Search

L’Atleti essaye de pousser la narrative selon laquelle Julian est un pauvre petit bébé qui se fait manipuler par son agent et le Barça mais qu’ils réussiront à le ramener sur le droit chemin…mdr le manque de respect de fou…ils vont jusqu’à l’infantiliser Si je suis Julian, c’est le bon moment de faire une Isak. De poster un communiqué ou même de sortir parler publiquement et dénoncer ce malade mental de Gil Marin #Football #Julian #Respect

Ich bin weder links noch rechts. Ich bin nicht Mitglied in einer politischen Partei. Ich beobachte, lese, denke nach, und bilde mir dann mein Urteil. Ich orientiere mich am UNO-Gewaltverbot, das besagt, dass es für alle 193 Staaten der Welt verboten ist, in ihren internationalen Beziehungen Gewalt oder Drohungen einzusetzen. Dieses Gewaltverbot gilt für alle Parteien, links, Mitte und rechts. Es gilt seit 1945 und steht in der UNO-Charta. Mir ist schon klar, es wurde immer wieder gebrochen. Es ist mir trotzdem wichtig. Ich mag Menschen, die selbst denken. Die Fragen stellen. Die nicht alles glauben, nur weil es oft wiederholt wurde. Ich mag Menschen, die bereit sind, ihre Sichtweise zu ändern, wenn sie neue Informationen bekommen. Gerade bei grossen Narrativen wie 9/11, Corona und Ukraine wird man sofort diffamiert, wenn man vom betreuten Denken abweicht. Davon sollte man sich nie einschüchtern lassen. Ich mag Menschen, die den Mut haben, auch in der Öffentlichkeit friedlich und sachlich ihre eigene Meinung zu vertreten – und gleichzeitig abweichende Meinungen von anderen akzeptieren. Ich glaube wir gehören alle zur Menschheitsfamilie. #Frieden #Selbstdenken #Menschenrechte

mags et greta subisse de la mysoginoire y’a pas mieux à dire. ça fait des semaines qu’on le dit mais ce sont les méchantes quoi qu’il arrive dans la narrative et vous allez faire gagner soit une raciste soit une gaslighteuse / menteuse #secretstory https://t.co/5E8nRQUzc0 #mythes #racisme #manipulation

Dare per fatto un giocatore e costruirci sopra una narrazione per mettere in cattiva luce una proprietà che non è pratica nel suddividere le risorse non significa raccontare il mercato. Significa informare male, molto male. Il mercato va raccontato sui fatti, non sulle narrative. #Mercato #Calcio #Informazione

🚨 NEW PAPER RELEASED Can Blockchain Really Solve Voting? First question: What kind of voting are you talking about? DAO votes ≠ Shareholder elections ≠ HOA elections ≠ binding Government elections Full paper 👉 https://t.co/U0gBxPITKS From crypto narrative to election https://t.co/9SnkIMod1B #Blockchain #Voting #DAOs #Nospecificcountrycodesarementionedinthetweet.

