Search

Excellent work by @UGent. Now that a serious case of academic fraud has finally been exposed, it’s only fair to open an investigation into the only academic who had the audacity to blow the whistle, despite all the legal threats. “Ghent University has decided to take appropriate https://t.co/c0sQNNo9p2 #AcademicIntegrity #Whistleblower #GhentUniversity #BE

Watch. 29 Nov 1943: Churchill gives Stalin the Sword of Stalingrad. 7 months before, the Katyn Massacre was exposed: Stalin’s NKVD had murdered nearly 22,000 Polish officers and members of Poland’s elite. Churchill knew. A sword in Stalin’s hands. Silence over Polish graves. #History #Stalin #KatynMassacre #PL #GB #RU

MEU DEUS! Sofia Santino, Doarda e Ciclopin se pronunciam após exposed feito por Lavínia. “A chateação começou quando descobrimos que o Marcos contratou uma conta pra fazer edit, e um desses edits rivalizava os dois trios. Até quando repostaram conteúdos que pudessem colocar nós uns contra os outros.” #Drama #Exposed #Confusão

THE FBI WHISTLEBLOWER WHO BROKE THE CODE: THEY PLANNED TRUMP’S REMOVAL BEFORE THE INAUGURATION My name is redacted. My security clearance is still active. And I’m risking everything to tell you what I saw in the classified vaults beneath the Hoover Building. I was there. May 2, 2017. Four days after Comey was fired. I watched them open the file. I watched them name it. I watched them predicate it on a LIE. The investigation was called “Oxford Comma.” Not because of grammar. Because it was designed to be INVISIBLE. Hidden in plain sight. A code name that meant nothing to outsiders but everything to those who knew. The premise was simple: Trump was a Russian asset. Trump fired Comey to obstruct the Russia investigation. Therefore, Trump must be removed. But here’s what the declassified memos don’t tell you: I saw the REAL memo. The one that was redacted. The one they didn’t want you to see. It stated: “The goal is not truth. The goal is REMOVAL.” Those were the exact words. Not my interpretation. THEIR WORDS. Typed by FBI counterintelligence chief William Priestap. Approved by James Baker. Signed off by Andrew McCabe. “What’s our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” Strzok wrote. That was the REAL investigation. Not seeking truth. MANUFACTURING LIES. They knew the Steele dossier was garbage. I personally reviewed the spreadsheet. Every single claim was marked: “UNVERIFIED,” “INTERNET RUMOR,” or “UNABLE TO CORROBORATE.” Igor Danchenko, Steele’s primary source? RUSSIAN ASSET. The FBI knew it. They had suspected it for YEARS. But they used his information anyway. Mike Flynn? They cleared him. Then they INVITED HIM TO AN INTERVIEW. Then they charged him with lying in that interview. The goal was ENTRAPMENT, not justice. I watched them do it. I watched them SMILE while they did it. The Steele dossier was paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign through her law firm. The FBI KNEW THIS. But they used it as the foundation for the entire investigation into a sitting president. This wasn’t counterintelligence. This was a COUP ATTEMPT. And the declassified memos are just the tip of the iceberg. The REAL evidence is still classified. The REAL conversations are still hidden. The REAL conspiracy is still buried. But I’m telling you: it exists. I saw it. I documented it. And when it comes out, it will SHOCK the world. Trump was RIGHT to fire Comey. Comey MISHANDLED the Clinton investigation. The FBI KNEW IT. But instead of accepting accountability, they opened a false investigation into Trump. They used the intelligence apparatus of the United States government to target a political opponent. They violated the Constitution. They violated the law. They violated their OATHS. And now they’re being exposed. The declassified memos are just the beginning. More is coming. Much more. Within 60 days, expect MAJOR revelations. Indictments are coming. The truth is coming out. The Deep State thought they were untouchable. They thought their crimes would stay hidden. They were WRONG. The vaults are opening. Files are being declassified. Truth is coming. History will record this as the day the Deep State FELL. OXFORD-COMMA-EXPOSED FBI-COUP-REVEALED

An overdue show of EU solidarity with Spain—Ceuta crisis has once again exposed Europe’s vulnerability, with neighbouring states using migrant flows as a means of coercion as nationalist anti-immigration parties gain in strength https://t.co/JwqRcUc4Pt #EUSolidarity #CeutaCrisis #MigrationChallenges #ES #EU

