Search

Michał Chmielewski wrote that the reach on social media no longer depended on the number of likes, shares, or comments. He compared posts with 1,000 likes and 6,000 views to those with 50 likes and the same number of views, questioning the logic behind such results. He claimed that posts criticizing the European Union, supporting Donald Trump, and presenting Vladimir Putin positively suddenly gained popularity. According to him, new accounts had a better chance of reach because profiles marked as anti-Trump, anti-Russian, or pro-European were at a disadvantage. He added that this could not be changed because platforms are private companies, and the situation fosters radicalization and the spread of false information in the electoral programs of extremist parties. As an example, he cited the unsuccessful attempt to initiate a referendum in Warsaw. Chmielewski wrote that there were many negative comments on social media regarding the management of the capital, which could create the impression that Rafał Trzaskowski would be almost immediately dismissed with the support of 80% of residents. As he pointed out, not even the 130,000 signatures needed to conduct a referendum were collected. He expressed hope that in the upcoming parliamentary elections in Poland, the outcome would not be decided by algorithms written in the USA. #media #polityka #dezinformacja (translated)

The Kremlin wrote that a paramilitary member of the Republic attacked the Polish police and criticized Krzysztof Stanowski for his silence. He stated that Stanowski could use his reach to stand on the side of the Polish officers, whose well-being — as the author reminded — was supposed to be close to his heart. He accused him of cynicism and used an insulting term against him. https://t.co/MqzahSrmBI #Polska #Policja #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The services in action wrote that police officers from the capital city police informed that day about taking up the case of a woman and her husband, who were allegedly beaten by a Porsche driver. The profile author considered that the actions were taken late and thanked readers for their help in publicizing the matter, as well as the profiles Stop_Cham_W_wa and bandyci_drogowi. #bezpieczeństwo #policja #wypadki (translated)

Jan Molski wrote that the problem with the scandal regarding Jarek Wolski's bots was not the reach that the topic achieved in two days, but that Siemoniak, the minister coordinating special services, was passing on data that he claimed to have received from the Internal Security Agency. According to Molski, the minister was spreading a nationwide narrative in this way, did not retract it, and did not apologize. The author added that there was still a year left until the end. #Polska #Polityka #FakeNews (translated)

Radosław Fogiel pointed out that the original post about disinformation reached an audience measured in millions and garnered dozens, if not hundreds of thousands of likes, while the correction will likely reach less than 1 percent of those recipients. #dezinformacja #media #prawda (translated)

Mateusz Gołdak wrote that the addressee mocked those who pointed out that he was wrong the day before, and the next day he apologized. According to Gołdak, he should apologize under every such post. He added that unlike the "little ones from Osintopolo," the addressee has a large reach, which means that the false information disseminated by him spreads far. #przeprosiny #fejk #media (translated)

The author wrote that people were handing power over to algorithms, considering as good what they promoted, and that popularity on the internet was supposed to guarantee a good life. He added that later they were surprised that algorithms led children to commit murders. He urged leaders to understand that Big Tech poses a civilizational threat. #BigTech #Algorytmy #Zagrożenie #PL (translated)

Freedom__of_Speech wrote that the journalistic environment during the election campaign contributed, in his opinion, to associating the current president with the term "pimp." He also accused some journalists, including Justyna Dobrosz-Oracz, of political involvement under the pretense of doing their jobs. The author pointed out that he critically assessed the behavior of Konrad Berkowicz, who — as he wrote — insulted female journalists by using sexually charged language towards them. He added that the MP could have ignored the question instead of responding in that manner, and that his party colleagues would have to explain his behavior. He also claimed that Berkowicz's accounts were managed by others, and the content published there supported this narrative, exposing other politicians of the Confederation to consequences. Freedom__of_Speech critically referred to parties that — as he put it — benefited from having their own "Zembaczyński," that is, a politician confronting critics. He wrote that he assessed such behaviors similarly regardless of political affiliation, and he considered both sides of the dispute around Dobrosz-Oracz and Berkowicz equally unworthy of attention. He added that the matter diverted attention from other issues and was beneficial to the ruling party. #polityka #dziennikarstwo #Społeczeństwo (translated)