Rabaa: The Hour the World’s Conscience Stood Still On the anniversary of one of the largest single-day killings of protesters in modern history, one question remains unanswered: who will be held accountable? By Adham Hasanin Egyptian journalist and political writer, based in the Netherlands On 14 August, the anniversary returns of a day unlike any other in modern Egyptian history. Not simply because it was the bloodiest Egypt has known wars and massacres before and since ,but because it was the day a state chose to open fire on its own people in broad daylight, in front of the world’s cameras, and then let thirteen years pass without a single officer ever being held accountable. This article will not be a cold recitation of statistics, though the statistics exist, are documented, and are horrifying. It is an attempt to understand something deeper: how a square in the heart of Cairo, filled with tents, children, and worshippers, became the site of the largest mass killing the Arab world has witnessed in the past decade and why the echo of that day still reverberates in every Egyptian prison cell today. I. A Morning That Began Like Any Other For readers unfamiliar with the background: in July 2013, the Egyptian military, led by then-General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, removed Mohamed Morsy Egypt’s first freely elected civilian president, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood who had taken office in 2012 following the 2011 uprising against Hosni Mubarak. In response, tens of thousands of Morsy’s supporters staged an open-ended sit-in demanding his reinstatement. By 14 August 2013, more than twenty thousand people had spent weeks camped out at two Cairo squares, Rab’a al-Adawiya and al-Nahda, in a peaceful sit-in. They were not an army, nor a uniform bloc; they were entire families men, women, and children, some affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, many simply ordinary citizens who saw the restoration of elected legitimacy as a cause worth the risk. There were tents for sleeping, communal kitchens feeding the demonstrators, speaking platforms, and a small field clinic that no one imagined would, within hours, become one of the most terrifying places in modern Egyptian history. In the early hours of that morning, Central Security Forces and army units, under the command of then-General Sisi, began what was officially described as a "dispersal" operation targeting both sit-ins simultaneously. It was not a dispersal in any ordinary sense of the word. According to a year-long investigation by Human Rights Watch, it was a pre-planned operation that anticipated, from the outset, thousands of deaths. II. The Numbers the Regime Refuses to Speak The Egyptian government, to this day, cites a death toll of "over 600" for that single day a figure that, even at its official lowest, is horrifying enough to warrant an independent international investigation. But the field investigation conducted by Human Rights Watch, drawing on field hospital records, survivor testimony, and analysis of video footage from dozens of angles, arrived at a far more disturbing figure: at least 817 people killed at Rab’a Square alone, with the true toll likely exceeding 1,000, plus another 87 killed at the nearby al-Nahda Square. When the deaths from the weeks surrounding 14 August are added from the dispersal of the Republican Guard sit-in on 8 July, through the Mansoura Street killings, to the dispersal of an October 6 march the combined total reaches at least 1,150 deaths in just six weeks, according to Human Rights Watch’s meticulous documentation. This figure led the organisation to use a term not deployed lightly in international law: crimes against humanity. Human Rights Watch described the Rab’a killings as "one of the world’s largest killings of demonstrators in a single day in recent history." Not in Egyptian history alone in modern history as a whole. What happened at Rab’a is cited in international reporting alongside China’s 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. This is the true scale of what the Egyptian state has spent thirteen years trying to minimise, justify, and reduce to a mere "security incident" in a news bulletin. III. "All According to Plan" When Mass Killing Becomes Administration, Not Chaos The title Human Rights Watch chose for its detailed report on the massacre deserves lingering on: "All According to Plan." This is not an emotive headline; it is a precise legal conclusion built on field evidence. According to the investigation, what happened at Rab’a was not a dispersal operation that spiralled out of control amid chaos or panic, as the regime later tried to portray it. It was a carefully planned operation that assumed, in advance, massive casualties. Then-Interior Minister Mohamed Ibrahim admitted, in a televised interview broadcast on 31 August 2013 just weeks after the massacre that his ministry had anticipated losses of "10 percent of the people" present at the sit-in, acknowledging that the number of demonstrators exceeded twenty thousand. By simple arithmetic, this is an official admission that the state anticipated, in advance, the deaths of roughly two thousand people and proceeded with the operation regardless. This is the true horror at the heart of the Rab’a story: it was not a security operation that spun out of control, but a conscious administrative decision, made in an air-conditioned room, with advance calculations, by men who knew precisely how many human beings would die under their fire and who proceeded anyway, or perhaps because of it. According to Human Rights Watch’s analysis, the objective was to send an unambiguous message: whoever challenges the new state will pay an irreversible price. IV. Snipers, Women, and Children The Faces the Reports Do Not Tell Behind every number in the Human Rights Watch reports lies a full human story, deliberately omitted from the state’s official narrative. The investigation documented how security forces opened fire from multiple angles, and how snipers