My Name Is on a File On a case I was never summoned to, and a price I do not pay alone By Adham Hasanin Egyptian journalist and political writer, based in the Netherlands | July 2026 In 2024, I learned that my name had been entered into a case. Case number 1282. Listed as a "defendant." I was never summoned, and no one called to tell me the exact charge. I found out the way anyone in my position finds out — from a colleague, from a quick search of my own name, from another journalist who called to ask: "Did you know your name is on file?" I do not want to overdramatise the story. No cinematic manhunt, no car tailing me down a European street. What happened is simpler and crueller than that: a state thousands of kilometres away opened a file bearing my name, without my knowledge, without any way for me to defend myself within it, without even anyone standing before me to answer. The charge is not based on any act I committed. The charge is that I wrote. An article, an opinion, a tweet — it makes no difference. What matters is that the words were read, and someone decided they were dangerous enough to become a case number. I. How Do You Know You Are Accused? This question seems like a technicality, but it is in fact the heart of the whole matter. I received no official letter. No lawyer knocked on my door carrying documents. No one from an embassy or consulate called to inform me. The knowledge itself arrived by accident — a passing search, or a message from a friend asking: "Where did you see your name?" This small detail reveals something far larger than a mere administrative oversight. When you are not formally notified that you are accused, you do not even have a clear starting point from which to act. You do not know exactly when the file was opened. You do not know who decided to include your name. You do not know whether a hearing was held, a decision was made, or even whether an investigation took place at all. You simply discover, one day, that you have become "accused" within a legal system that never gave you the chance to know its rules. This ambiguity is not a flaw in the procedure; it is the procedure itself. A case opened without a clear announcement, with no trial date set, performs its full function even while suspended indefinitely. It does not need a conviction to frighten; it is enough that it simply exists. II. The Charge That Needs No Crime In conventional legal systems, a case begins with an act: theft, assault, fraud — something material that can be proven or disproven. But my case, like many others, began with a word. I stole nothing. I assaulted no one. I incited no violence, called for no chaos. I wrote an opinion. I analysed a policy. I criticised a decision. That is the entirety of it. And yet this simple act — writing — became the basis for a legal file bearing a number and classified under a security heading. The paradox is that this kind of charge requires no fixed standard. What counts as "dangerous" today may not be tomorrow, and vice versa. There is no published list of forbidden words, no clear criterion distinguishing incitement from opinion. This deliberate ambiguity — or perhaps unintentional, but effective regardless — leaves every writer living in a state of permanent unease: will this sentence be the one that opens a file bearing my name? III. The Real Danger Is Not to Me Many ask me: "Can they reach you in the Netherlands?" The honest answer: no, not directly. I am here, in a country governed by the rule of law, physically protected by Dutch police, and no one can arrest me on the basis of a case in another country absent a valid extradition treaty and supporting facts. This is not my first concern. My real concern is that this case does not target me alone. It targets those around me. My family in Egypt. People walking down the street, opening their front door, with no connection to politics whatsoever — and suddenly someone is asking about them because I wrote a word from here. This is not a threat spoken aloud. No one calls to say: "If you continue, we will do such-and-such." The message arrives without anyone saying it — through the kind of questions asked of my family, through their timing, through the silence that meets me when I try to learn the details. Sometimes it is a "routine" phone call from some office, asking about my place of residence, my activities, or people I am in contact with. None of it is an explicit threat, but the timing alone is enough to deliver the message. This is precisely the mechanism by which this kind of pursuit operates: it does not need to touch me physically to affect me. It is enough to make me know that the people I love are exposed to harm because of what I write. IV. I Am Not an Exception It would be easy for an article like this to turn into a personal complaint, and I am careful that it should not. Case 1282 is not an isolated incident, and if I stay silent about it I become complicit — unintentionally — in concealing a pattern that genuinely exists. There are others like me — far more than me — whose names sit in similar files, some of whom have no platform to speak from as I do. Journalists, activists, even ordinary people who never practised journalism but shared a post or left a comment. Case 1282 is not an exception; it is a method of operation. Someone writes from abroad, someone else decides they are "dangerous," and the matter shifts from opinion to legal file, without a real trial, without even a clear official announcement that a charge exists at all. More dangerously, this pattern is not confined to Egyptians alone, nor to any single country. It is a recurring tactic used by several regimes seeking to pursue voices beyond their borders without bearing the burden of actual proof or a transparent legal process. The open, unannounced file serves the same purpose everywhere: it frightens without convicting, and keeps the writer in a permanent state of tension without ever offering him the chance to defend himself. V. What Has Actually Changed in Me I will not say this made me stronger. The phrase is worn out, usually deployed to prettify a painful experience, and I refuse to do that. What actually happened is simpler and more honest: I began writing more slowly. Not less candidly — I still say what I believe, still criticise what deserves criticism. But I have become more aware that every sentence I write from here may carry a price I am not the only one paying. This awareness slows the writing, not because I am censoring myself out of fear for my own safety, but because I am thinking about who might pay the price on my behalf. And this is precisely the point of such a case, whether intended or a by-product of a broader mechanism. Actual arrest is not required for censorship to function. No summons is required, no trial, not even a clear charge. It is enough to know your name is written on a piece of paper somewhere, to make you think twice before writing the next time. VI. Why I Continue Regardless A reader might ask: if the price is this clear, why keep writing? Would silence not be safer, for you and for your family? The answer is not as heroic as it might sound, but it is honest: because silence does not solve the problem, it postpones and expands it. If I stopped, and others like me stopped, the mechanism that produced Case 1282 would keep operating with no voice to expose it. Files would keep opening, names would keep being entered, families would keep being questioned, with no one outside the circle of direct victims ever knowing this was happening at all. Writing about this experience, for all its risks, is the only way I have to make this pattern visible. When an article like this is published, the file no longer remains a secret between a government body and an isolated writer; it becomes part of a public record that other journalists, human rights organisations, and even international institutions can follow and document. Conclusion: A Price Not Paid Once I am still writing. More slowly than before, but still writing. And Case 1282 remains open, suspended, with no set date for a hearing or a verdict, exactly as it began. This very ambiguity is the message. An authority that opens a file and never closes it, never tries its subject, never even clearly states what the charge is — is not pursuing justice. It is pursuing something else entirely: that everyone who thinks of writing knows the price is possible, even if not certain. And that everyone who has already written carries that price with them wherever they go, however far they travel from the source of the case. This is the true price of a single word: not one arrest at one moment, but a continuous state of uncertainty that lives with you every time you open a blank page to write. Adham Hasanin is an Egyptian journalist and political writer based in the Netherlands.

