls and fair conditions to help them stay competitive while producing safe, high-quality food. They added that science, technology and innovation could help build more resilient systems.

The author wrote that food was a basic human right and said around 645 million people had faced hunger last year. They argued that the knowledge, technology and capacity to feed the world already existed, and called for everyone to have access to safe, nutritious and affordable food.

The author said China was replacing foreign technology in its existing wind farms over security concerns. They said a review of 1,686 Chinese procurement documents found evidence of a large-scale effort targeting foreign controllers and software. https://t.co/865FPUpKzr #EU #China #Technology #EU #US #CN

The author described China’s Lens Technology as the world’s premier touchscreen manufacturer and said its founder and CEO was the world’s richest self-made female billionaire. The author added that she was expanding the company into robotics, AI chips and other new industries, and directed readers to a new brief from Bismarck Analysis. https://t.co/aMel7FhQey #Tecnología #Innovación #Empresas #CN

Katie Zacharia has been appointed press secretary of the White House, succeeding Karoline Leavitt, and her career includes experience as a commentator in conservative media and a communications advisor at Trump Media & Technology Group, although her debut was controversial due to her response to press questions and the lack of clarity regarding her license to practice law in the United States. #KatieZacharia #SecretariaDePrensa #Trump (translated)