positioned themselves atop buildings surrounding the square, targeting according to survivor testimony and analysed video footage any movement in the square, regardless of whether it was an armed combatant or a nurse trying to reach a wounded person. According to documented testimony, entire families had their tents burn over their heads as fire swept through the sit-in. Doctors and paramedics were killed while trying to pull the wounded from the line of fire. Most damningly of all, the documentation shows deliberate targeting of ambulances and field medical points meaning that wounded people who survived the first bullet then faced death by bleeding out, because anyone attempting to save them was themselves a target. This detail the targeting of medics is what elevates the event from "excessive violent repression" to what human rights organisations have described as a systematic crime. When security forces target those trying to save the wounded, they are not merely dispersing a sit-in; they are preventing witnesses from surviving to tell what happened. V. Thirteen Years of Total Impunity The most painful part of the Rab’a story is not only what happened that day, but what has not happened in the years since. From 14 August 2013 to today, not a single officer, of any rank, has been held accountable for the deaths of hundreds, or thousands, of Egyptians. Quite the opposite: the state has moved to entrench impunity through the force of law itself. Egypt issued legislation granting senior military officers immunity from questioning over any violations that may have occurred following Morsy’s removal a law specifically designed to close the door on any future judicial accountability, regardless of how political circumstances might change. Even the fact-finding committee established by then-interim President Adly Mansour to investigate the June and July events concluded, in its report issued more than a year after the events, that the sit-in’s leaders bore responsibility for the deaths, on the grounds that they had allowed weapons into the square even as the same report admitted, in a glaring contradiction, that security forces had failed to target only armed individuals, meaning they had fired indiscriminately on everyone: armed and unarmed, man and woman, adult and child. This is the pattern that has repeated for over a decade: as each anniversary approaches, official statements re-narrate the events and shift blame onto the victims, while the actual perpetrators — those who planned the operation, gave the orders, and pulled the trigger — remain free. Some now occupy the highest offices of the state. VI. Why This Anniversary, Why Now? A reader might ask: why revisit this story after all these years? Has the world not moved on to newer crises? The answer lies in the very nature of impunity. When a state is never held accountable for the largest massacre of protesters in its modern history, it does not simply "forget" the crime it sets a precedent, telling every future ruler and every future security apparatus: mass killing is possible, politically profitable, and free of cost. This poisonous lesson does not remain confined within Egyptian borders; its echo reaches every Arab capital contemplating how to handle its own opposition. More dangerously, this system of impunity did not stop at Rab’a’s edges; it is the foundation on which Egypt’s entire subsequent decade of repression was built: thousands of political prisoners, grossly unfair mass trials that produced death sentences for dozens of defendants in cases linked directly to the Rab’a events themselves, laws criminalising peaceful protest, a muzzled press, and a civil society hollowed of substance. All of it traces back to the morning of 14 August 2013, when the state learned that overwhelming force succeeds, and that the world will condemn for a few days, then move on. VII. Delayed Justice Is Not Forgotten Justice Despite more than a decade of official silence and impunity, the Rab’a case remains alive in international legal memory. Human rights organisations, from Human Rights Watch to Amnesty International, continue to renew their annual calls for an independent international investigation, grounded in the legal principle that crimes against humanity are not subject to statutes of limitation: delayed justice is not forgotten justice. The victims who fell in that square were not numbers in a statistical report. They were fathers who left behind children too young, that day, to understand why their father would never return. They were mothers who, thirteen years later, are still searching for a clearly marked grave to which they can carry flowers, and young people who had decades of life ahead of them that they never got to live. Their memory does not fade with time; it grows with their children, who carry with them the same question their parents asked before they were killed: when will justice come? Conclusion: What Does This Anniversary Demand of Us? Every year, as the anniversary of 14 August returns, the same question resurfaces one the Egyptian state refuses to answer: who gave the order? Who planned the operation? Who decided that twenty thousand human beings deserved to be shot with live ammunition because they staged a peaceful sit-in? This anniversary is not a call for vengeance, nor an invocation of the past for its own sake. It is a reminder that justice, however delayed, remains a debt still owed. And that every instance of international silence over a massacre of this scale opens the door to the next one, elsewhere, under a different pretext, carrying the same lethal conviction: that the world will condemn for a week, then forget. We will not forget. And we will not stop asking the question that unsettles everyone who took part in that crime, regardless of the office they hold today: where is the accountability? Rab’a is no longer merely the name of a square in Cairo. In the conscience of everyone who believes in justice, it has become a test of the world’s conscience itself a test the world has not yet passed.