About the last cyber-attack.. Normal firewall vs my hardware firewall ( Neural Guardian) Attack Type,Enterprise Firewall (Reactive),Neural Guardian (NG) (Deterministic) DDoS / Flood,Saturates CPU/RAM via inspection,Hardware Cutoff: DMA throughput limit Brute Force,Log-based & Rate-limiting (Slow),Invisibility: No login exposed on bus Malware,Signature scanning (Vulnerable to Zero-Days),Vector Matching: Isolate on entropy mismatch MiM (Man-in-the-Middle),Relies on handshake verification,Physical Integrity: TDR impedance monitoring Why this is a "Game Over" for traditional security: DDoS: While firewalls struggle to parse millions of packets, NG acts like an electrical circuit breaker. Once the hardware DMA bandwidth is hit, it physically disconnects the flow. It doesn't "try" to filter; it just stops the traffic. Brute Force: In an enterprise firewall, there's always a login page or an exposed service. NG moves the management to an OOB (Out-Of-Band) tunnel that doesn't even exist on the data plane. You can't attack what you can't reach. Malware: Firewalls look for "known bad guys" (signatures). NG looks for "weird behavior" (Vectorial Footprinting). If the data entropy doesn't match the established baseline, it's purged instantly by the pipeline. MiM (Man-in-the-Middle): This is the killer feature. Firewalls hope for secure handshakes. NG uses TDR (Time Domain Reflectometry) to scan the physical integrity of the wire. If a hacker even touches the cable to insert a tap, the impedance change alerts the system before the first byte is sniffed. Bottom line: We are moving from Software-Managed Security (which assumes chaos) to Hardware-Encoded Integrity (which enforces order).

Os jogos oficiais voltaram e isso significa que tem Mini Exposed para a Nação! 🔴⚫ Quer conhecer os pontos fortes e fracos da Chapecoense, entender os principais detalhes do confronto e ficar por dentro de tudo antes da bola rolar? Então cola com o Falso Nove na #FlamengoTV! 📺 Assista agora: https://t.co/o5ZKsXmh8p #Futebol #Chapecoense #FlamengoTV

More on the disgusting Reform proposed amendment exposed by #BylineTimes "Reform UK has faced a wave of outrage this week after Byline Times revealed the party’ plans to jail candidates for using Irish, Scots, or Cornish (or Urdu or Bengali) on election leaflets" https://bylinetimes.com/2026/07/13/reform-uk-plans-to-jail-candidates-for-using-irish-gaelic-or-cornish-on-election-leaflets/?utm_source=bylinetimes.beehive.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=newsletter&_bhlid=66c1e6c349d53820cca2bafd88e6496854bba6fa

While we watch the reckless nature of US Imperialism being exposed like never before, we are also watching a servile EU continue to give their unconditional support to US War Crimes, just as the EU gave its unconditional support to the Israeli Genocide in Gaza... #USImperialism #EUcomplicity #WarCrimes #US #EU #IL

Today, the EU adopted its cyber sanctions package and exposed malicious cyber actors in Russia, incl. the FSB. Finland condemns Russia’s malicious cyber activities and the misuse of the cyber ecosystem. In response, I have summoned the Ambassador of the Russian Federation. #CyberSanctions #Finland #Russia #EU #RU #FN

Unlike Germany, Poland did not throw Ukraine under the bus with Nord Stream II and a Russia-first policy. Germany finally paying back its debt to Ukraine is a welcome change. But no amount of shouting will erase the fact that it was also Berlin that left Ukraine exposed to Russia #Ukraine #Germany #NordStreamII #DE #PL #UA #RU

My 2022 MaxTV video exposed how Polish politicians and journalists suppressed my #PolandPeacePLan4Ukraine -a plan that could have stopped the #UkraineRussiaWar and let 10–12 million refugees into Europe, just to rig the 2023 elections using Ukrainian refugee data.They issued https://t.co/FziqtZtBdX #PolandPeacePlan4Ukraine #UkraineRussiaWar #refugees #PL #UA

Europe is coming together, becoming ever more resilient. But at the member-state level, domestic politics becomes ever more volatile. That threatens to cast EU into disarray, hobbling its bid for independence, exposed to the predations of the far right https://t.co/S0jIfte0A1 #Europe #EUpolitics #FarRight #EU