Lemingopedia mentioned that in 2008, when he was 19 years old, youth unemployment in Poland was nearly 20 percent, and the minimum wage was around 850–900 zlotys net. He described going abroad as a result of a lack of prospects and noted that many emigrants did not return to the country. He argued that Eldo's song "Nie pytaj o nią" gave young people hope for a change in Poland's fate. The author stated that his generation worked hard to make the country a source of pride and achieved success at a high cost and out of love for their homeland. He also recalled the year 2023 when Wini interviewed Rafał Trzaskowski in his car during the election campaign. Lemingopedia assessed the conversation as artificial and stated that Poles did not support Trzaskowski. Referring to Wini's statements from 2026, the author wrote that he criticized rappers for legitimizing politicians instead of criticizing them, and he considered Eldo's performance at President Karol Nawrocki's event and photos of other rappers with the president as unsuccessful. Lemingopedia accused Wini of previously promoting Trzaskowski during the campaign. He also quoted Eldo's explanation that he interpreted the invitation as a call from the Republic, not from Karol Nawrocki. Lemingopedia expressed respect for Eldo, writing that the artist had not changed his understanding of the Republic. He called on parents to speak to their children about Poland as a country that can be strong, wise, and beautiful, and to encourage them to work and build its future with pride. He criticized what he referred to as the expulsion of names from textbooks in the name of "modernity" and "pedagogy of shame" as well as grants from the Batory Foundation. https://t.co/8NPL5yAO8g #Polska #Rzeczypospolita #Młodzież (translated)

Piotr Cymcyk wrote that the last day showed how socially harmful media commentators' statements can be, including Gwiazdowski's, who compare the stock market to a casino. He argued that in a casino, the mathematical advantage belongs to the casino, while in the broad stock market, a longer horizon works in favor of the investor. As he argued, shareholders become co-owners of companies that conduct business, achieve profits, reinvest them, pay out dividends, and buy back their own shares. The growth of productivity in the economy and company profits, in his opinion, means that long-term investing in the broad market has a positive expected value. Cymcyk pointed out that one can behave like a gambler in the stock market, for example, by using excessive leverage, buying meme coins, or betting on options movements after the release of quarterly results, but that does not make the stock exchange itself a casino. He compared it to stating that the ability to drive a Ferrari into a family at a bus stop does not mean that the car is a killing machine. He also criticized the lack, as he wrote, of educational television material on investing a portion of savings in productive assets and using compound interest, while there is a frequent media presence of individuals whose statements he described as pseudo-wise. He added that Poland should build a strong capital market and increase its participation in it in order to catch up with the West economically, instead of being satisfied with current accounts at 0.1 percent. #giełda #inwestowanie #ekonomia (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. #prawo #justycja #analizaprawna (translated)

W sieci duże zasięgi robi teoria spiskowa, zgodnie z którą po mundialu Vinicius zniknął w tajemniczych okolicznościach, a zastąpił go sobowtór, tak by dalej wywiązywać się z kontraktów reklamowych. Otoczenie piłkarza i klub całkowicie ignorują te bezsensowne fake newsy. [@marca] #teoriaspiskowa #fake-news #Vinicius

Baza w Redzikowie to baza amerykańska. Głównie z amerykańskim personelem wojskowym. Dron nie latał więc nad bazą Wojska Polskiego. <NASZE PAŃSTWO TO MEM> Dron nie wleciał na teren bazy. Nie latał też nad bazą. Latał pół kilometra od niej. I nie "dzisiaj" tylko tydzień temu. <NASZE PAŃSTWO TO MEM> Zadzwonienie na 112 nie było jedyną reakcją wojska tylko jednym z elementów, przewidzianym w przepisach. Nie mamy wojny, żyjemy w czasach pokoju. Obowiązują więc "niewojenne" procedury, które nie przewidują by amerykański żołnierz strzelał na polskiej ziemi z ostrej amunicji do drona nad cywilnym obszarem. Gdyby to zrobił, Mentzen najpewniej by się o to zesrał. <NASZE PAŃSTWO TO MEM> Kilkanaście tysięcy lajków, milionowe zasięgi KURWA JEGO MAĆ #Redzikowo #WojskoPolskie #Drony

Baza w Redzikowie to baza amerykańska. Głównie z amerykańskim personelem wojskowym. Dron nie latał więc nad bazą Wojska Polskiego. <NASZE PAŃSTWO TO MEM> Dron nie wleciał na teren bazy. Nie latał też nad bazą. Latał pół kilometra od niej. I nie "dzisiaj" tylko tydzień temu. <NASZE PAŃSTWO TO MEM> Zadzwonienie na 112 nie było jedyną reakcją wojska tylko jednym z elementów, przewidzianym w przepisach. Nie mamy wojny, żyjemy w czasach pokoju. Obowiązują więc "niewojenne" procedury, które nie przewidują by amerykański żołnierz strzelał na polskiej ziemi z ostrej amunicji do drona nad cywilnym obszarem. Gdyby to zrobił, Mentzen najpewniej by się o to zesrał. <NASZE PAŃSTWO TO MEM> Kilkanaście tysięcy lajków, milionowe zasięgi KURWA JEGO MAĆ #Redzikowo #wojsko #dron