So far there is consensus: The ARD fact check on vaccinating pregnant women is wrong. But it's not an "error," rather a deception in the interest of the government. Background: Public service broadcasting and politics have a deal: Public service broadcasting spreads narratives like bus drivers who take down explosive drones with a kick. (translated)

"Das Gehaltsbudget reicht nicht für mehr Qualität im Kader." Veerman - 3 bis 4 Mio. Karetsas - 3,5 Mio. Konstantelias - 3 bis 4 Mio. Drei Top-Spieler, deren Gehälter insgesamt niedriger als das von Süle sind. Immer mehr Narrative rund um den BVB werden widerlegt. #BVB #Fußball #Transfermarkt #Bundesliga

Wahlkampftaktisch wäre es ein Nobrainer für Schulze gewesen, mit Siegmund bei Ben zu reden. Viel schlimmer kann es sowieso nicht werden. Eine Wildcard wie so eine zeitlich unbegrenzte Livedebatte abseits des Mainstreams ist für den, der haushoch führt, das größere Risiko. Es muss nur ein wirklich ungünstiger Clip bei rumkommen. Und Schulze hätte buchstäblich Stunden gehabt, den rauszukitzeln. Die Angst bestand glaube ich eher davor, A: Bens unkontrollierbarem Format noch größere Aufmerksamkeit & Legitimität zu geben und B: tragende Narrative, die über den Wahlkampf hinausgehen, vor Millionen Leuten zerpflückt zu bekommen. Mit letzterem gewinnt oder verliert man übrigens keine Wahlen. Dabei geht es um längerfristigen gedanklichen Wandel. Andersherum ist es ja so, dass man einen AfD-Spitzenpolitiker vor einer wichtigen Wahl sogar besonders gut dabei torpedieren kann, indem man faktisch richtige Standpunkte in Richtungen rückt, die Wähler abschrecken. Und trotzdem machen sie es nicht: Mit dem Rücken zur Wand, im Wahlkampf nichts mehr zu verlieren und einem Gegenüber, das gerade sogar besonders unfrei in dem ist, was es sagen kann. #Wahlkampf #Politik #Debatte

7 Jahre. Das was jetzt kommt ist brutal, aber es wird euch einen Mehrwert liefern. 7 Jahre lang habe ich alles verfolgt was man in diesem Space verfolgen kann. Onchain Aktivitäten, Wallets von Walen, jede Bewegung von Saylor, jedes ETF Flow Update, jedes Modell das irgendwo aufpoppte. Glassnode, Cryptoquant.. und und und…. Tage damit verbracht Fluss Charts zu analysieren und Muster zu suchen wo vielleicht gar keine waren. Und wisst ihr zu welchem Schluss ich nach 7 Jahren gekommen bin? Das war zu 90 Prozent verschwendete Zeit. #Bitcoin geht laut Zeit und Daten seinen Weg. Punkt. Alles was ich an Modellen und Metriken gebraucht habe, konnte am Ende nichts von dem erklären was dieser Vier Jahres Zyklus sowieso schon von selbst geliefert hat. Die Narrative drum herum sind Beiwerk. Steigt Bitcoin, waren es die ETF Zuflüsse. Fällt er, war es die Fed. Passiert nichts, konsolidiert er halt. Immer gibt es eine Story die man perfekt drüberlegen kann. Aber die Story erklärt nichts. Sie beschreibt nur. ALLES ist im Nachhinein zu erklären. Und an dieser Stelle muss ich ehrlich sein. Ich habe im letzten Zyklus einen Fehler gemacht. Ich habe zu sehr auf die Euphorie gehofft und darauf spekuliert dass die Altcoin Season wie in den Zyklen davor kommt. Das war nicht gut. Und ich sage das ganz bewusst so klar. Weil jeder Investor auf dieser Welt sich nur mit diesen zwei Sätzen wirklich verbessern kann. Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht. Oder das war nicht gut. Wer das nicht über die Lippen bringt, wird in diesem Markt niemals wachsen. Und trotzdem bin ich heute überzeugter denn je dass Altcoins ihre Chance bekommen können. Ich glaube sogar dass eine echte Altseason im nächsten Zyklus möglich ist. Unter den richtigen Bedingungen. Ich glaube dass #Solana 500 Dollar sehen kann und #BNB neue Hochs erreichen wird. Aber alles davon hängt an Bitcoin. Wenn Bitcoin nicht in Euphorie toppt, bleibt auch die Altseason wieder aus. Genau wie im letzten Zyklus. Und ob Bitcoin in die Euphorie läuft entscheidet am Ende vor allem eine Sache. Die Fed. Ihre Zinspolitik und die Liquidität. Sinken die Zinsen bis 2027 und 2028 spürbar, ist alles möglich. Wenn nicht, bleibt es wie zuletzt. Und jetzt kommt der Teil den viele nicht hören wollen. Ich bin fest davon überzeugt dass die meisten Altcoins in erster Linie deswegen existieren um vom Bitcoin Vier Jahres Zyklus zu profitieren und damit Kohle zu machen. Keine echte Anwendung, kein wirklicher Nutzen, kein Produkt das ohne Spekulation existieren könnte. Vehikel um in einem Bullrun Vielfache zu machen. NICHTS anderes. Ausnahmen gibt es. #Solana bei den Memecoins hat eine ehrliche Nutzung. #BNB hat mit Binance einen realen Backbone und kassiert echte Gebühren. #Hyperliquid liefert ein Produkt das funktioniert. Ethereum hat sich als Infrastruktur etabliert, auch wenn die Bewertungsfrage bleibt. Aber der Rest? Bitte macht euch nichts vor. Nehmt #XRP. Wie hoch ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit dass eine Bank tatsächlich #XRP in relevanter Größenordnung einsetzt? Sehr gering. Die Blockchain interessiert keine Sau in der realen Finanzwelt. Heißt das dass XRP nie wieder steigt? Nein. Mit ETF, Hype und Marketing Macht sind neue Höchststände möglich. Aber das ist Spekulation die den Bitcoin Zyklus als Motor nutzt.. Und genau das ist der Mehrwert den ich euch mit diesem Post liefern will. Ich bin selbst durch 7 Jahre voller Illusionen gegangen. Am Ende hat mich immer der schlichte Vier Jahres Zyklus mehr Geld gekostet oder mehr Geld eingebracht als jede noch so komplexe Onchain Analyse. Weniger ist mehr. Bitcoin verstehen. Zyklus verstehen. Fed im Auge behalten. Ein paar wenige Altcoins mit echtem Kern verstehen. Der Rest ist einfach Quatsch. Wolf #Bitcoin #Altcoins #Kryptowährungen

