Search

Citizen Media estimated that French media gave little voice to moderate and non-partisan citizens, in favor of people with stronger opinions, activists, and associative spokespersons. According to the media, this selection, particularly in televised news, street interviews, and studio debates, distorted the representation of opinions and concerns of the French people. Citizen Media added that this invisibilization marginalized individuals committed to dialogue and pragmatism. It claimed that it impoverished democratic debate, fueled distrust towards the media, and gave the impression that society was divided into irreconcilable camps. #Médias #OpinionPublique #Démocratie (translated)

In the video, the first episode of a series of reports by Le Soir explores Binyamin Netanyahu's legacy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through Jerusalem, a central symbol of the tension between Israelis and Palestinians. #Jérusalem #Israël #ConflitIsraéloPalestinien (translated)

Vincent Lapierre stated that the exercise was more difficult than his critics on X thought. He mentioned a constant threat of violence and a strong reaction to a simple joke, which he believed forced him to proceed with caution. He also described the time needed to respond to what he considered fallacious arguments as considerable. According to him, Elwan did not address his comments on the differences between the RN and fascism, the resources allocated to suburb plans, the situation of suburban residents, the generosity of the French social system, or racial profiling, for which Lapierre claimed to rely on a study. He accused Elwan of staying in the rhetoric and bouncing from one topic to another. Lapierre clarified that he was not seeking to win the debate, but to gather testimonies without being attacked and to allow the audience to form their own opinion. He distinguished reporting from debating and claimed to be, to his knowledge, the only one who had given these high school students a voice without provoking confrontation. He believed that this tact explained why his reports were viewed beyond the right-wing Internet sphere. #Débat #Journalisme #Témoin (translated)

The author wrote that Anna Politkovskaya, a journalist assassinated in Moscow in 2006, had understood before others the nature of Vladimir Putin's regime. He asserted that the Russian reporter had regularly alerted about the leader and that her reports in Chechnya had already had a prophetic significance. #Poutine #Journalisme #Tchétchénie #RU #CH #FR (translated)

According to Newsguard, Russian disinformation has seen an alarming increase of 850% in one year, with more than 420 false reports in 2026, primarily targeting European and French media, aimed at polarizing debates on sensitive topics such as the 2027 French presidential election. #Désinformation #Médias #FakeNews (translated)