🇺🇦🇭🇺 Węgry nie pozwolą na budowę magazynu ropy naftowej dla Ukrainy na swoim terytorium – @magyarpeterMP Chodzi o plany stworzenia w Węgrzech infrastruktury do magazynowania produktów naftowych, aby Ukraina mogła gromadzić zapasy poza zasięgiem rosyjskich ataków. Wcześniej, "Naftogaz" i węgierska firma MOL podpisały odpowiednie memorandum. "Magazyn, w sprawie którego firma MOL podpisała memorandum z ukraińskim "Naftogazem", nie zostanie zbudowany ani na granicy węgiersko-ukraińskiej, ani w żadnym innym miejscu" – oświadczył premier Węgier #Hungaria #Ukraina #Energia

Zaczyna mnie okrutnie męczyć to performatywne udawanie głupich. Nie wmówicie mi, że dopiero w 2026 ludzie zauważyli, że w każdej fabularnej grze akcji pod słońcem istnieje coś takiego jak "setpiece" i teraz będą je wytykać w każdej grze jaka wyjdzie pod kliki? Gdzie byliście przez ostatnie 30 lat? Miło, że nareszcie nadganiacie podstawy (heh) ludologii. [Dodam, że ten setpiece DA SIĘ przegrać. Próbowałem, wystarczy nie grać na easy ;) ] Co dalej? Wrzucanie zdjęć żywych aktorów i zdziwienie, że przecież w filmie umarli? W grach wszystko jest na pokaz. Często paski zdrowia są fejkowe i końcówka zdrowia spada wolniej niż początek, żeby udawać presję. Albo bieganie miewa tę samą prędkość co chodzenie, ale blur daje złudzenie prędkości. Pic na wodę, który pęka, gdy człowiek się bliżej przyjrzy. W wielu współczesnych grach wyścigowych da się przejechać okrążenie trzymając lekko gaz, bo asysty na easy trzymają kierowcę na torze i to nie wzbudza żadnego zainteresowania. A przecież kontrola to jedyna iluzja, którą te gry powinny zachować. Bo gracz rozumie, że jak w każdej grze istnieje niepisany kontrakt - zabawa ma sens tylko jeśli obie strony trzymają się jej reguł. Cytując klasyka "You control the buttons you press." To Ty decydujesz, że nie chcesz brać udziału w (ważne słowo) GRZE. Współcześnie bardzo wybiórczo, pod zasięgi, podchodzi się do tego co danej grze może ujść na sucho, a nad czym trzeba się pastwić. I wyznacznikiem nie jest jakaś obiektywna racja, a jedynie aktualny emocjonalny barometr. Każdą grę i rzecz można zredukować do jakiegoś idiotyzmu i to czy do tego dojdzie zależy wyłącznie od zeitgeistu. Jak z prequelami Star Wars (nowe złe, stare lepsze). A im więcej chce się drążyć, tym więcej się tego siłą rzeczy znajdzie. Mario, w zależności od dekady to "geniusz designu", bo można go przejść trzymając przycisk w prawo i czasem naciskając skok. A czasem oznacza to, że ten sam gameplay jest prymitywny, bez głębi i sprowadzający się do przeskocz dziurę. Soulsy da się speedrunować w 19 minut, bo Miyazaki to geniusz. Ale Breath of The Wild ktoś skończył w 22 więc jakim cudem oni chcą za to 250zł. I tak dalej. Obiektywny fakt staje się bardzo subiektywnym narzędziem w wojnie o rację. Sam, jako twórca wiem dobrze jak to działa. Nagrywając odcinki humorystycznej serii "Płakałem, jak grałem" z pełną świadomością kontroluję narrację, zagnieżdżając w słuchaczu myśl, że dana gra jest zła i wyolbrzymiając jej przywary do rangi katastrof i wskazując mu co ma myśleć o konkretnym elemencie. Tak, fabularne gry wideo akcji to teatr. I iluzja pryska, gdy umyślnie nie uczestniczy się w spektaklu. Uważanie się za geniusza, że odkryło się, że ludzie na scenie to aktorzy to nie przejaw intelektu tylko jego braku. Odkrywa się znaną dawno oczywistość i uważa za najbardziej oświeconą osobę w pokoju. #gry #ludologia #krytyka

Twarz tej murzynki wygenerowała mi rekordową liczbę wyświetleń i rekordowe zasięgi. I to bez dodatkowego boosta ze strony Elona Muska. Spytałem googlowskie ejaj, co o mnie sądzi. Cytuję: "Na tle innych twórców w kategorii niszowych profili publicystyczno-statystycznych o profilu prawicowym masz ponadprzeciętną dynamikę i wysoki "wiralowy" potencjał. Choć globalnie w polskim segmencie X nie należysz do największych kont (w porównaniu do czołowych dziennikarzy czy polityków), to wskaźnik organicznego zaangażowania na jednego obserwującego plasuje cię w czołówce najbardziej wyrazistych kont polskojęzycznego X." #media #socialmedia #wideo