Claiming that Ukraine needs a “denazification”... by Nazi-inspired Wagner criminals and war criminals has got to be one of the most absurd Kremlin narratives, right up there with “cookies coup” and “NATO expansion”. https://t.co/CMmBiIJpXA #Ukraine #WagnerGroup #KremlinNarratives #UA #RU

Sådan ser statsfinansieret klimaaktivisme ud👇 Regeringen giver DR over 3,5 mia. kr. om året – og 2 mio. kr. til klimapolitiske NGO’er som Plastic Change, der køber fuldt ind på “klima-krise”-narrativet. DR laver derefter en dækning, der følger regeringens linje, fx artiklen: "Ny emballagelov er trådt i kraft, men danske virksomheder er ikke klar: Bureaukratisk sprint med bind for øjnene" NGO’en bruges i inddrages i dækningen som kilde til at fortælle, at der ikke gøres nok for at redde klimaet. Resultat: En regering der råber op om klima-krise, finansierer mediet der dækker den – og betaler NGO’erne der optræder som eksperter. Alt sammen for dine og mine skattekroner. #Klima #Aktivisme #Politik

Je suis encore choqué que la prod n’ait pas mis le début de l’embrouille entre Océane et Malo, où elle lui parle mal, et qu’ils aient juste mis le long confessionnal d’Océane qui raconte l’histoire de son point de vue. Et après, ils mettent le passage où tout le monde lui demande des explications pour renforcer la narrative que tout le monde s’acharne sur elle. #SecretStory #SecretStory #TVReality #Drama

The Mainstream Media "has continued to play its part by calling this a 'Ceasefire' while largely repeating the Israeli narrative of these massacres". Israeli Terrorism will continue as long as countries continue to do Business with them, continue to play football with them... #IsraeliTerrorism #Ceasefire #MediaBias #IL

Auffällig ist vor allem, wer offenbar nicht ins Visier gerät: die AfD. Russische Fake-Kampagnen erfinden Morde, beschädigen Politiker und säen Misstrauen vor den Landtagswahlen – aber ausgerechnet jene Partei, die ständig russische Narrative verbreitet und Sanktionen gegen Moskau bekämpft, bleibt verschont. Manchmal verrät die Auswahl der Ziele mehr als die Propaganda selbst https://t.co/97xxzzmbfw #Politik #Faktencheck #Desinformation

Vi er nu nået dertil hvor Søren Vatpind kommer med injuriende anklager om at Baronen "vil klynge folk op i lygtepælene". Tabere som ham har jo fuldstændig mistet fatningen. De har tabt kontrollen med narrativet, og det skræmmer og ryster dem i deres grundvold. Så alt de små mennesker har tilbage er at råbe hysterisk op med løgne og usandheder. Imens sidder Baronen i sin borgerjournalistiske højborg og sipper deres saltede tårer dagen lang😂🧂 #Danmark #Politik #Borgerjournalistik