Storm-1516 – Russia’s information war arrives early in France’s 2027 election France will not elect its next president until April 2027, but the information operations surrounding the campaign have already begun. In late July and August 2026, fabricated stories targeted several prominent figures associated with the presidential race, including Raphaël Glucksmann, Gabriel Attal and former prime minister Édouard Philippe. The methods included fake news websites copying established French media, impersonated journalists, AI-generated voices and manipulated video. French authorities identified the Russian operation known as Storm-1516 behind several of these campaigns. Other attacks were linked to Matryoshka, another Russia-aligned influence network. The timing is significant. Storm-1516 began targeting the French presidential environment roughly nine months before the first round, scheduled for 18 April 2027. Rather than a single disinformation campaign, the activity demonstrates how Russian influence networks can establish narratives and infrastructure long before an election reaches its decisive phase. A fake scandal targeting Raphaël Glucksmann One of the clearest examples appeared at the end of July. A website impersonating the French independent outlet Blast published a fabricated investigation claiming that journalist Léa Salamé had attempted to bribe media organisations in exchange for favourable coverage of her partner, Raphaël Glucksmann. The operation went beyond copying the appearance of a legitimate news site. The identities of real journalists were appropriated and a manipulated video used an AI-generated imitation of the voice of Edwy Plenel, founder of Mediapart, supposedly confirming the allegations. The accusation was false. On 4 August, Glucksmann said France's General Secretariat for Defence and National Security, the SGDSN, had informed him that he had been targeted by Storm-1516. Two days later, the Paris prosecutor's office opened an investigation into suspected Russian interference. The importance of the operation was not the quality of one particular deepfake but the construction of several mutually reinforcing elements: a fake media organisation, impersonated journalists, synthetic audio and social-media accounts distributing the material. Together they created the impression that the allegation had been independently corroborated. Different candidates, overlapping Russian networks Édouard Philippe was also targeted by fabricated stories claiming that he suffered from dementia and was medically incapable of running for president. VIGINUM attributed the operation to Storm-1516. Gabriel Attal faced another wave of false content, including fabricated stories mimicking the identities of French outlets such as RFI, BFM TV, France 24, AFP, Le Parisien, Libération and Le Monde. Some claimed that Attal had symptoms of Parkinson's disease or links to drug trafficking. Attribution here is more complicated. French reporting connected at least part of the campaign against Attal to Matryoshka, rather than Storm-1516. A later digitally manipulated video, apparently associated with Storm-1516, used genuine LCI footage from an August debate but added a white earpiece to Attal, suggesting that someone had secretly been feeding him answers. NewsGuard compared the circulating clip with authentic LCI footage and found no earpiece in the original. The distinction is important. France is not facing a single Russian propaganda operation but several overlapping networks using similar techniques and narratives. Treating every manipulation as Storm-1516 would obscure how this ecosystem actually functions. The real weapon is media impersonation The most interesting feature of Storm-1516 is not artificial intelligence itself. It is the systematic appropriation of the credibility of established journalism. Instead of relying only on anonymous Telegram channels or social-media profiles, operators create material that looks as though it originated from organisations audiences already recognise. A fabricated investigation can resemble Blast, a manipulated television report can borrow LCI's visual identity, while fake journalists and social-media accounts provide additional layers of apparent confirmation. VIGINUM has documented this architecture extensively. Its 2025 investigation analysed 77 Storm-1516 information operations and described a mature Russian system using fabricated media, websites and distribution networks to promote anti-Ukrainian and anti-Western narratives. The European External Action Service found that the infrastructure continued to expand. According to its 2026 FIMI Threat Report, Storm-1516 almost doubled its output during 2025. Five networks created that year to target French, German, American, Moldovan and international audiences comprised 453 websites, including fictional news organisations and sites impersonating genuine media or political platforms. A typical operation therefore follows a recognisable pattern: a fabricated allegation is supported by synthetic or manipulated evidence, published through an apparently legitimate source and then distributed by networks of accounts that create the appearance of wider discussion. AI makes this process faster and cheaper, but the fundamental objective remains the same – to manufacture credibility. Why begin nine months before an election? VIGINUM concluded that Storm-1516 is capable both of reacting rapidly to current events and of conducting longer campaigns aimed at discrediting Western institutions and public figures, particularly around elections and other major political events. This provides important context for France. Storm-1516 activity around the presidential race became visible in July 2026, approximately nine months before voting begins. There is no public evidence of a predetermined Russian “nine-month plan”, and the timing should not be presented as such. Early activity nevertheless provides operational advantages: narratives can be tested, websites and accounts established, audience reactions measured and the responses of journalists, authorities and fact-checkers observed. The first operations may therefore also provide information about which themes and techniques are most effective before the campaign enters its decisive months. This remains an analytical interpretation rather than a demonstrated statement of the operators' intentions. Russian operation, but what about the GRU? Attribution requires similar precision. VIGINUM explicitly describes Storm-1516 as a Russian information operation, and French authorities have attributed individual campaigns to it with high confidence. Connections with Russian military intelligence have also been reported. Glucksmann said the SGDSN informed him that the network targeting him was controlled by Russia's GRU, while French media have repeatedly described Storm-1516 as linked to Russian military intelligence. However, VIGINUM's publicly available technical documentation describes Storm-1516 primarily as a Russian information modus operandi, rather than identifying it as a formally established GRU unit. It is therefore well supported to describe Storm-1516 as a Russian influence operation with reported links to military intelligence. Saying simply that Storm-1516 is a GRU unit would go beyond what France's published technical evidence currently establishes. An early warning for the French election There is also no evidence that the operations have so far had a significant effect on French voters. Some of the fabricated material generated only limited engagement, and measuring the real impact of foreign information operations remains extremely difficult. Even a video attracting hundreds of thousands of views does not establish how many viewers believed it or whether it changed political attitudes. The significance of Storm-1516 lies instead in the infrastructure already being deployed. Months before the election, Russian influence networks have been able to test fake newsrooms, synthetic voices, manipulated television footage, candidate-specific narratives and systems for distributing them. The French case illustrates a broader evolution in election interference. The objective is no longer simply to place false claims on social media. Modern operations can manufacture an entire chain of apparent evidence in which a fake journalist cites a fake investigation, synthetic audio appears to confirm it and networks of accounts give the impression that an authentic controversy is unfolding. France still has months to go before its presidential election. The information environment surrounding it is already being contested. Sources: VIGINUM / SGDSN — Storm-1516 analysis https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/publications/analyse-du-mode-operatoire-informationnel-russe-storm-1516 VIGINUM / SGDSN — Full Storm-1516 technical report https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/20250507_TLP-CLEAR_NP_SGDSN_VIGINUM_Technical%20report_Storm-1516.pdf VIGINUM / SGDSN — Storm-1516 operation targeting Emmanuel Macron https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/publications/storm-1516-detection-dune-operation-dingerence-numerique-etrangere-ciblant-emmanuel EEAS — 4th Report on FIMI Threats https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2026/documents/EEAS%204th%20Threat%20Report_web.pdf Le Monde — Russian interference targeting Philippe, Glucksmann and Attal https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2026/08/07/presidentielle-2027-glucksmann-attal-philippe-les-ingerences-russes-s-invitent-dans-la-campagne_6740451_823448.html Le Monde — Storm-1516 and Matryoshka analysis https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2026/08/06/ingerences-russes-pourquoi-il-ne-faut-pas-nourrir-le-troll_6739956_4408996.html NewsGuard Risk Briefing — Russian activity targeting the French election https://newsguardriskbriefing.substack.com/p/russia-targets-french-elections-iran Euronews — Operation targeting Raphaël Glucksmann https://fr.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/08/04/presidentielle-de-2027-raphael-glucksmann-vise-par-une-operation-de-destabilisation-russe Télérama / AFP — Glucksmann deepfake investigation https://www.telerama.fr/debats-reportages/presidentielle-2027-raphael-glucksmann-vise-par-un-deepfake-d-origine-russe-7032318.php Le Parisien — Operation targeting Gabriel Attal https://www.leparisien.fr/elections/presidentielle/presidentielle-2027-gabriel-attal-a-son-tour-vise-par-une-ingerence-en-provenance-de-russie-05-08-2026-I3Z67Z7ZUBDUVBXUNDARI5KGPA.php Euronews — Paris prosecutor investigations into suspected Russian interference https://fr.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/08/18/soupcons-dingerence-russe-visant-attal-et-philippe-le-parquet-de-paris-ouvre-dune-enquete Keywords: #DISINFORMED #Episode6 #Storm1516 #France #FrenchElection2027 #Disinformation #InformationWarfare #InfluenceOperations #ForeignInterference #FIMI #RussianInfluence #RussianDisinformation #Propaganda #Deepfakes #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #SyntheticMedia #FakeNews #MediaImpersonation #FakeMedia #DigitalManipulation #ElectionInterference #PoliticalDisinformation #Matryoshka #VIGINUM #OSINT #CyberInfluence #DigitalInfluence #MediaManipulation #EuropeanSecurity #Democracy #WRLD

🚨 [À mes lecteurs] Bonjour à tous, Je reçois énormément de messages privés : je tiens à vous rassurer, je vais bien ! Simplement, j’ai décidé d’utiliser X avec parcimonie et à bon escient, comme on dit. Je constate l’effondrement (et même la déchéance) du débat public -« fasciste # antifasciste »- avec douze mots de vocabulaire, dont la moitié d’insultes et des militants qui s’écharpent pour leur champion respectif. Ça ne m’intéresse en rien, ni de près ni de loin, ça tourne en boucle et c’est stérile. Par conséquent, je réserve désormais l’usage de ce réseau à mes reportages sur le terrain, pour partager mes rencontres dans la vraie vie, publier des analyses politiques et géopolitiques et publier de temps à autre quelques portraits que j’espère bien sentis. Merci à tous pour votre confiance ! 🙏 #DébatPublic #AnalysePolitique #Journalisme

Max Westerman zit bij Renze en ik luister weer ademloos naar hem. Zijn reportages, van orkaan Katrina tot 9/11, maakten een blijvende indruk op me en zijn mede de reden dat ik journalistiek ging studeren. Vooral zijn werkwijze inspireerde: hij deed verslag en jij vormt je mening. #journalistiek #inspiratie #reportages

Over dit gigantische Spaanse protest tegen de migratieproblematiek in Ceuta vind je amper iets terug in onze klassieke media. Tegelijk krijgen reportages van linkse organisaties ter plaatse en verhalen waarbij kinderen worden ingezet als acteur uitgebreid aandacht. De Standaard schoot opnieuw de hoofdvogel af, door te schrijven dat "de crisis in Ceuta snel in de kiem werd gesmoord". Je vraagt je af waar het fake news zit, als je zoiets schrijft. Op een groeiend aantal thema’s is er een steeds grotere kloof tussen wat een aanzienlijk deel van de bevolking denkt en voelt, en welke standpunten en gebeurtenissen in klassieke media worden gebracht. Die kloof is onhoudbaar. #Migratie #Ceuta #Mediawijsheid

Ik blijf het zeggen: we zijn veel te naïef over klimaatgekken. In ons land krijgen organisaties met zo’n figuren tonnen subsidies en publi-reportages in de media. Op de openbare omroep zijn er journalisten met een stevige Code Rood-link. Klimaatactivisten word opgevoerd als helden en liefkozend omschreven als “burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid”. Het weekblad @Humo vond mij zelfs de gek toen ik dat enkele jaren geleden als eerste durfde benoemen. Hoelang kan deze waanzin nog blijven duren voordat er slachtoffers vallen? #klimaat #milieu #subsidies

🇫🇷 FLASH | Léa Salamé confirme qu’elle se met en RETRAIT du JT de France 2 après la candidature de Raphaël Glucksmann : "J'en avais pris l'engagement dès le premier jour et je m'y tiens. Je me mets en retrait de la présentation du journal de 20h, le temps de la candidature de mon compagnon, comme je l'avais fait lors des deux dernières élections européennes. Le 20h est un carrefour stratégique où les interviews des candidats et les reportages sur la campagne seront autant de temps forts de l'année à venir. Partout où se tiendra la campagne, je m'efface. Partout ailleurs, je suis, reste et resterai toujours journaliste. Une journaliste qui, avant d'être la compagne de quiconque, est une femme libre et intègre. Cette décision, prise en accord avec ma direction, est évidente et difficile. Évidente, car elle découle de la déontologie stricte que je me suis toujours imposée. Elle protège d'abord la rédaction de France Télévisions, ce qui compte plus que tout à mes yeux. Difficile, car j'aime le journal que nous avons construit collectivement, soir après soir, depuis un an. Notre seule boussole : les faits, l'indépendance et le pluralisme. De tout cela, je suis fière. Immensément fière. Ces valeurs continueront à animer le travail des 400 journalistes et de Jean-Baptiste Marteau qui fabriqueront tous les soirs le 20h. Merci infiniment, chers téléspectateurs, pour votre fidélité et votre soutien. On se retrouve très bientôt sur les antennes de France Télévisions". #LéaSalamé #Journalisme #France2

Gabriel Attal, candidat à la présidence française, est de nouveau la cible d'opérations de désinformation attribuées à des acteurs prorusses, avec des vidéos et des faux reportages diffusés sur des plateformes numériques, selon le service Viginum, qui lutte contre les ingérences étrangères. #Désinformation #GabrielAttal #IngérenceRusse

Steeds meer journalisten die de laatste jaren in het Brusselse zijn gaan wonen, voeren op hun sociale media een strijd tegen de luchthaven van Zaventem. Ze noemen het op hun sociale media onomwonden “geluidsterreur”, zoals @timverheyden (de man die eveneens ten strijd trekt “tegen polarisatie”, “fakenews” en “de gevaren van sociale media”). Dat past in het rijtje van dramatische termen die journalisten graag opwerpen, om zo uiteindelijk te doen alsof er een grote maatschappelijke consensus rond bestaat. Want je moet toch wel iets doen tegen terreur zeker? Weinig verrassend waren er het laatste jaar dan ook veel reportages, waarin de boodschap van actiegroepen tégen de luchthaven luid klonk. Wat verwacht je als journalisten er zelf deel van uitmaken of een grote persoonlijke sympathie voor koesteren? Net zoals de quasi publi-reportages voor extinction rebellion en co. De luchthaven is van economisch levensbelang. Het is ontzettend dwaas dat de Vlaamse overheid er 2 miljard euro aan heeft verbrast. Het is nog dwazer hoe een kleine maar vocaal sterke groep met actieve steun van een deel van de media ze weg wil. #Zaventem #Geluidsoverlast #Mediawijsheid

🚨🚨 La FIFA a publié un communiqué affirmant qu'il existe un "UN EFFORT CONCERTÉ ET CONTINU POUR NUIRE LA FIFA ET SON PRÉSIDENT. 😤 𝗟𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗤𝗨𝗘́ 👇 « Dans l'esprit des récentes déclarations de la CONMEBOL et de la CAF, ainsi que des discussions avec les associations membres et confédérations de la FIFA du monde entier, la FIFA ne soutiendra, ne facilitera ni ne tolérera aucun processus concernant l'élection du président de la FIFA qui serait incompatible avec les statuts de la FIFA, les procédures démocratiques et le cadre de gouvernance établi. Le président de la FIFA a été élu démocratiquement par les associations membres de la FIFA. Il est de plus en plus évident qu'il existe un effort concerté et continu de certains pour saper la FIFA et son président. Ceux qui ne bénéficient pas du soutien des associations membres de la FIFA ne devraient pas chercher à obtenir par des allégations, des insinuations ou de la désinformation ce qu'ils ne peuvent obtenir par les processus démocratiques établis de la FIFA. Les récents reportages ont inclus des affirmations non étayées et des allégations manifestement fausses concernant la FIFA et son président. Les spéculations et insinuations ne devraient pas être présentées comme des faits, et la répétition ne rend pas une allégation vraie. Le président de la FIFA a consacré plus de 30 ans de sa vie professionnelle au football européen et mondial, contribuant à des changements significatifs dans le jeu et, en particulier, à l'élargissement de l'accès, des ressources et des opportunités dans le football mondial. Le changement défie inévitablement les intérêts établis, mais le désaccord avec ce changement ne peut justifier les efforts pour saper le mandat démocratique du président de la FIFA ou l'institution qu'il a été élu pour diriger. La FIFA accueille favorablement un examen légitime. Mais l'examen n'est pas une licence pour déformer les faits, amplifier des allégations non étayées ou fabriquer des distractions destinées à saper les progrès. Lorsque les reportages sont inexacts ou trompeurs, la FIFA les contestera directement et vigoureusement. La responsabilité de la FIFA est envers ses 211 associations membres et envers le football dans le monde entier. Nous ne nous laisserons pas distraire ou détourner de notre objectif de renforcer l'organisation, de servir nos associations membres et de poursuivre le travail visant à rendre le football véritablement mondial. À travers le président de la FIFA et l'administration de la FIFA, notre attention reste fermement concentrée sur cette mission, et nous sommes plus déterminés que jamais à la réaliser. » via @JacobsBen #FIFA #Football #Gouvernance